Closing the loop on test results to reduce communication failures: a rapid review of evidence, practice and patient perspectives

Abstract Background Communication failures involving test results contribute to issues of patient harm and sentinel events. This article aims to synthesise review evidence, practice insights and patient perspectives addressing problems encountered in the communication of diagnostic test results. Met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Breanna Wright, Alyse Lennox, Mark L. Graber, Peter Bragge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-09-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05737-x
id doaj-077c58524f9847fd969dc6796847ab0b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-077c58524f9847fd969dc6796847ab0b2020-11-25T02:32:27ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632020-09-0120111110.1186/s12913-020-05737-xClosing the loop on test results to reduce communication failures: a rapid review of evidence, practice and patient perspectivesBreanna Wright0Alyse Lennox1Mark L. Graber2Peter Bragge3BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Clayton CampusBehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Clayton CampusSociety to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine (SIDM)BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Clayton CampusAbstract Background Communication failures involving test results contribute to issues of patient harm and sentinel events. This article aims to synthesise review evidence, practice insights and patient perspectives addressing problems encountered in the communication of diagnostic test results. Methods The rapid review identified ten systematic reviews and four narrative reviews. Five practitioner interviews identified insights into interventions and implementation, and a citizen panel with 15 participants explored the patient viewpoint. Results The rapid review provided support for the role of technology to ensure effective communication; behavioural interventions such as audit and feedback could be effective in changing clinician behaviour; and point-of-care tests (bedside testing) eliminate the communication breakdown problem altogether. The practice interviews highlighted transparency, and clarifying the lines of responsibility as central to improving test result communication. Enabling better information sharing, implementing adequate planning and utilising technology were also identified in the practice interviews as viable strategies to improve test result communication. The citizen panel highlighted technology as critical to improving communication of test results to both health professionals and patients. Patients also highlighted the importance of having different ways of accessing test results, which is particularly pertinent when ensuring suitability for vulnerable populations. Conclusions This paper draws together multiple perspectives on the problem of failures in diagnostic test results communication to inform appropriate interventions. Across the three studies, technology was identified as the most feasible option for closing the loop on test result communication. However, the importance of clear, consistent communication and more streamlined processes were also key elements that emerged. Review registration The protocol for the rapid review was registered with PROSPERO CRD42018093316 .http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05737-xPatient safetyTest resultsCommunicationPatient safetyDiagnostic errorRadiology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Breanna Wright
Alyse Lennox
Mark L. Graber
Peter Bragge
spellingShingle Breanna Wright
Alyse Lennox
Mark L. Graber
Peter Bragge
Closing the loop on test results to reduce communication failures: a rapid review of evidence, practice and patient perspectives
BMC Health Services Research
Patient safety
Test results
Communication
Patient safety
Diagnostic error
Radiology
author_facet Breanna Wright
Alyse Lennox
Mark L. Graber
Peter Bragge
author_sort Breanna Wright
title Closing the loop on test results to reduce communication failures: a rapid review of evidence, practice and patient perspectives
title_short Closing the loop on test results to reduce communication failures: a rapid review of evidence, practice and patient perspectives
title_full Closing the loop on test results to reduce communication failures: a rapid review of evidence, practice and patient perspectives
title_fullStr Closing the loop on test results to reduce communication failures: a rapid review of evidence, practice and patient perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Closing the loop on test results to reduce communication failures: a rapid review of evidence, practice and patient perspectives
title_sort closing the loop on test results to reduce communication failures: a rapid review of evidence, practice and patient perspectives
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Abstract Background Communication failures involving test results contribute to issues of patient harm and sentinel events. This article aims to synthesise review evidence, practice insights and patient perspectives addressing problems encountered in the communication of diagnostic test results. Methods The rapid review identified ten systematic reviews and four narrative reviews. Five practitioner interviews identified insights into interventions and implementation, and a citizen panel with 15 participants explored the patient viewpoint. Results The rapid review provided support for the role of technology to ensure effective communication; behavioural interventions such as audit and feedback could be effective in changing clinician behaviour; and point-of-care tests (bedside testing) eliminate the communication breakdown problem altogether. The practice interviews highlighted transparency, and clarifying the lines of responsibility as central to improving test result communication. Enabling better information sharing, implementing adequate planning and utilising technology were also identified in the practice interviews as viable strategies to improve test result communication. The citizen panel highlighted technology as critical to improving communication of test results to both health professionals and patients. Patients also highlighted the importance of having different ways of accessing test results, which is particularly pertinent when ensuring suitability for vulnerable populations. Conclusions This paper draws together multiple perspectives on the problem of failures in diagnostic test results communication to inform appropriate interventions. Across the three studies, technology was identified as the most feasible option for closing the loop on test result communication. However, the importance of clear, consistent communication and more streamlined processes were also key elements that emerged. Review registration The protocol for the rapid review was registered with PROSPERO CRD42018093316 .
topic Patient safety
Test results
Communication
Patient safety
Diagnostic error
Radiology
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05737-x
work_keys_str_mv AT breannawright closingtheloopontestresultstoreducecommunicationfailuresarapidreviewofevidencepracticeandpatientperspectives
AT alyselennox closingtheloopontestresultstoreducecommunicationfailuresarapidreviewofevidencepracticeandpatientperspectives
AT marklgraber closingtheloopontestresultstoreducecommunicationfailuresarapidreviewofevidencepracticeandpatientperspectives
AT peterbragge closingtheloopontestresultstoreducecommunicationfailuresarapidreviewofevidencepracticeandpatientperspectives
_version_ 1724819121133060096