Avoidance or Coexistence? The Spatiotemporal Patterns of Wild Mammals in a Human-dominated Landscape in the Western Himalaya

Human–wildlife interfaces are increasing rapidly due to the disproportionate growth of human and wildlife populations in a spatial context. The Himalayan system, a global biodiversity hotspot, is subject to landscape modification from various anthropogenic activities. In this study, we offer insight...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nimisha Srivastava, Ramesh Krishnamurthy, Sambandam Sathyakumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Mountain Society 2020-05-01
Series:Mountain Research and Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bioone.org/doi/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-19-00046.1
id doaj-092e7ca6a3cb45eb9299429371e64f60
record_format Article
spelling doaj-092e7ca6a3cb45eb9299429371e64f602021-01-19T10:08:34ZengInternational Mountain SocietyMountain Research and Development0276-47411994-71512020-05-01402R20R31https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-19-00046.1Avoidance or Coexistence? The Spatiotemporal Patterns of Wild Mammals in a Human-dominated Landscape in the Western HimalayaNimisha Srivastava0Ramesh Krishnamurthy1Sambandam Sathyakumar2Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Post Box 18, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India; nimisha.mammals@gmail.com Department of Landscape Level Planning and Management, Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Post Box 18, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India; Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, CanadaDepartment of Endangered Species Management, Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Post Box 18, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, IndiaHuman–wildlife interfaces are increasing rapidly due to the disproportionate growth of human and wildlife populations in a spatial context. The Himalayan system, a global biodiversity hotspot, is subject to landscape modification from various anthropogenic activities. In this study, we offer insights into the human–wildlife interface, reflecting avoidance or coexistence, with implications for local and landscape management strategies. We investigated fine-scale space use and temporal activity patterns of mammalian wildlife in a human-dominated landscape, outside a protected area. The research methods involved robust digital camera trap sampling (n = 131) across the target area (116 km2) with a total human population of 153,585. We developed a new sampling strategy that accounted for spatial heterogeneity in the habitats and variations in mammalian community composition. Our results showed that, in spite of high usage and the presence of humans across the study area, 16 wild mammal species used the area with varying intensities, exploiting habitat and forage availability. Of the camera traps placed in the study area, 70.23% had overlapping captures for humans on foot and wild mammal species. Generalist species used natural, modified, and altered habitats, while herbivores remained in natural and modified areas. However, some mammals that used modified/altered areas avoided humans by modifying their temporal activity. In the context of management of large landscapes, including areas outside the protected area network, the results of this study highlight the significant plasticity exhibited by wild mammals in negotiating natural and human-modified habitats. This offers an opportunity to develop conservation management strategies focusing on these fine-scale patterns and human actions.https://bioone.org/doi/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-19-00046.1activity patternagricultural landscapesanimal behaviorhimalayahuman–wildlife interfacelandscape management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nimisha Srivastava
Ramesh Krishnamurthy
Sambandam Sathyakumar
spellingShingle Nimisha Srivastava
Ramesh Krishnamurthy
Sambandam Sathyakumar
Avoidance or Coexistence? The Spatiotemporal Patterns of Wild Mammals in a Human-dominated Landscape in the Western Himalaya
Mountain Research and Development
activity pattern
agricultural landscapes
animal behavior
himalaya
human–wildlife interface
landscape management
author_facet Nimisha Srivastava
Ramesh Krishnamurthy
Sambandam Sathyakumar
author_sort Nimisha Srivastava
title Avoidance or Coexistence? The Spatiotemporal Patterns of Wild Mammals in a Human-dominated Landscape in the Western Himalaya
title_short Avoidance or Coexistence? The Spatiotemporal Patterns of Wild Mammals in a Human-dominated Landscape in the Western Himalaya
title_full Avoidance or Coexistence? The Spatiotemporal Patterns of Wild Mammals in a Human-dominated Landscape in the Western Himalaya
title_fullStr Avoidance or Coexistence? The Spatiotemporal Patterns of Wild Mammals in a Human-dominated Landscape in the Western Himalaya
title_full_unstemmed Avoidance or Coexistence? The Spatiotemporal Patterns of Wild Mammals in a Human-dominated Landscape in the Western Himalaya
title_sort avoidance or coexistence? the spatiotemporal patterns of wild mammals in a human-dominated landscape in the western himalaya
publisher International Mountain Society
series Mountain Research and Development
issn 0276-4741
1994-7151
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Human–wildlife interfaces are increasing rapidly due to the disproportionate growth of human and wildlife populations in a spatial context. The Himalayan system, a global biodiversity hotspot, is subject to landscape modification from various anthropogenic activities. In this study, we offer insights into the human–wildlife interface, reflecting avoidance or coexistence, with implications for local and landscape management strategies. We investigated fine-scale space use and temporal activity patterns of mammalian wildlife in a human-dominated landscape, outside a protected area. The research methods involved robust digital camera trap sampling (n = 131) across the target area (116 km2) with a total human population of 153,585. We developed a new sampling strategy that accounted for spatial heterogeneity in the habitats and variations in mammalian community composition. Our results showed that, in spite of high usage and the presence of humans across the study area, 16 wild mammal species used the area with varying intensities, exploiting habitat and forage availability. Of the camera traps placed in the study area, 70.23% had overlapping captures for humans on foot and wild mammal species. Generalist species used natural, modified, and altered habitats, while herbivores remained in natural and modified areas. However, some mammals that used modified/altered areas avoided humans by modifying their temporal activity. In the context of management of large landscapes, including areas outside the protected area network, the results of this study highlight the significant plasticity exhibited by wild mammals in negotiating natural and human-modified habitats. This offers an opportunity to develop conservation management strategies focusing on these fine-scale patterns and human actions.
topic activity pattern
agricultural landscapes
animal behavior
himalaya
human–wildlife interface
landscape management
url https://bioone.org/doi/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-19-00046.1
work_keys_str_mv AT nimishasrivastava avoidanceorcoexistencethespatiotemporalpatternsofwildmammalsinahumandominatedlandscapeinthewesternhimalaya
AT rameshkrishnamurthy avoidanceorcoexistencethespatiotemporalpatternsofwildmammalsinahumandominatedlandscapeinthewesternhimalaya
AT sambandamsathyakumar avoidanceorcoexistencethespatiotemporalpatternsofwildmammalsinahumandominatedlandscapeinthewesternhimalaya
_version_ 1724331896532369408