Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter?
Krupka and Weber (2013) introduce an incentive-compatible coordination game as an alternative method for elicitation of normative judgments. I show, however, that people provide virtually the same responses in incentivized and non-incentivized versions of the Krupka-Weber game. Besides ratings of s...
Main Author: | Štěpán Veselý |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/14/14925b/jdm14925b.pdf |
Similar Items
-
The value of a smile: Facial expression affects ultimatum-game responses
by: Patrick Mussel, et al.
Published: (2013-05-01) -
Reconciling pro-social vs. selfish behavior: On the role of self-control
by: Kristian Ove R. Myrseth, et al.
Published: (2012-05-01) -
Money talks: Neural substrate of modulation of fairness by monetary incentives
by: Yuan eZhou, et al.
Published: (2014-05-01) -
Fairness norm through social networks: a simulation approach
by: Omar Rifki, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
Fairness and Smiling Mediate the Effects of Openness on Perceived Fairness: Beside Perceived Intention
by: Zhifang He, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01)