In-hospital prognosis and long-term mortality of STEMI in a reperfusion network. “Head to head” analisys: invasive reperfusion vs optimal medical therapy

Abstract Background ST Segment Elevation Acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) preferred treatment is culprit artery reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We ought to analyze the benefit of early reperfusion vs. optimal medical therapy in STEMI before and after the set-up...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C . García-García, N. Ribas, L. L. Recasens, O. Meroño, I. Subirana, A. Fernández, A. Pérez, F. Miranda, H. Tizón-Marcos, J. Martí-Almor, J. Bruguera, R. Elosua
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-05-01
Series:BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-017-0574-6
id doaj-08b577adf25a4be4884158f77cc839c6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08b577adf25a4be4884158f77cc839c62020-11-25T03:48:50ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612017-05-011711810.1186/s12872-017-0574-6In-hospital prognosis and long-term mortality of STEMI in a reperfusion network. “Head to head” analisys: invasive reperfusion vs optimal medical therapyC . García-García0N. Ribas1L. L. Recasens2O. Meroño3I. Subirana4A. Fernández5A. Pérez6F. Miranda7H. Tizón-Marcos8J. Martí-Almor9J. Bruguera10R. Elosua11Cardiology Department, Hospital del MarCardiology Department, Hospital del MarCardiology Department, Hospital del MarCardiology Department, Hospital del MarCIBER de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV)Cardiology Department, Hospital del MarCardiology Department, Hospital del MarCardiology Department, Hospital del MarCardiology Department, Hospital del MarCardiology Department, Hospital del MarCardiology Department, Hospital del MarPh Program in Internal Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaAbstract Background ST Segment Elevation Acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) preferred treatment is culprit artery reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We ought to analyze the benefit of early reperfusion vs. optimal medical therapy in STEMI before and after the set-up of a regional STEMI network that prioritizes PPCI. Methods Between January 2002 and December 2013, 1268 STEMI patients were consecutively admitted in a University Hospital. Patients were classified in two groups: pre-STEMI Network (January 2002–June 2009; n = 670) and post-STEMI network (July 2009–December 2013; n = 598). Vital status was available at 2-year follow-up. Results The STEMI network increased reperfusion (89.2% vs 64.4%, p < 0.001) mainly using PCI (99.0% vs 43.9%, p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the post-STEMI network period (2.51% vs. 7.16%, p < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, including age, sex, comorbidities, severity and reperfusion therapy, a trend to a lower in-hospital mortality was observed (post-Network OR: 0.50, 95% CI:0.16–1.59, p = 0.24); this trend disappeared when optimal medical therapy was included in the model (post-Network OR: 1.14, 95% CI:0.32–4.08, p = 0.840). No differences in 2-year mortality were observed (post-Network HR: 0.83; CI 95%: 0.55–1.25, p = 0.37). Conclusion A STEMI network with PPCI 24/7 improved reperfusion therapy, resulting in an increase on PPCI. Despite in-hospital mortality decreased with a STEMI network, 2-year mortality remained similar in both periods, pre- and post-Network. Optimal medical therapy could be as important as reperfusion therapy in a STEMI reperfusion network.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-017-0574-6Reperfusion networkAMI prognosisLong-term mortalityOptimal medical therapyReperfusion therapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C . García-García
N. Ribas
L. L. Recasens
O. Meroño
I. Subirana
A. Fernández
A. Pérez
F. Miranda
H. Tizón-Marcos
J. Martí-Almor
J. Bruguera
R. Elosua
spellingShingle C . García-García
N. Ribas
L. L. Recasens
O. Meroño
I. Subirana
A. Fernández
A. Pérez
F. Miranda
H. Tizón-Marcos
J. Martí-Almor
J. Bruguera
R. Elosua
In-hospital prognosis and long-term mortality of STEMI in a reperfusion network. “Head to head” analisys: invasive reperfusion vs optimal medical therapy
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Reperfusion network
AMI prognosis
Long-term mortality
Optimal medical therapy
Reperfusion therapy
author_facet C . García-García
N. Ribas
L. L. Recasens
O. Meroño
I. Subirana
A. Fernández
A. Pérez
F. Miranda
H. Tizón-Marcos
J. Martí-Almor
J. Bruguera
R. Elosua
author_sort C . García-García
title In-hospital prognosis and long-term mortality of STEMI in a reperfusion network. “Head to head” analisys: invasive reperfusion vs optimal medical therapy
title_short In-hospital prognosis and long-term mortality of STEMI in a reperfusion network. “Head to head” analisys: invasive reperfusion vs optimal medical therapy
title_full In-hospital prognosis and long-term mortality of STEMI in a reperfusion network. “Head to head” analisys: invasive reperfusion vs optimal medical therapy
title_fullStr In-hospital prognosis and long-term mortality of STEMI in a reperfusion network. “Head to head” analisys: invasive reperfusion vs optimal medical therapy
title_full_unstemmed In-hospital prognosis and long-term mortality of STEMI in a reperfusion network. “Head to head” analisys: invasive reperfusion vs optimal medical therapy
title_sort in-hospital prognosis and long-term mortality of stemi in a reperfusion network. “head to head” analisys: invasive reperfusion vs optimal medical therapy
publisher BMC
series BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
issn 1471-2261
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Abstract Background ST Segment Elevation Acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) preferred treatment is culprit artery reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We ought to analyze the benefit of early reperfusion vs. optimal medical therapy in STEMI before and after the set-up of a regional STEMI network that prioritizes PPCI. Methods Between January 2002 and December 2013, 1268 STEMI patients were consecutively admitted in a University Hospital. Patients were classified in two groups: pre-STEMI Network (January 2002–June 2009; n = 670) and post-STEMI network (July 2009–December 2013; n = 598). Vital status was available at 2-year follow-up. Results The STEMI network increased reperfusion (89.2% vs 64.4%, p < 0.001) mainly using PCI (99.0% vs 43.9%, p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the post-STEMI network period (2.51% vs. 7.16%, p < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, including age, sex, comorbidities, severity and reperfusion therapy, a trend to a lower in-hospital mortality was observed (post-Network OR: 0.50, 95% CI:0.16–1.59, p = 0.24); this trend disappeared when optimal medical therapy was included in the model (post-Network OR: 1.14, 95% CI:0.32–4.08, p = 0.840). No differences in 2-year mortality were observed (post-Network HR: 0.83; CI 95%: 0.55–1.25, p = 0.37). Conclusion A STEMI network with PPCI 24/7 improved reperfusion therapy, resulting in an increase on PPCI. Despite in-hospital mortality decreased with a STEMI network, 2-year mortality remained similar in both periods, pre- and post-Network. Optimal medical therapy could be as important as reperfusion therapy in a STEMI reperfusion network.
topic Reperfusion network
AMI prognosis
Long-term mortality
Optimal medical therapy
Reperfusion therapy
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-017-0574-6
work_keys_str_mv AT cgarciagarcia inhospitalprognosisandlongtermmortalityofstemiinareperfusionnetworkheadtoheadanalisysinvasivereperfusionvsoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT nribas inhospitalprognosisandlongtermmortalityofstemiinareperfusionnetworkheadtoheadanalisysinvasivereperfusionvsoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT llrecasens inhospitalprognosisandlongtermmortalityofstemiinareperfusionnetworkheadtoheadanalisysinvasivereperfusionvsoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT omerono inhospitalprognosisandlongtermmortalityofstemiinareperfusionnetworkheadtoheadanalisysinvasivereperfusionvsoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT isubirana inhospitalprognosisandlongtermmortalityofstemiinareperfusionnetworkheadtoheadanalisysinvasivereperfusionvsoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT afernandez inhospitalprognosisandlongtermmortalityofstemiinareperfusionnetworkheadtoheadanalisysinvasivereperfusionvsoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT aperez inhospitalprognosisandlongtermmortalityofstemiinareperfusionnetworkheadtoheadanalisysinvasivereperfusionvsoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT fmiranda inhospitalprognosisandlongtermmortalityofstemiinareperfusionnetworkheadtoheadanalisysinvasivereperfusionvsoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT htizonmarcos inhospitalprognosisandlongtermmortalityofstemiinareperfusionnetworkheadtoheadanalisysinvasivereperfusionvsoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT jmartialmor inhospitalprognosisandlongtermmortalityofstemiinareperfusionnetworkheadtoheadanalisysinvasivereperfusionvsoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT jbruguera inhospitalprognosisandlongtermmortalityofstemiinareperfusionnetworkheadtoheadanalisysinvasivereperfusionvsoptimalmedicaltherapy
AT relosua inhospitalprognosisandlongtermmortalityofstemiinareperfusionnetworkheadtoheadanalisysinvasivereperfusionvsoptimalmedicaltherapy
_version_ 1724496926244601856