Comparison of miRNA quantitation by Nanostring in serum and plasma samples.

Circulating microRNAs that are associated with specific diseases have garnered much attention for use in diagnostic assays. However, detection of disease-associated miRNA can be affected by several factors such as release of contaminating cellular miRNA during sample collection, variations due to am...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catherine Foye, Irene K Yan, Waseem David, Neha Shukla, Yacob Habboush, Lori Chase, Kristen Ryland, Vivek Kesari, Tushar Patel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5718466?pdf=render
id doaj-0834f96310884aa4a791e16bdabc4bcd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0834f96310884aa4a791e16bdabc4bcd2020-11-24T20:40:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-011212e018916510.1371/journal.pone.0189165Comparison of miRNA quantitation by Nanostring in serum and plasma samples.Catherine FoyeIrene K YanWaseem DavidNeha ShuklaYacob HabboushLori ChaseKristen RylandVivek KesariTushar PatelCirculating microRNAs that are associated with specific diseases have garnered much attention for use in diagnostic assays. However, detection of disease-associated miRNA can be affected by several factors such as release of contaminating cellular miRNA during sample collection, variations due to amplification of transcript for detection, or controls used for normalization for accurate quantitation. We analyzed circulating miRNA in serum and plasma samples obtained concurrently from 28 patients, using a Nanostring quantitative assay platform. Total RNA concentration ranged from 32-125 μg/ml from serum and 30-220 μg/ml from plasma. Of 798 miRNAs, 371 miRNAs were not detected in either serum or plasma samples. 427 were detected in either serum or plasma but not both, whereas 151 miRNA were detected in both serum and plasma samples. The diversity of miRNA detected was greater in plasma than in serum samples. In serum samples, the number of detected miRNA ranged from 3 to 82 with a median of 17, whereas in plasma samples, the number of miRNA detected ranged from 25 to 221 with a median of 91. Several miRNA such as miR451a, miR 16-5p, miR-223-3p, and mir25-3p were highly abundant and differentially expressed between serum and plasma. The detection of endogenous and exogenous control miRNAs varied in serum and plasma, with higher levels observed in plasma. Gene expression stability identified candidate invariant microRNA that were highly stable across all samples, and could be used for normalization. In conclusion, there are significant differences in both the number of miRNA detected and the amount of miRNA detected between serum and plasma. Normalization using miRNA with constant expression is essential to minimize the impact of technical variations. Given the challenges involved, ideal candidates for blood based biomarkers would be those that are indifferent to type of body fluid, are detectable and can be reliably quantitated.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5718466?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Catherine Foye
Irene K Yan
Waseem David
Neha Shukla
Yacob Habboush
Lori Chase
Kristen Ryland
Vivek Kesari
Tushar Patel
spellingShingle Catherine Foye
Irene K Yan
Waseem David
Neha Shukla
Yacob Habboush
Lori Chase
Kristen Ryland
Vivek Kesari
Tushar Patel
Comparison of miRNA quantitation by Nanostring in serum and plasma samples.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Catherine Foye
Irene K Yan
Waseem David
Neha Shukla
Yacob Habboush
Lori Chase
Kristen Ryland
Vivek Kesari
Tushar Patel
author_sort Catherine Foye
title Comparison of miRNA quantitation by Nanostring in serum and plasma samples.
title_short Comparison of miRNA quantitation by Nanostring in serum and plasma samples.
title_full Comparison of miRNA quantitation by Nanostring in serum and plasma samples.
title_fullStr Comparison of miRNA quantitation by Nanostring in serum and plasma samples.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of miRNA quantitation by Nanostring in serum and plasma samples.
title_sort comparison of mirna quantitation by nanostring in serum and plasma samples.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Circulating microRNAs that are associated with specific diseases have garnered much attention for use in diagnostic assays. However, detection of disease-associated miRNA can be affected by several factors such as release of contaminating cellular miRNA during sample collection, variations due to amplification of transcript for detection, or controls used for normalization for accurate quantitation. We analyzed circulating miRNA in serum and plasma samples obtained concurrently from 28 patients, using a Nanostring quantitative assay platform. Total RNA concentration ranged from 32-125 μg/ml from serum and 30-220 μg/ml from plasma. Of 798 miRNAs, 371 miRNAs were not detected in either serum or plasma samples. 427 were detected in either serum or plasma but not both, whereas 151 miRNA were detected in both serum and plasma samples. The diversity of miRNA detected was greater in plasma than in serum samples. In serum samples, the number of detected miRNA ranged from 3 to 82 with a median of 17, whereas in plasma samples, the number of miRNA detected ranged from 25 to 221 with a median of 91. Several miRNA such as miR451a, miR 16-5p, miR-223-3p, and mir25-3p were highly abundant and differentially expressed between serum and plasma. The detection of endogenous and exogenous control miRNAs varied in serum and plasma, with higher levels observed in plasma. Gene expression stability identified candidate invariant microRNA that were highly stable across all samples, and could be used for normalization. In conclusion, there are significant differences in both the number of miRNA detected and the amount of miRNA detected between serum and plasma. Normalization using miRNA with constant expression is essential to minimize the impact of technical variations. Given the challenges involved, ideal candidates for blood based biomarkers would be those that are indifferent to type of body fluid, are detectable and can be reliably quantitated.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5718466?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT catherinefoye comparisonofmirnaquantitationbynanostringinserumandplasmasamples
AT irenekyan comparisonofmirnaquantitationbynanostringinserumandplasmasamples
AT waseemdavid comparisonofmirnaquantitationbynanostringinserumandplasmasamples
AT nehashukla comparisonofmirnaquantitationbynanostringinserumandplasmasamples
AT yacobhabboush comparisonofmirnaquantitationbynanostringinserumandplasmasamples
AT lorichase comparisonofmirnaquantitationbynanostringinserumandplasmasamples
AT kristenryland comparisonofmirnaquantitationbynanostringinserumandplasmasamples
AT vivekkesari comparisonofmirnaquantitationbynanostringinserumandplasmasamples
AT tusharpatel comparisonofmirnaquantitationbynanostringinserumandplasmasamples
_version_ 1716827332227891200