Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>As most genital chlamydia infections are asymptomatic, screening is the main way to detect and cases for treatment. We undertook a systematic review of studies assessing the efficacy of interventions for increasing the uptake of chla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Donovan Basil, Ward James, Poznanski Simone, Liu Bette, Ali Hammad, Guy Rebecca J, Kaldor John, Hocking Jane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-08-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/211
id doaj-0a4538b29dfe4b9c9d6788b2910942b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0a4538b29dfe4b9c9d6788b2910942b32020-11-25T03:57:33ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342011-08-0111121110.1186/1471-2334-11-211Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic reviewDonovan BasilWard JamesPoznanski SimoneLiu BetteAli HammadGuy Rebecca JKaldor JohnHocking Jane<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>As most genital chlamydia infections are asymptomatic, screening is the main way to detect and cases for treatment. We undertook a systematic review of studies assessing the efficacy of interventions for increasing the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We reviewed studies which compared chlamydia screening in the presence and the absence of an intervention. The primary endpoints were screening rate or total tests.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We identified 16 intervention strategies; 11 were randomised controlled trials and five observational studies, 10 targeted females only, five both males and females, and one males only. Of the 15 interventions among females, six were associated with significant increases in screening rates at the 0.05 level including a multifaceted quality improvement program that involved provision of a urine jar to patients at registration (44% in intervention clinics vs. 16% in the control clinic); linking screening to routine Pap smears (6.9% vs. 4.5%), computer alerts for doctors (12.2% vs. 10.6%); education workshops for clinic staff; internet-based continuing medical education (15.5% vs. 12.4%); and free sexual health consultations (16.8% vs. 13.2%). Of the six interventions targeting males, two found significant increases including the multifaceted quality improvement program in which urine jars were provided to patients at registration (45% vs. 15%); and the offering by doctors of a test to all presenting young male clients, prior to consultation (29 vs. 4%).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Interventions that promoted the universal offer of a chlamydia test in young people had the greatest impact on increasing screening in primary care.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/211
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Donovan Basil
Ward James
Poznanski Simone
Liu Bette
Ali Hammad
Guy Rebecca J
Kaldor John
Hocking Jane
spellingShingle Donovan Basil
Ward James
Poznanski Simone
Liu Bette
Ali Hammad
Guy Rebecca J
Kaldor John
Hocking Jane
Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review
BMC Infectious Diseases
author_facet Donovan Basil
Ward James
Poznanski Simone
Liu Bette
Ali Hammad
Guy Rebecca J
Kaldor John
Hocking Jane
author_sort Donovan Basil
title Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review
title_short Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review
title_full Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review
title_fullStr Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review
title_sort efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review
publisher BMC
series BMC Infectious Diseases
issn 1471-2334
publishDate 2011-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>As most genital chlamydia infections are asymptomatic, screening is the main way to detect and cases for treatment. We undertook a systematic review of studies assessing the efficacy of interventions for increasing the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We reviewed studies which compared chlamydia screening in the presence and the absence of an intervention. The primary endpoints were screening rate or total tests.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We identified 16 intervention strategies; 11 were randomised controlled trials and five observational studies, 10 targeted females only, five both males and females, and one males only. Of the 15 interventions among females, six were associated with significant increases in screening rates at the 0.05 level including a multifaceted quality improvement program that involved provision of a urine jar to patients at registration (44% in intervention clinics vs. 16% in the control clinic); linking screening to routine Pap smears (6.9% vs. 4.5%), computer alerts for doctors (12.2% vs. 10.6%); education workshops for clinic staff; internet-based continuing medical education (15.5% vs. 12.4%); and free sexual health consultations (16.8% vs. 13.2%). Of the six interventions targeting males, two found significant increases including the multifaceted quality improvement program in which urine jars were provided to patients at registration (45% vs. 15%); and the offering by doctors of a test to all presenting young male clients, prior to consultation (29 vs. 4%).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Interventions that promoted the universal offer of a chlamydia test in young people had the greatest impact on increasing screening in primary care.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/211
work_keys_str_mv AT donovanbasil efficacyofinterventionstoincreasetheuptakeofchlamydiascreeninginprimarycareasystematicreview
AT wardjames efficacyofinterventionstoincreasetheuptakeofchlamydiascreeninginprimarycareasystematicreview
AT poznanskisimone efficacyofinterventionstoincreasetheuptakeofchlamydiascreeninginprimarycareasystematicreview
AT liubette efficacyofinterventionstoincreasetheuptakeofchlamydiascreeninginprimarycareasystematicreview
AT alihammad efficacyofinterventionstoincreasetheuptakeofchlamydiascreeninginprimarycareasystematicreview
AT guyrebeccaj efficacyofinterventionstoincreasetheuptakeofchlamydiascreeninginprimarycareasystematicreview
AT kaldorjohn efficacyofinterventionstoincreasetheuptakeofchlamydiascreeninginprimarycareasystematicreview
AT hockingjane efficacyofinterventionstoincreasetheuptakeofchlamydiascreeninginprimarycareasystematicreview
_version_ 1724460120060985344