Does Reconstruction with Reimplantation of Sterilized Tumor Bone Provide Survival Benefit in Diaphyseal Osteosarcoma?

Does reimplantation of sterilized tumor bone for reconstruction provide outcome benefits in intercalary osteosarcoma based on the potential immunogenic effect of reimplanted sterilized tumor tissue? Of 720 cases of surgically treated high-grade osteosarcoma patients treated at our institute from 200...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prakash Nayak, Ashish Gulia, Ajay Puri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:Sarcoma
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4092790
id doaj-07c1f94ad64f499eb5953807df56d1be
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07c1f94ad64f499eb5953807df56d1be2020-11-25T00:11:29ZengHindawi LimitedSarcoma1357-714X1369-16432020-01-01202010.1155/2020/40927904092790Does Reconstruction with Reimplantation of Sterilized Tumor Bone Provide Survival Benefit in Diaphyseal Osteosarcoma?Prakash Nayak0Ashish Gulia1Ajay Puri2Department of Surgical Oncology, Bone and Soft Tissue Disease Management Group, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai 400012, IndiaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Bone and Soft Tissue Disease Management Group, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai 400012, IndiaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Bone and Soft Tissue Disease Management Group, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai 400012, IndiaDoes reimplantation of sterilized tumor bone for reconstruction provide outcome benefits in intercalary osteosarcoma based on the potential immunogenic effect of reimplanted sterilized tumor tissue? Of 720 cases of surgically treated high-grade osteosarcoma patients treated at our institute from 2006 to 2013, 61 had predominantly diaphyseal disease. All patients were nonmetastatic at presentation. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment details, and local recurrence-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival were compared for 24 patients who had reconstruction with sterilized tumor bone reimplantation vs 37 who did not. Both the groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics. Means were compared with the t-test, proportions with the chi-square test, and survival with the log-rank test. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to construct time to event curves. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was employed for multivariate time to event analysis. Twenty-two had extracorporeal radiation and reimplantation (ECRT) with or without the vascularised fibula. Fifty-gray single dose was used in all cases. Two had pasteurization and reimplantation. Thirty seven had non-reimplantation reconstructions (including intercalary or osteoarticular endoprosthesis, pedicled bone grafts, rotation-plasty, and amputations). Five-year local recurrence-free survival was 85% for reimplantation and 97% for non-reimplantation groups (p=0.17). Five-year metastasis-free survival was 63% and 54%, respectively (p=0.44). Five-year overall survival was 70% and 58%, respectively (p=0.39). The data from this study did not demonstrate significantly better local recurrence-free, distant relapse-free, or overall survival benefit in the tumor bone reimplantation group.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4092790
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Prakash Nayak
Ashish Gulia
Ajay Puri
spellingShingle Prakash Nayak
Ashish Gulia
Ajay Puri
Does Reconstruction with Reimplantation of Sterilized Tumor Bone Provide Survival Benefit in Diaphyseal Osteosarcoma?
Sarcoma
author_facet Prakash Nayak
Ashish Gulia
Ajay Puri
author_sort Prakash Nayak
title Does Reconstruction with Reimplantation of Sterilized Tumor Bone Provide Survival Benefit in Diaphyseal Osteosarcoma?
title_short Does Reconstruction with Reimplantation of Sterilized Tumor Bone Provide Survival Benefit in Diaphyseal Osteosarcoma?
title_full Does Reconstruction with Reimplantation of Sterilized Tumor Bone Provide Survival Benefit in Diaphyseal Osteosarcoma?
title_fullStr Does Reconstruction with Reimplantation of Sterilized Tumor Bone Provide Survival Benefit in Diaphyseal Osteosarcoma?
title_full_unstemmed Does Reconstruction with Reimplantation of Sterilized Tumor Bone Provide Survival Benefit in Diaphyseal Osteosarcoma?
title_sort does reconstruction with reimplantation of sterilized tumor bone provide survival benefit in diaphyseal osteosarcoma?
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Sarcoma
issn 1357-714X
1369-1643
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Does reimplantation of sterilized tumor bone for reconstruction provide outcome benefits in intercalary osteosarcoma based on the potential immunogenic effect of reimplanted sterilized tumor tissue? Of 720 cases of surgically treated high-grade osteosarcoma patients treated at our institute from 2006 to 2013, 61 had predominantly diaphyseal disease. All patients were nonmetastatic at presentation. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment details, and local recurrence-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival were compared for 24 patients who had reconstruction with sterilized tumor bone reimplantation vs 37 who did not. Both the groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics. Means were compared with the t-test, proportions with the chi-square test, and survival with the log-rank test. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to construct time to event curves. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was employed for multivariate time to event analysis. Twenty-two had extracorporeal radiation and reimplantation (ECRT) with or without the vascularised fibula. Fifty-gray single dose was used in all cases. Two had pasteurization and reimplantation. Thirty seven had non-reimplantation reconstructions (including intercalary or osteoarticular endoprosthesis, pedicled bone grafts, rotation-plasty, and amputations). Five-year local recurrence-free survival was 85% for reimplantation and 97% for non-reimplantation groups (p=0.17). Five-year metastasis-free survival was 63% and 54%, respectively (p=0.44). Five-year overall survival was 70% and 58%, respectively (p=0.39). The data from this study did not demonstrate significantly better local recurrence-free, distant relapse-free, or overall survival benefit in the tumor bone reimplantation group.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4092790
work_keys_str_mv AT prakashnayak doesreconstructionwithreimplantationofsterilizedtumorboneprovidesurvivalbenefitindiaphysealosteosarcoma
AT ashishgulia doesreconstructionwithreimplantationofsterilizedtumorboneprovidesurvivalbenefitindiaphysealosteosarcoma
AT ajaypuri doesreconstructionwithreimplantationofsterilizedtumorboneprovidesurvivalbenefitindiaphysealosteosarcoma
_version_ 1716211320980766720