Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda

Supply chain disruptions have serious consequences for society and this has made supply chain risk management (SCRM) an attractive area for researchers and managers. In this paper, we use an objective literature mapping approach to identify, classify, and analyze decision-making models and support s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcus Vinicius Carvalho Fagundes, Eduardo Oliveira Teles, Silvio A.B. Vieira de Melo, Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Elsevier 2020-05-01
Series:European Research on Management and Business Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883418302602
id doaj-08127f1fd85144fd9e304541e5dacb2a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08127f1fd85144fd9e304541e5dacb2a2020-11-25T03:09:23ZspaElsevierEuropean Research on Management and Business Economics2444-88342020-05-012626370Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agendaMarcus Vinicius Carvalho Fagundes0Eduardo Oliveira Teles1Silvio A.B. Vieira de Melo2Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires3Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), PhD candidate of the Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI), Salvador, State of Bahia, Brazil; Corresponding author. Present address: Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering, Polytechnic School of the Federal University of Bahia, Aristides Novis st., nº 2, 6º Floor – Federação, CEP 40.210-630, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.Federal Institute of Bahia (IFBA), Camaçari, State of Bahia, BrazilFederal University of Bahia (UFBA), Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI), and Interdisciplinary Center on Energy and Environment (CIENAM), Salvador, State of Bahia, BrazilFederal University of Bahia (UFBA), Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI), Salvador, State of Bahia, BrazilSupply chain disruptions have serious consequences for society and this has made supply chain risk management (SCRM) an attractive area for researchers and managers. In this paper, we use an objective literature mapping approach to identify, classify, and analyze decision-making models and support systems for SCRM, providing an agenda for future research. Through bibliometric networks of articles published in the Scopus database, we analyze the most influential decision-making models and support systems for SCRM, evaluate the main areas of current research, and provide insights for future research in this field. The main results are the following: we found that the identity of the area is structured in three groups of risk decision support models: (i) quantitative multicriteria decision models, (ii) stochastic decision-making models, and (iii) computational simulation/optimization models. We mapped six current research clusters: (i) conceptual and qualitative risk models, (ii) upstream supply chain risk models, (iii) downstream supply chain risk models, (iv) supply chain sustainability risk models, (v) stochastic and multicriteria decision risk models, and (vi) emerging techniques risk models. We identified seven future research clusters, with insights from further studies for: (i) tools to operate SCRM data, (ii) validation of risk models, (iii) computational improvement for data analysis, (iv) multi-level and multi-period supply chains, (v) agrifood risks, (vi) energy risks and (vii) sustainability risks. Finally, the future research agenda should prioritize SCRM's holistic vision, the relationship between Big Data, Industry 4.0 and SCRM, as well as emerging social and environmental risks.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883418302602C500C610C630M110
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marcus Vinicius Carvalho Fagundes
Eduardo Oliveira Teles
Silvio A.B. Vieira de Melo
Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires
spellingShingle Marcus Vinicius Carvalho Fagundes
Eduardo Oliveira Teles
Silvio A.B. Vieira de Melo
Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires
Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda
European Research on Management and Business Economics
C500
C610
C630
M110
author_facet Marcus Vinicius Carvalho Fagundes
Eduardo Oliveira Teles
Silvio A.B. Vieira de Melo
Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires
author_sort Marcus Vinicius Carvalho Fagundes
title Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda
title_short Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda
title_full Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda
title_fullStr Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda
title_full_unstemmed Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda
title_sort decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda
publisher Elsevier
series European Research on Management and Business Economics
issn 2444-8834
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Supply chain disruptions have serious consequences for society and this has made supply chain risk management (SCRM) an attractive area for researchers and managers. In this paper, we use an objective literature mapping approach to identify, classify, and analyze decision-making models and support systems for SCRM, providing an agenda for future research. Through bibliometric networks of articles published in the Scopus database, we analyze the most influential decision-making models and support systems for SCRM, evaluate the main areas of current research, and provide insights for future research in this field. The main results are the following: we found that the identity of the area is structured in three groups of risk decision support models: (i) quantitative multicriteria decision models, (ii) stochastic decision-making models, and (iii) computational simulation/optimization models. We mapped six current research clusters: (i) conceptual and qualitative risk models, (ii) upstream supply chain risk models, (iii) downstream supply chain risk models, (iv) supply chain sustainability risk models, (v) stochastic and multicriteria decision risk models, and (vi) emerging techniques risk models. We identified seven future research clusters, with insights from further studies for: (i) tools to operate SCRM data, (ii) validation of risk models, (iii) computational improvement for data analysis, (iv) multi-level and multi-period supply chains, (v) agrifood risks, (vi) energy risks and (vii) sustainability risks. Finally, the future research agenda should prioritize SCRM's holistic vision, the relationship between Big Data, Industry 4.0 and SCRM, as well as emerging social and environmental risks.
topic C500
C610
C630
M110
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883418302602
work_keys_str_mv AT marcusviniciuscarvalhofagundes decisionmakingmodelsandsupportsystemsforsupplychainriskliteraturemappingandfutureresearchagenda
AT eduardooliveirateles decisionmakingmodelsandsupportsystemsforsupplychainriskliteraturemappingandfutureresearchagenda
AT silvioabvieirademelo decisionmakingmodelsandsupportsystemsforsupplychainriskliteraturemappingandfutureresearchagenda
AT franciscogaudenciomendoncafreires decisionmakingmodelsandsupportsystemsforsupplychainriskliteraturemappingandfutureresearchagenda
_version_ 1724662850811592704