Efficacy and safety of degarelix in Korean patients with prostate cancer requiring androgen deprivation therapy: Open-label multicenter phase III study

Purpose: To assess the noninferiority, efficacy, and safety of degarelix in achieving and maintaining testosterone at castrate levels (≤0.5 ng/mL) in Korean patients (CS42) versus non-Asian patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: A Phase III, open-label, multicenter, single-arm trial was condu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dalsan You, Byung Ha Chung, Sang Eun Lee, Choung-Soo Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015-03-01
Series:Prostate International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888215000069
id doaj-098261caa95e4dbb962c3f4a72976300
record_format Article
spelling doaj-098261caa95e4dbb962c3f4a729763002020-11-24T22:43:46ZengElsevierProstate International2287-88822015-03-0131222610.1016/j.prnil.2015.02.005Efficacy and safety of degarelix in Korean patients with prostate cancer requiring androgen deprivation therapy: Open-label multicenter phase III studyDalsan You0Byung Ha Chung1Sang Eun Lee2Choung-Soo Kim3Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDepartment of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South KoreaDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaPurpose: To assess the noninferiority, efficacy, and safety of degarelix in achieving and maintaining testosterone at castrate levels (≤0.5 ng/mL) in Korean patients (CS42) versus non-Asian patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: A Phase III, open-label, multicenter, single-arm trial was conducted in Korean patients with PCa. Degarelix was administered at a starting dose of 240 mg followed by monthly (28-day intervals) maintenance doses of 80 mg (240/80 mg dose regimen) for 7 months. The results were compared with non-Asian patients receiving degarelix 240/80 mg in the CS21 study. Results: The estimated difference in the cumulative probabilities of testosterone ≤0.5 ng/mL from Day 28 to Day 196 between the trials was −2.3% (96.7% in CS42 vs. 99.0% in CS21). The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was −5.5%, i.e., above the predefined noninferiority limit of −10% and thus noninferiority was established. Decreases in serum testosterone, prostate-specific antigen, and luteinizing hormone over time were similar in CS42 and CS21. There were no clinically significant differences in incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (72% in CS42 vs. 70% in CS21) and changes in clinical chemistry and hematology parameters between the two trials. The most common adverse event was injection-site reaction. Conclusions: Overall, degarelix was effective and well tolerated in Korean patients. Testosterone suppression was noninferior to that in non-Asian patients and safety findings were as would be expected for elderly men with PCa undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888215000069Androgen deprivation therapyDegarelixKoreanProstate cancerTestosterone
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dalsan You
Byung Ha Chung
Sang Eun Lee
Choung-Soo Kim
spellingShingle Dalsan You
Byung Ha Chung
Sang Eun Lee
Choung-Soo Kim
Efficacy and safety of degarelix in Korean patients with prostate cancer requiring androgen deprivation therapy: Open-label multicenter phase III study
Prostate International
Androgen deprivation therapy
Degarelix
Korean
Prostate cancer
Testosterone
author_facet Dalsan You
Byung Ha Chung
Sang Eun Lee
Choung-Soo Kim
author_sort Dalsan You
title Efficacy and safety of degarelix in Korean patients with prostate cancer requiring androgen deprivation therapy: Open-label multicenter phase III study
title_short Efficacy and safety of degarelix in Korean patients with prostate cancer requiring androgen deprivation therapy: Open-label multicenter phase III study
title_full Efficacy and safety of degarelix in Korean patients with prostate cancer requiring androgen deprivation therapy: Open-label multicenter phase III study
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of degarelix in Korean patients with prostate cancer requiring androgen deprivation therapy: Open-label multicenter phase III study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of degarelix in Korean patients with prostate cancer requiring androgen deprivation therapy: Open-label multicenter phase III study
title_sort efficacy and safety of degarelix in korean patients with prostate cancer requiring androgen deprivation therapy: open-label multicenter phase iii study
publisher Elsevier
series Prostate International
issn 2287-8882
publishDate 2015-03-01
description Purpose: To assess the noninferiority, efficacy, and safety of degarelix in achieving and maintaining testosterone at castrate levels (≤0.5 ng/mL) in Korean patients (CS42) versus non-Asian patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: A Phase III, open-label, multicenter, single-arm trial was conducted in Korean patients with PCa. Degarelix was administered at a starting dose of 240 mg followed by monthly (28-day intervals) maintenance doses of 80 mg (240/80 mg dose regimen) for 7 months. The results were compared with non-Asian patients receiving degarelix 240/80 mg in the CS21 study. Results: The estimated difference in the cumulative probabilities of testosterone ≤0.5 ng/mL from Day 28 to Day 196 between the trials was −2.3% (96.7% in CS42 vs. 99.0% in CS21). The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was −5.5%, i.e., above the predefined noninferiority limit of −10% and thus noninferiority was established. Decreases in serum testosterone, prostate-specific antigen, and luteinizing hormone over time were similar in CS42 and CS21. There were no clinically significant differences in incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (72% in CS42 vs. 70% in CS21) and changes in clinical chemistry and hematology parameters between the two trials. The most common adverse event was injection-site reaction. Conclusions: Overall, degarelix was effective and well tolerated in Korean patients. Testosterone suppression was noninferior to that in non-Asian patients and safety findings were as would be expected for elderly men with PCa undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.
topic Androgen deprivation therapy
Degarelix
Korean
Prostate cancer
Testosterone
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888215000069
work_keys_str_mv AT dalsanyou efficacyandsafetyofdegarelixinkoreanpatientswithprostatecancerrequiringandrogendeprivationtherapyopenlabelmulticenterphaseiiistudy
AT byunghachung efficacyandsafetyofdegarelixinkoreanpatientswithprostatecancerrequiringandrogendeprivationtherapyopenlabelmulticenterphaseiiistudy
AT sangeunlee efficacyandsafetyofdegarelixinkoreanpatientswithprostatecancerrequiringandrogendeprivationtherapyopenlabelmulticenterphaseiiistudy
AT choungsookim efficacyandsafetyofdegarelixinkoreanpatientswithprostatecancerrequiringandrogendeprivationtherapyopenlabelmulticenterphaseiiistudy
_version_ 1725694579225657344