Impact of Community Forestry Policy on Farmers in Rinjani Protected Forest Area

<em><span lang="IN">The aim of this </span><span>research i</span><span lang="IN">s to know</span><span>:</span><span lang="IN"> (1) </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">eco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryke Nandini, Ambar Kusumandari, Totok Gunawan, Ronggo Sadono
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Negeri Semarang 2016-06-01
Series:JEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jejak/article/view/7185
id doaj-078e2f146a09444f986f359ab393f526
record_format Article
spelling doaj-078e2f146a09444f986f359ab393f5262020-11-25T01:44:06ZengUniversitas Negeri SemarangJEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan2460-51232016-06-0191344910.15294/jejak.v9i1.71854865Impact of Community Forestry Policy on Farmers in Rinjani Protected Forest AreaRyke Nandini0Ambar Kusumandari1Totok Gunawan2Ronggo Sadono3Student of Doctoral Program (S3), Study of Forestry Science, Gadjah Mada UniversityStudy of Forestry Science, Gadjah Mada University,Faculty of Geography, Gadjah Mada University,Faculty of Forestry, Gadjah Mada University,<em><span lang="IN">The aim of this </span><span>research i</span><span lang="IN">s to know</span><span>:</span><span lang="IN"> (1) </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">economic condition</span><span>s</span><span lang="IN"> of </span><span>the community forestry (HKm) </span><span lang="IN">farmer</span><span>s</span><span>seen </span><span lang="IN">from </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">income and </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">poverty</span><span> level</span><span lang="IN">; (2) </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">social condition</span><span>s</span><span lang="IN"> of </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">HKm farmer</span><span>s</span><span>seen </span><span lang="IN">from </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">education</span><span> level</span><span lang="IN"> and </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">behavior changes; and (3)</span><span> the </span><span lang="IN">change of social economic</span><span> conditions</span><span lang="IN"> of </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">HKm farmer</span><span>s</span><span lang="IN"> in 2008-2015. This </span><span>research</span><span>is</span><span lang="IN"> conducted from April to July in 2015 and located in four HKm groups of Rinjani pr</span><span>otect</span><span lang="IN">ed </span><span>forest </span><span lang="IN">area (RTK I). </span><span>The d</span><span lang="IN">ata collection </span><span>is conducted</span><span lang="IN"> by </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">interview</span><span>s with questionnaire</span><span>to </span><span lang="IN">102 HKm farmers </span><span>using the</span><span lang="IN"> Slovin’s formula with 10% of significant degree</span><span>.</span><span>This is</span><span lang="IN"> implemented </span><span>in descriptive analysis.</span><span lang="IN"> The </span><span>research </span><span lang="IN">result show</span><span>s</span><span lang="IN"> that</span><span>:</span><span lang="IN"> (1) </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">average income of the HKm farmer</span><span>s</span><span lang="IN"> is Rp</span><span lang="IN">1</span><span>,</span><span lang="IN">739</span><span>,</span><span lang="IN">677 per month/ha and 59</span><span>.</span><span lang="IN">8% of farmers are </span><span>above</span><span lang="IN"> the poverty line; (2) the farmers are increasingly aware of education (there are only 5</span><span>.</span><span lang="IN">9% </span><span>members of </span><span lang="IN">farmer’s family who are uneducated) and the</span><span> lack of</span><span>firewood utilization</span><span lang="IN"> (there are only 23</span><span>.</span><span lang="IN">5% farmers who are still using </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">firewood); and (3) </span><span>in the period of</span><span lang="IN"> 2008 to 2015 the </span><span>average </span><span lang="IN">income </span><span>of the farmers </span><span lang="IN">per month increases</span><span> at</span><span lang="IN"> 52,03%; </span><span>the poverty level decreases at </span><span lang="IN">46</span><span>.</span><span lang="IN">5%, and </span><span>there is a behavior change in which</span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">dependence on </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">forest resources </span><span>in the form of</span><span lang="IN"> firewood decreases</span></em>http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jejak/article/view/7185ommunity forestry, income, poverty, behavior change
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ryke Nandini
Ambar Kusumandari
Totok Gunawan
Ronggo Sadono
spellingShingle Ryke Nandini
Ambar Kusumandari
Totok Gunawan
Ronggo Sadono
Impact of Community Forestry Policy on Farmers in Rinjani Protected Forest Area
JEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan
ommunity forestry, income, poverty, behavior change
author_facet Ryke Nandini
Ambar Kusumandari
Totok Gunawan
Ronggo Sadono
author_sort Ryke Nandini
title Impact of Community Forestry Policy on Farmers in Rinjani Protected Forest Area
title_short Impact of Community Forestry Policy on Farmers in Rinjani Protected Forest Area
title_full Impact of Community Forestry Policy on Farmers in Rinjani Protected Forest Area
title_fullStr Impact of Community Forestry Policy on Farmers in Rinjani Protected Forest Area
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Community Forestry Policy on Farmers in Rinjani Protected Forest Area
title_sort impact of community forestry policy on farmers in rinjani protected forest area
publisher Universitas Negeri Semarang
series JEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan
issn 2460-5123
publishDate 2016-06-01
description <em><span lang="IN">The aim of this </span><span>research i</span><span lang="IN">s to know</span><span>:</span><span lang="IN"> (1) </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">economic condition</span><span>s</span><span lang="IN"> of </span><span>the community forestry (HKm) </span><span lang="IN">farmer</span><span>s</span><span>seen </span><span lang="IN">from </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">income and </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">poverty</span><span> level</span><span lang="IN">; (2) </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">social condition</span><span>s</span><span lang="IN"> of </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">HKm farmer</span><span>s</span><span>seen </span><span lang="IN">from </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">education</span><span> level</span><span lang="IN"> and </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">behavior changes; and (3)</span><span> the </span><span lang="IN">change of social economic</span><span> conditions</span><span lang="IN"> of </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">HKm farmer</span><span>s</span><span lang="IN"> in 2008-2015. This </span><span>research</span><span>is</span><span lang="IN"> conducted from April to July in 2015 and located in four HKm groups of Rinjani pr</span><span>otect</span><span lang="IN">ed </span><span>forest </span><span lang="IN">area (RTK I). </span><span>The d</span><span lang="IN">ata collection </span><span>is conducted</span><span lang="IN"> by </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">interview</span><span>s with questionnaire</span><span>to </span><span lang="IN">102 HKm farmers </span><span>using the</span><span lang="IN"> Slovin’s formula with 10% of significant degree</span><span>.</span><span>This is</span><span lang="IN"> implemented </span><span>in descriptive analysis.</span><span lang="IN"> The </span><span>research </span><span lang="IN">result show</span><span>s</span><span lang="IN"> that</span><span>:</span><span lang="IN"> (1) </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">average income of the HKm farmer</span><span>s</span><span lang="IN"> is Rp</span><span lang="IN">1</span><span>,</span><span lang="IN">739</span><span>,</span><span lang="IN">677 per month/ha and 59</span><span>.</span><span lang="IN">8% of farmers are </span><span>above</span><span lang="IN"> the poverty line; (2) the farmers are increasingly aware of education (there are only 5</span><span>.</span><span lang="IN">9% </span><span>members of </span><span lang="IN">farmer’s family who are uneducated) and the</span><span> lack of</span><span>firewood utilization</span><span lang="IN"> (there are only 23</span><span>.</span><span lang="IN">5% farmers who are still using </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">firewood); and (3) </span><span>in the period of</span><span lang="IN"> 2008 to 2015 the </span><span>average </span><span lang="IN">income </span><span>of the farmers </span><span lang="IN">per month increases</span><span> at</span><span lang="IN"> 52,03%; </span><span>the poverty level decreases at </span><span lang="IN">46</span><span>.</span><span lang="IN">5%, and </span><span>there is a behavior change in which</span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">dependence on </span><span>the </span><span lang="IN">forest resources </span><span>in the form of</span><span lang="IN"> firewood decreases</span></em>
topic ommunity forestry, income, poverty, behavior change
url http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jejak/article/view/7185
work_keys_str_mv AT rykenandini impactofcommunityforestrypolicyonfarmersinrinjaniprotectedforestarea
AT ambarkusumandari impactofcommunityforestrypolicyonfarmersinrinjaniprotectedforestarea
AT totokgunawan impactofcommunityforestrypolicyonfarmersinrinjaniprotectedforestarea
AT ronggosadono impactofcommunityforestrypolicyonfarmersinrinjaniprotectedforestarea
_version_ 1725029926128582656