Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda
Supply chain disruptions have serious consequences for society and this has made supply chain risk management (SCRM) an attractive area for researchers and managers. In this paper, we use an objective literature mapping approach to identify, classify, and analyze decision-making models and support s...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-05-01
|
Series: | European Research on Management and Business Economics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883418302602 |
id |
doaj-08127f1fd85144fd9e304541e5dacb2a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-08127f1fd85144fd9e304541e5dacb2a2020-11-25T03:09:23ZspaElsevierEuropean Research on Management and Business Economics2444-88342020-05-012626370Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agendaMarcus Vinicius Carvalho Fagundes0Eduardo Oliveira Teles1Silvio A.B. Vieira de Melo2Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires3Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), PhD candidate of the Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI), Salvador, State of Bahia, Brazil; Corresponding author. Present address: Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering, Polytechnic School of the Federal University of Bahia, Aristides Novis st., nº 2, 6º Floor – Federação, CEP 40.210-630, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.Federal Institute of Bahia (IFBA), Camaçari, State of Bahia, BrazilFederal University of Bahia (UFBA), Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI), and Interdisciplinary Center on Energy and Environment (CIENAM), Salvador, State of Bahia, BrazilFederal University of Bahia (UFBA), Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI), Salvador, State of Bahia, BrazilSupply chain disruptions have serious consequences for society and this has made supply chain risk management (SCRM) an attractive area for researchers and managers. In this paper, we use an objective literature mapping approach to identify, classify, and analyze decision-making models and support systems for SCRM, providing an agenda for future research. Through bibliometric networks of articles published in the Scopus database, we analyze the most influential decision-making models and support systems for SCRM, evaluate the main areas of current research, and provide insights for future research in this field. The main results are the following: we found that the identity of the area is structured in three groups of risk decision support models: (i) quantitative multicriteria decision models, (ii) stochastic decision-making models, and (iii) computational simulation/optimization models. We mapped six current research clusters: (i) conceptual and qualitative risk models, (ii) upstream supply chain risk models, (iii) downstream supply chain risk models, (iv) supply chain sustainability risk models, (v) stochastic and multicriteria decision risk models, and (vi) emerging techniques risk models. We identified seven future research clusters, with insights from further studies for: (i) tools to operate SCRM data, (ii) validation of risk models, (iii) computational improvement for data analysis, (iv) multi-level and multi-period supply chains, (v) agrifood risks, (vi) energy risks and (vii) sustainability risks. Finally, the future research agenda should prioritize SCRM's holistic vision, the relationship between Big Data, Industry 4.0 and SCRM, as well as emerging social and environmental risks.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883418302602C500C610C630M110 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marcus Vinicius Carvalho Fagundes Eduardo Oliveira Teles Silvio A.B. Vieira de Melo Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires |
spellingShingle |
Marcus Vinicius Carvalho Fagundes Eduardo Oliveira Teles Silvio A.B. Vieira de Melo Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda European Research on Management and Business Economics C500 C610 C630 M110 |
author_facet |
Marcus Vinicius Carvalho Fagundes Eduardo Oliveira Teles Silvio A.B. Vieira de Melo Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires |
author_sort |
Marcus Vinicius Carvalho Fagundes |
title |
Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda |
title_short |
Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda |
title_full |
Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda |
title_fullStr |
Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda |
title_full_unstemmed |
Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda |
title_sort |
decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
European Research on Management and Business Economics |
issn |
2444-8834 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
Supply chain disruptions have serious consequences for society and this has made supply chain risk management (SCRM) an attractive area for researchers and managers. In this paper, we use an objective literature mapping approach to identify, classify, and analyze decision-making models and support systems for SCRM, providing an agenda for future research. Through bibliometric networks of articles published in the Scopus database, we analyze the most influential decision-making models and support systems for SCRM, evaluate the main areas of current research, and provide insights for future research in this field. The main results are the following: we found that the identity of the area is structured in three groups of risk decision support models: (i) quantitative multicriteria decision models, (ii) stochastic decision-making models, and (iii) computational simulation/optimization models. We mapped six current research clusters: (i) conceptual and qualitative risk models, (ii) upstream supply chain risk models, (iii) downstream supply chain risk models, (iv) supply chain sustainability risk models, (v) stochastic and multicriteria decision risk models, and (vi) emerging techniques risk models. We identified seven future research clusters, with insights from further studies for: (i) tools to operate SCRM data, (ii) validation of risk models, (iii) computational improvement for data analysis, (iv) multi-level and multi-period supply chains, (v) agrifood risks, (vi) energy risks and (vii) sustainability risks. Finally, the future research agenda should prioritize SCRM's holistic vision, the relationship between Big Data, Industry 4.0 and SCRM, as well as emerging social and environmental risks. |
topic |
C500 C610 C630 M110 |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883418302602 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marcusviniciuscarvalhofagundes decisionmakingmodelsandsupportsystemsforsupplychainriskliteraturemappingandfutureresearchagenda AT eduardooliveirateles decisionmakingmodelsandsupportsystemsforsupplychainriskliteraturemappingandfutureresearchagenda AT silvioabvieirademelo decisionmakingmodelsandsupportsystemsforsupplychainriskliteraturemappingandfutureresearchagenda AT franciscogaudenciomendoncafreires decisionmakingmodelsandsupportsystemsforsupplychainriskliteraturemappingandfutureresearchagenda |
_version_ |
1724662850811592704 |