Denying Assisted Dying Where Death is Not ‘Reasonably Foreseeable’: Intolerable Overgeneralization in Canadian End-of-Life Law

The recent change in Canadian law to allow access to medical assistance in dying restricts eligibility, among its other criteria, to those for whom “natural death has become reasonably foreseeable.” A recent review of certain aspects of the law examined the evidence pertaining to extending access t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kevin Reel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal 2018-12-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Bioethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb/article/view/69
id doaj-092756bd9a234abaac9e44a570619de4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-092756bd9a234abaac9e44a570619de42021-02-02T07:56:27ZengProgrammes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de MontréalCanadian Journal of Bioethics2561-46652018-12-0113Denying Assisted Dying Where Death is Not ‘Reasonably Foreseeable’: Intolerable Overgeneralization in Canadian End-of-Life LawKevin Reel0Joint Centre for Bioethics and Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Canada The recent change in Canadian law to allow access to medical assistance in dying restricts eligibility, among its other criteria, to those for whom “natural death has become reasonably foreseeable.” A recent review of certain aspects of the law examined the evidence pertaining to extending access to assisted dying in three particular request situations currently denied: requests by mature minors, advance requests, and requests where mental illness is the sole underlying medical condition [1]. The requirement for this review was included in the legislation that introduced medical assistance in dying in Canada. Both the original change in the law and the review itself neglected to consider those with intolerable suffering for whom natural death is not reasonably foreseeable. This paper explores the possibility that access to assisted dying should be extended by removing this limiting criterion. It also considers the ethical challenges this might present for those who work in rehabilitation. https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb/article/view/69assisted dyingdisabilityeuthanasiamedical assistance in dyingsuicide
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin Reel
spellingShingle Kevin Reel
Denying Assisted Dying Where Death is Not ‘Reasonably Foreseeable’: Intolerable Overgeneralization in Canadian End-of-Life Law
Canadian Journal of Bioethics
assisted dying
disability
euthanasia
medical assistance in dying
suicide
author_facet Kevin Reel
author_sort Kevin Reel
title Denying Assisted Dying Where Death is Not ‘Reasonably Foreseeable’: Intolerable Overgeneralization in Canadian End-of-Life Law
title_short Denying Assisted Dying Where Death is Not ‘Reasonably Foreseeable’: Intolerable Overgeneralization in Canadian End-of-Life Law
title_full Denying Assisted Dying Where Death is Not ‘Reasonably Foreseeable’: Intolerable Overgeneralization in Canadian End-of-Life Law
title_fullStr Denying Assisted Dying Where Death is Not ‘Reasonably Foreseeable’: Intolerable Overgeneralization in Canadian End-of-Life Law
title_full_unstemmed Denying Assisted Dying Where Death is Not ‘Reasonably Foreseeable’: Intolerable Overgeneralization in Canadian End-of-Life Law
title_sort denying assisted dying where death is not ‘reasonably foreseeable’: intolerable overgeneralization in canadian end-of-life law
publisher Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal
series Canadian Journal of Bioethics
issn 2561-4665
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The recent change in Canadian law to allow access to medical assistance in dying restricts eligibility, among its other criteria, to those for whom “natural death has become reasonably foreseeable.” A recent review of certain aspects of the law examined the evidence pertaining to extending access to assisted dying in three particular request situations currently denied: requests by mature minors, advance requests, and requests where mental illness is the sole underlying medical condition [1]. The requirement for this review was included in the legislation that introduced medical assistance in dying in Canada. Both the original change in the law and the review itself neglected to consider those with intolerable suffering for whom natural death is not reasonably foreseeable. This paper explores the possibility that access to assisted dying should be extended by removing this limiting criterion. It also considers the ethical challenges this might present for those who work in rehabilitation.
topic assisted dying
disability
euthanasia
medical assistance in dying
suicide
url https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb/article/view/69
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinreel denyingassisteddyingwheredeathisnotreasonablyforeseeableintolerableovergeneralizationincanadianendoflifelaw
_version_ 1724298240856162304