Rethinking on Cultural Sustainability in Architecture: Projects of Behruz Çinici

This study aims to open a discussion on the concept of cultural sustainability in architectural design. We asked the question of whether spatial planning has a role in cultural sustainability and in which terms cultural sustainability could be considered or discussed in the design process. We starte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: İkbal Ece Postalcı, Güldehan Fatma Atay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-02-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1069
id doaj-09b0d7d033e54f53b4eeba65a6c0823f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-09b0d7d033e54f53b4eeba65a6c0823f2020-11-24T23:30:43ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-02-01114106910.3390/su11041069su11041069Rethinking on Cultural Sustainability in Architecture: Projects of Behruz Çiniciİkbal Ece PostalcıGüldehan Fatma Atay0Department of Architecture, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Faculty of Architecture, Fındıklı 34427, Istanbul, TurkeyThis study aims to open a discussion on the concept of cultural sustainability in architectural design. We asked the question of whether spatial planning has a role in cultural sustainability and in which terms cultural sustainability could be considered or discussed in the design process. We started with a presupposition of an example that achieved cultural sustainability in time. We exemplified a holiday resort village designed in 1970, which is still in use with inconsiderable transformations. Social engineering was a necessity for the architects, Altuğ and Behruz Çinici, and their design approach was to achieve sustainable living considering financial, ecological, environmental, and cultural dimensions. Behruz Çinici and his wife, Altuğ Çinici, were influential architects of their time. For an understanding of Çinici’s design concepts, we first looked at the inspiration sources mentioned in his conferences. After studying their village projects, we suggested four spatial concepts for reading projects from the perspective of cultural sustainability. We analyzed their three resort villages, which were designed in the same decade, through the criteria we have suggested. In the evaluation, the distinguished features of Çinici’s resort projects are discussed in relation to the concept of cultural sustainability. In conclusion, we aim to open a discussion for the criteria we proposed for cultural sustainability in spatial planning, and to emphasize the importance of cultural practices for housing policies for regional identity in a global world.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1069cultural sustainabilityhousingspatial planningresort villageBehruz Çinici
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author İkbal Ece Postalcı
Güldehan Fatma Atay
spellingShingle İkbal Ece Postalcı
Güldehan Fatma Atay
Rethinking on Cultural Sustainability in Architecture: Projects of Behruz Çinici
Sustainability
cultural sustainability
housing
spatial planning
resort village
Behruz Çinici
author_facet İkbal Ece Postalcı
Güldehan Fatma Atay
author_sort İkbal Ece Postalcı
title Rethinking on Cultural Sustainability in Architecture: Projects of Behruz Çinici
title_short Rethinking on Cultural Sustainability in Architecture: Projects of Behruz Çinici
title_full Rethinking on Cultural Sustainability in Architecture: Projects of Behruz Çinici
title_fullStr Rethinking on Cultural Sustainability in Architecture: Projects of Behruz Çinici
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking on Cultural Sustainability in Architecture: Projects of Behruz Çinici
title_sort rethinking on cultural sustainability in architecture: projects of behruz çinici
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-02-01
description This study aims to open a discussion on the concept of cultural sustainability in architectural design. We asked the question of whether spatial planning has a role in cultural sustainability and in which terms cultural sustainability could be considered or discussed in the design process. We started with a presupposition of an example that achieved cultural sustainability in time. We exemplified a holiday resort village designed in 1970, which is still in use with inconsiderable transformations. Social engineering was a necessity for the architects, Altuğ and Behruz Çinici, and their design approach was to achieve sustainable living considering financial, ecological, environmental, and cultural dimensions. Behruz Çinici and his wife, Altuğ Çinici, were influential architects of their time. For an understanding of Çinici’s design concepts, we first looked at the inspiration sources mentioned in his conferences. After studying their village projects, we suggested four spatial concepts for reading projects from the perspective of cultural sustainability. We analyzed their three resort villages, which were designed in the same decade, through the criteria we have suggested. In the evaluation, the distinguished features of Çinici’s resort projects are discussed in relation to the concept of cultural sustainability. In conclusion, we aim to open a discussion for the criteria we proposed for cultural sustainability in spatial planning, and to emphasize the importance of cultural practices for housing policies for regional identity in a global world.
topic cultural sustainability
housing
spatial planning
resort village
Behruz Çinici
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1069
work_keys_str_mv AT ikbalecepostalcı rethinkingonculturalsustainabilityinarchitectureprojectsofbehruzcinici
AT guldehanfatmaatay rethinkingonculturalsustainabilityinarchitectureprojectsofbehruzcinici
_version_ 1725540708954144768