Microleakage of three self-etch bonding agents in class 5 composite cavities

• Main Authors: Saeed Nemati Anaraki, Hamed Karkehabadi, Nazanin Zeinab Garshasb Zadeh
• Format: Article
• Language: fas
• Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2016-07-01
• Series: Journal of Dental Medicine
• Subjects: Leakage; Bonding agents; Self etch
• Online Access: http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-822&slc_lang=en&sid=1

Background and Aims: Microleakage is one of the most common problems in bonding systems, which cause different clinical shortcomings such as post operative sensitivity, marginal discoloration and pulp necrosis that can decrease those using bonding systems. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of three self etch bonding agents (generation 6 and 7) in class 5 composite cavities. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, 30 facial class 5 cavities were prepared in 30 human premolar teeth which were freshly extracted for orthodontic purposes. Cl V cavities were prepared in 2*3*2 mm dimensions. Occlusal margins were in enamel and gingival ones in cementum and randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 each. Then the cavities were treated by clearhil SE Bond (Kuraray, Japan), G Bond (GC, Japan), and Opti Bond Solo Plus (Kerr, USA), according to the manufacturers’ insductions. Then the cavities were filled using Z100 resin composite. The specimens were then immersed in a 50% AgNo solution for 24 hrs. Then, the teeth were cut buccolingually to be evaluated for dye penetration with stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: This study revealed that Opti bond solo plus had type1 microleakage (dye penetration up to 1/3 of cavity) in 80% of specimen, and type 4 microleakage (along axial wall) in 10%. Clearfil SE bond had no leakage in 50%, type1 in 40% and type 2 (up to 2/3 of cavity) in 10%. But there was no significant difference in the microleakage at the gingival margins between 3 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Clearfil SE Bond and G bond could prevent microleakage more effectively than that of Opti Bond Solo Plus on the occlusal margins. However, no difference in the microleakage on the gingival surfaces was found.