Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis (strain NBA)

Abstract The food enzyme alpha‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with a genetically modified strain of Bacillus subtilis strain NBA by DSM Food Specialities B.V. This α‐amylase is intended to be used in baking processes. The genetic modifications do not give rise to saf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Processing Aids (CEP), Vittorio Silano, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Beat Johannes Brüschweiler, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Riccardo Crebelli, David Michael Gott, Konrad Grob, Evgenia Lampi, Alicja Mortensen, Gilles Rivière, Inger‐Lise Steffensen, Christina Tlustos, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Holger Zorn, Lieve Herman, André Penninks, Davor Želježic, Magdalena Andryszkiewicz, Davide Arcella, Yi Liu, Karl‐Heinz Engel, Andrew Chesson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-05-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5681
id doaj-07f1f62f5cea4186b93e742ef339a71e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07f1f62f5cea4186b93e742ef339a71e2021-05-03T02:29:20ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322019-05-01175n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5681Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis (strain NBA)EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Processing Aids (CEP)Vittorio SilanoJosé Manuel Barat BavieraClaudia BolognesiBeat Johannes BrüschweilerPier Sandro CocconcelliRiccardo CrebelliDavid Michael GottKonrad GrobEvgenia LampiAlicja MortensenGilles RivièreInger‐Lise SteffensenChristina TlustosHenk Van LoverenLaurence VernisHolger ZornLieve HermanAndré PenninksDavor ŽelježicMagdalena AndryszkiewiczDavide ArcellaYi LiuKarl‐Heinz EngelAndrew ChessonAbstract The food enzyme alpha‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with a genetically modified strain of Bacillus subtilis strain NBA by DSM Food Specialities B.V. This α‐amylase is intended to be used in baking processes. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns and the food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and recombinant DNA. The parental strain meets the required qualifications to be considered as a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) organism and is therefore presumed to be safe. Since the production strain is not cytotoxic and since the introduced genetic modifications do not raise safety concerns, the presumption of safety made for the parental strain is extended to the production strain. The conclusions on safety of the food enzyme are made following the QPS approach in relation to the production strain, with additional consideration of the conditions of manufacture. However, the Panel considers no toxicological studies other than assessment of allergenicity necessary. This is based on the QPS status of the production strain and the absence of any hazards from the product and downstream processing. Based on the maximum use level recommended for the baking processes and individual data from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database, dietary exposure was estimated to be up to 0.093 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions upon dietary exposure to this food enzyme cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is considered low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not raise safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5681food enzymealpha‐amylase4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolaseEC 3.2.1.11,4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolaseBacillus subtilis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Processing Aids (CEP)
Vittorio Silano
José Manuel Barat Baviera
Claudia Bolognesi
Beat Johannes Brüschweiler
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Riccardo Crebelli
David Michael Gott
Konrad Grob
Evgenia Lampi
Alicja Mortensen
Gilles Rivière
Inger‐Lise Steffensen
Christina Tlustos
Henk Van Loveren
Laurence Vernis
Holger Zorn
Lieve Herman
André Penninks
Davor Želježic
Magdalena Andryszkiewicz
Davide Arcella
Yi Liu
Karl‐Heinz Engel
Andrew Chesson
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Processing Aids (CEP)
Vittorio Silano
José Manuel Barat Baviera
Claudia Bolognesi
Beat Johannes Brüschweiler
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Riccardo Crebelli
David Michael Gott
Konrad Grob
Evgenia Lampi
Alicja Mortensen
Gilles Rivière
Inger‐Lise Steffensen
Christina Tlustos
Henk Van Loveren
Laurence Vernis
Holger Zorn
Lieve Herman
André Penninks
Davor Želježic
Magdalena Andryszkiewicz
Davide Arcella
Yi Liu
Karl‐Heinz Engel
Andrew Chesson
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis (strain NBA)
EFSA Journal
food enzyme
alpha‐amylase
4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase
EC 3.2.1.1
1,4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase
Bacillus subtilis
author_facet EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Processing Aids (CEP)
Vittorio Silano
José Manuel Barat Baviera
Claudia Bolognesi
Beat Johannes Brüschweiler
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Riccardo Crebelli
David Michael Gott
Konrad Grob
Evgenia Lampi
Alicja Mortensen
Gilles Rivière
Inger‐Lise Steffensen
Christina Tlustos
Henk Van Loveren
Laurence Vernis
Holger Zorn
Lieve Herman
André Penninks
Davor Želježic
Magdalena Andryszkiewicz
Davide Arcella
Yi Liu
Karl‐Heinz Engel
Andrew Chesson
author_sort EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Processing Aids (CEP)
title Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis (strain NBA)
title_short Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis (strain NBA)
title_full Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis (strain NBA)
title_fullStr Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis (strain NBA)
title_full_unstemmed Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis (strain NBA)
title_sort safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified bacillus subtilis (strain nba)
publisher Wiley
series EFSA Journal
issn 1831-4732
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Abstract The food enzyme alpha‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with a genetically modified strain of Bacillus subtilis strain NBA by DSM Food Specialities B.V. This α‐amylase is intended to be used in baking processes. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns and the food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and recombinant DNA. The parental strain meets the required qualifications to be considered as a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) organism and is therefore presumed to be safe. Since the production strain is not cytotoxic and since the introduced genetic modifications do not raise safety concerns, the presumption of safety made for the parental strain is extended to the production strain. The conclusions on safety of the food enzyme are made following the QPS approach in relation to the production strain, with additional consideration of the conditions of manufacture. However, the Panel considers no toxicological studies other than assessment of allergenicity necessary. This is based on the QPS status of the production strain and the absence of any hazards from the product and downstream processing. Based on the maximum use level recommended for the baking processes and individual data from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database, dietary exposure was estimated to be up to 0.093 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions upon dietary exposure to this food enzyme cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is considered low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not raise safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.
topic food enzyme
alpha‐amylase
4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase
EC 3.2.1.1
1,4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase
Bacillus subtilis
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5681
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonfoodcontactmaterialsenzymesprocessingaidscep safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT vittoriosilano safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT josemanuelbaratbaviera safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT claudiabolognesi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT beatjohannesbruschweiler safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT piersandrococconcelli safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT riccardocrebelli safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT davidmichaelgott safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT konradgrob safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT evgenialampi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT alicjamortensen safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT gillesriviere safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT ingerlisesteffensen safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT christinatlustos safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT henkvanloveren safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT laurencevernis safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT holgerzorn safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT lieveherman safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT andrepenninks safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT davorzeljezic safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT magdalenaandryszkiewicz safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT davidearcella safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT yiliu safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT karlheinzengel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
AT andrewchesson safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstrainnba
_version_ 1721485197310951424