Impact of trade liberalisation on formal–informal interlinkages in India: does sectoral labour mobility matter?

Abstract Existing study argues that labour market flexibility accompanied by trade liberalisation helped in building complementary relationship between formal and informal sectors in India. However, no direct relation is established between the labour market flexibility and trade liberalisation with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anirban Kundu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-05-01
Series:Journal of Economic Structures
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40008-020-00217-1
id doaj-08963294a27e440dab0cee4cadf271ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08963294a27e440dab0cee4cadf271ec2020-11-25T03:08:26ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Economic Structures2193-24092020-05-019112910.1186/s40008-020-00217-1Impact of trade liberalisation on formal–informal interlinkages in India: does sectoral labour mobility matter?Anirban Kundu0School of Management, Presidency UniversityAbstract Existing study argues that labour market flexibility accompanied by trade liberalisation helped in building complementary relationship between formal and informal sectors in India. However, no direct relation is established between the labour market flexibility and trade liberalisation with respect to inter- and intra-sectoral movement of labour. The present study enquires whether the extent of labour mobility between and within formal–informal sectors affects the formal–informal growth linkages due to the tariff cut on traded goods, as a part of trade liberalisation in India. The findings based on static CGE analysis indicate that in absence of labour market segmentation (i.e. in absence of both wage rigidity and skill specificity) with full mobility of labour, formal sector growth is higher vis-à-vis the growth of those activities under segmented labour market with full mobility of labour. Amongst growing informal sector activities, output growth is lower in absence of segmented labour market with full mobility of labour. Finally, restricted labour mobility leads to largest expansion of formal activities, but further exacerbates the growth of informal activities. The study reveals that improvement in functional income distribution is mixed across households, depending on the degree of labour mobility, which implies labour market adjustment is costly due to structural reforms, that pitches for government intervention.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40008-020-00217-1Formal–informal interlinkagesTrade liberalisationSegmented labour marketLabour mobilityStatic CGE model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anirban Kundu
spellingShingle Anirban Kundu
Impact of trade liberalisation on formal–informal interlinkages in India: does sectoral labour mobility matter?
Journal of Economic Structures
Formal–informal interlinkages
Trade liberalisation
Segmented labour market
Labour mobility
Static CGE model
author_facet Anirban Kundu
author_sort Anirban Kundu
title Impact of trade liberalisation on formal–informal interlinkages in India: does sectoral labour mobility matter?
title_short Impact of trade liberalisation on formal–informal interlinkages in India: does sectoral labour mobility matter?
title_full Impact of trade liberalisation on formal–informal interlinkages in India: does sectoral labour mobility matter?
title_fullStr Impact of trade liberalisation on formal–informal interlinkages in India: does sectoral labour mobility matter?
title_full_unstemmed Impact of trade liberalisation on formal–informal interlinkages in India: does sectoral labour mobility matter?
title_sort impact of trade liberalisation on formal–informal interlinkages in india: does sectoral labour mobility matter?
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of Economic Structures
issn 2193-2409
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract Existing study argues that labour market flexibility accompanied by trade liberalisation helped in building complementary relationship between formal and informal sectors in India. However, no direct relation is established between the labour market flexibility and trade liberalisation with respect to inter- and intra-sectoral movement of labour. The present study enquires whether the extent of labour mobility between and within formal–informal sectors affects the formal–informal growth linkages due to the tariff cut on traded goods, as a part of trade liberalisation in India. The findings based on static CGE analysis indicate that in absence of labour market segmentation (i.e. in absence of both wage rigidity and skill specificity) with full mobility of labour, formal sector growth is higher vis-à-vis the growth of those activities under segmented labour market with full mobility of labour. Amongst growing informal sector activities, output growth is lower in absence of segmented labour market with full mobility of labour. Finally, restricted labour mobility leads to largest expansion of formal activities, but further exacerbates the growth of informal activities. The study reveals that improvement in functional income distribution is mixed across households, depending on the degree of labour mobility, which implies labour market adjustment is costly due to structural reforms, that pitches for government intervention.
topic Formal–informal interlinkages
Trade liberalisation
Segmented labour market
Labour mobility
Static CGE model
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40008-020-00217-1
work_keys_str_mv AT anirbankundu impactoftradeliberalisationonformalinformalinterlinkagesinindiadoessectorallabourmobilitymatter
_version_ 1724666396185460736