On-farm diversification strategies and improved welfare of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer: Fallacy or realism?†
The promise and role of livelihood diversification has been taken up globally in the pursuit of mitigating risks confronting the immiserated rural smallholder farmer to improve living standards and viewed as paramount to advancing the welfare and prosperity of same. Yet, due to an apparent shift in...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Cogent Social Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1865609 |
id |
doaj-0848aa6e5a194a10a1d68d4e3bf4ea10 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0848aa6e5a194a10a1d68d4e3bf4ea102021-01-15T14:43:41ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Social Sciences2331-18862021-01-017110.1080/23311886.2020.18656091865609On-farm diversification strategies and improved welfare of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer: Fallacy or realism?†Lawrence G. Boakye0Collins K. Osei1Serekye Y. Annor2Independent Scholar & Development ProfessionalFaculty of Agriculture, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and TechnologyCollege of Agriculture Education, Asante-Mampong, University of EducationThe promise and role of livelihood diversification has been taken up globally in the pursuit of mitigating risks confronting the immiserated rural smallholder farmer to improve living standards and viewed as paramount to advancing the welfare and prosperity of same. Yet, due to an apparent shift in interest and attention from on-farm to off-farm activities, much has not been documented on the impact of on-farm livelihood diversification strategies. Through the lens of a grasscutter domestication scheme implemented in Ghana by the Ghana Country Programme of ActionAid International, this paper explores the impact of such on-farm strategies on the welfare and livelihood of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer. Employing a focus group discussion to interview the beneficiaries, the paper identifies increased and alternative source of income, improved diet, and source of employment as major benefits of the scheme to report an apparent capacity and utility of on-farm livelihood diversification strategies to the socioeconomic empowerment of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer. The paper conveys that with further development through investments and improvements for greater operational efficiency, such strategies could have vast potential in building household capacities to improve living standards and welfare of same, and prove useful to advancing rural poverty reduction, and economic growth and development efforts. Implications are discussed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1865609on-farm livelihood diversificationpoverty reductionrural smallholder farmeragriculture and rural development and policygrasscutter domesticationghana |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lawrence G. Boakye Collins K. Osei Serekye Y. Annor |
spellingShingle |
Lawrence G. Boakye Collins K. Osei Serekye Y. Annor On-farm diversification strategies and improved welfare of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer: Fallacy or realism?† Cogent Social Sciences on-farm livelihood diversification poverty reduction rural smallholder farmer agriculture and rural development and policy grasscutter domestication ghana |
author_facet |
Lawrence G. Boakye Collins K. Osei Serekye Y. Annor |
author_sort |
Lawrence G. Boakye |
title |
On-farm diversification strategies and improved welfare of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer: Fallacy or realism?† |
title_short |
On-farm diversification strategies and improved welfare of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer: Fallacy or realism?† |
title_full |
On-farm diversification strategies and improved welfare of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer: Fallacy or realism?† |
title_fullStr |
On-farm diversification strategies and improved welfare of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer: Fallacy or realism?† |
title_full_unstemmed |
On-farm diversification strategies and improved welfare of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer: Fallacy or realism?† |
title_sort |
on-farm diversification strategies and improved welfare of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer: fallacy or realism?† |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Cogent Social Sciences |
issn |
2331-1886 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
The promise and role of livelihood diversification has been taken up globally in the pursuit of mitigating risks confronting the immiserated rural smallholder farmer to improve living standards and viewed as paramount to advancing the welfare and prosperity of same. Yet, due to an apparent shift in interest and attention from on-farm to off-farm activities, much has not been documented on the impact of on-farm livelihood diversification strategies. Through the lens of a grasscutter domestication scheme implemented in Ghana by the Ghana Country Programme of ActionAid International, this paper explores the impact of such on-farm strategies on the welfare and livelihood of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer. Employing a focus group discussion to interview the beneficiaries, the paper identifies increased and alternative source of income, improved diet, and source of employment as major benefits of the scheme to report an apparent capacity and utility of on-farm livelihood diversification strategies to the socioeconomic empowerment of the immiserated rural smallholder farmer. The paper conveys that with further development through investments and improvements for greater operational efficiency, such strategies could have vast potential in building household capacities to improve living standards and welfare of same, and prove useful to advancing rural poverty reduction, and economic growth and development efforts. Implications are discussed. |
topic |
on-farm livelihood diversification poverty reduction rural smallholder farmer agriculture and rural development and policy grasscutter domestication ghana |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1865609 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lawrencegboakye onfarmdiversificationstrategiesandimprovedwelfareoftheimmiseratedruralsmallholderfarmerfallacyorrealism AT collinskosei onfarmdiversificationstrategiesandimprovedwelfareoftheimmiseratedruralsmallholderfarmerfallacyorrealism AT serekyeyannor onfarmdiversificationstrategiesandimprovedwelfareoftheimmiseratedruralsmallholderfarmerfallacyorrealism |
_version_ |
1724336791974051840 |