Outcome of Re-Using radiofrequency ablation catheter for varicose veins treatment

Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the success of re-use by assessing the recanalization rates following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with Closure Fast® catheter in patients with symptomatic varicose veins. Methods: This retrospective study approved by the institutional review boa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edwin Stephen, Albert Abhinay Kota, Deepak George John, Vimalin Samuel, Andrew Dheepak Selvaraj, Prabhu Premkumar, Sunil Agarwal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indjvascsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0972-0820;year=2020;volume=7;issue=2;spage=154;epage=157;aulast=Stephen
id doaj-083364a075474df9bc849af6cea2efa2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-083364a075474df9bc849af6cea2efa22020-11-25T03:24:35ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery0972-08202394-09992020-01-017215415710.4103/ijves.ijves_30_20Outcome of Re-Using radiofrequency ablation catheter for varicose veins treatmentEdwin StephenAlbert Abhinay KotaDeepak George JohnVimalin SamuelAndrew Dheepak SelvarajPrabhu PremkumarSunil AgarwalObjective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the success of re-use by assessing the recanalization rates following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with Closure Fast® catheter in patients with symptomatic varicose veins. Methods: This retrospective study approved by the institutional review board analyzed the occlusion rates of the great saphenous vein (GSV) in patients who underwent RFA between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. A record of the number of times the RFA catheter was re-used was maintained. The catheter was used for a maximum of five systems. Follow-up was performed postoperatively at 1 week and 6 months with an ultrasound to assess failure by looking for recanalization. Results: In this study, 272 GSV endoablations (RFA) were performed in 238 patients. The mean age was 47.68 (standard deviation ± 13.05). Majority of the patients were male (76.9%). 27.3% (73 GSV) of the venous systems received a first fire with the RFA catheter. At the first follow-up on week 1, 97.7% (266 GSV systems) had complete occlusion, 2.3% (6 GSV systems) had partial recanalization, and none had complete failure. Recanalization rates at 1 week with 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th re-use were 0%, 2%, 2%. 4.1%, and 3.8%, respectively. At 6-month postoperative follow-up, 96.5% (250) had complete occlusion, 2.7% (7) had partial recanalization, and 0.8% (2) had complete recanalization. Recanalization rates at 6 weeks with 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th re-use were 1.4%, 2.1%, 2.3%. 6.4%, 5.9% respectively. There was no statistical significance with the recanalization rates at 1st week and at 6 weeks. 4.2% (10) of the patients were lost to follow-up. None of the patients had any complications. Conclusion: The results of GSV occlusion rates are encouraging when the RFA catheter was re-used and cut the cost of treatment substantially, thereby making RFA ablation more affordable to the common human.http://www.indjvascsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0972-0820;year=2020;volume=7;issue=2;spage=154;epage=157;aulast=Stephenablationclosure fastradiofrequencyradiofrequency ablationvaricose veinsvnus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edwin Stephen
Albert Abhinay Kota
Deepak George John
Vimalin Samuel
Andrew Dheepak Selvaraj
Prabhu Premkumar
Sunil Agarwal
spellingShingle Edwin Stephen
Albert Abhinay Kota
Deepak George John
Vimalin Samuel
Andrew Dheepak Selvaraj
Prabhu Premkumar
Sunil Agarwal
Outcome of Re-Using radiofrequency ablation catheter for varicose veins treatment
Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
ablation
closure fast
radiofrequency
radiofrequency ablation
varicose veins
vnus
author_facet Edwin Stephen
Albert Abhinay Kota
Deepak George John
Vimalin Samuel
Andrew Dheepak Selvaraj
Prabhu Premkumar
Sunil Agarwal
author_sort Edwin Stephen
title Outcome of Re-Using radiofrequency ablation catheter for varicose veins treatment
title_short Outcome of Re-Using radiofrequency ablation catheter for varicose veins treatment
title_full Outcome of Re-Using radiofrequency ablation catheter for varicose veins treatment
title_fullStr Outcome of Re-Using radiofrequency ablation catheter for varicose veins treatment
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of Re-Using radiofrequency ablation catheter for varicose veins treatment
title_sort outcome of re-using radiofrequency ablation catheter for varicose veins treatment
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
issn 0972-0820
2394-0999
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the success of re-use by assessing the recanalization rates following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with Closure Fast® catheter in patients with symptomatic varicose veins. Methods: This retrospective study approved by the institutional review board analyzed the occlusion rates of the great saphenous vein (GSV) in patients who underwent RFA between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. A record of the number of times the RFA catheter was re-used was maintained. The catheter was used for a maximum of five systems. Follow-up was performed postoperatively at 1 week and 6 months with an ultrasound to assess failure by looking for recanalization. Results: In this study, 272 GSV endoablations (RFA) were performed in 238 patients. The mean age was 47.68 (standard deviation ± 13.05). Majority of the patients were male (76.9%). 27.3% (73 GSV) of the venous systems received a first fire with the RFA catheter. At the first follow-up on week 1, 97.7% (266 GSV systems) had complete occlusion, 2.3% (6 GSV systems) had partial recanalization, and none had complete failure. Recanalization rates at 1 week with 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th re-use were 0%, 2%, 2%. 4.1%, and 3.8%, respectively. At 6-month postoperative follow-up, 96.5% (250) had complete occlusion, 2.7% (7) had partial recanalization, and 0.8% (2) had complete recanalization. Recanalization rates at 6 weeks with 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th re-use were 1.4%, 2.1%, 2.3%. 6.4%, 5.9% respectively. There was no statistical significance with the recanalization rates at 1st week and at 6 weeks. 4.2% (10) of the patients were lost to follow-up. None of the patients had any complications. Conclusion: The results of GSV occlusion rates are encouraging when the RFA catheter was re-used and cut the cost of treatment substantially, thereby making RFA ablation more affordable to the common human.
topic ablation
closure fast
radiofrequency
radiofrequency ablation
varicose veins
vnus
url http://www.indjvascsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0972-0820;year=2020;volume=7;issue=2;spage=154;epage=157;aulast=Stephen
work_keys_str_mv AT edwinstephen outcomeofreusingradiofrequencyablationcatheterforvaricoseveinstreatment
AT albertabhinaykota outcomeofreusingradiofrequencyablationcatheterforvaricoseveinstreatment
AT deepakgeorgejohn outcomeofreusingradiofrequencyablationcatheterforvaricoseveinstreatment
AT vimalinsamuel outcomeofreusingradiofrequencyablationcatheterforvaricoseveinstreatment
AT andrewdheepakselvaraj outcomeofreusingradiofrequencyablationcatheterforvaricoseveinstreatment
AT prabhupremkumar outcomeofreusingradiofrequencyablationcatheterforvaricoseveinstreatment
AT sunilagarwal outcomeofreusingradiofrequencyablationcatheterforvaricoseveinstreatment
_version_ 1724601411650453504