A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol

Protocol adherence in behavioral intervention clinical trials is critical to trial success. There is increasing interest in understanding which patients are more likely to adhere to trial protocols. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the use of a data-driven approach to explore patient c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maren K. Olsen, Karen M. Stechuchak, Anna Hung, Eugene Z. Oddone, Laura J. Damschroder, David Edelman, Matthew L. Maciejewski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-09-01
Series:Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865420301150
id doaj-0a531f68875943fc914421daa8c6aed3
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maren K. Olsen
Karen M. Stechuchak
Anna Hung
Eugene Z. Oddone
Laura J. Damschroder
David Edelman
Matthew L. Maciejewski
spellingShingle Maren K. Olsen
Karen M. Stechuchak
Anna Hung
Eugene Z. Oddone
Laura J. Damschroder
David Edelman
Matthew L. Maciejewski
A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Veterans
Protocol adherence
Subgroup
Model-based recursive partitioning
author_facet Maren K. Olsen
Karen M. Stechuchak
Anna Hung
Eugene Z. Oddone
Laura J. Damschroder
David Edelman
Matthew L. Maciejewski
author_sort Maren K. Olsen
title A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol
title_short A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol
title_full A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol
title_fullStr A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol
title_sort data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol
publisher Elsevier
series Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
issn 2451-8654
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Protocol adherence in behavioral intervention clinical trials is critical to trial success. There is increasing interest in understanding which patients are more likely to adhere to trial protocols. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the use of a data-driven approach to explore patient characteristics associated with the lowest and highest rates of adherence in three trials assessing interventions targeting behaviors related to lifestyle and risk for cardiovascular disease. Each trial included a common set of baseline variables. Model-based recursive partitioning (MoB) was applied in each trial to identify participant characteristics of subgroups characterized by these baseline variables with differences in protocol adherence. Bootstrap resampling was conducted to provide optimism-corrected c-statistics of the final solutions. In the three trials, rates of protocol adherence varied from 56.9% to 87.5%. Evaluation of heterogeneity of protocol adherence via MoB in each trial resulted in trees with 2–4 subgroups based on splits of 1–3 variables. In two of the three trials, the first split was based on pain in the past week, and those reporting lower pain were less likely to be adherent. In one of these trials, the second and third splits were based on education and employment, where those with lower education levels and who were employed were less likely to be adherent. In the third trial, the two splits were based on smoking status and then marriage status, where smokers who were married were least likely to be adherent. Optimism-corrected c-statistics ranged from 0.54 to 0.63. Model-based recursive partitioning can be a useful approach to explore heterogeneity in protocol adherence in behavioral intervention trials. An important next step would be to assess whether patterns hold in other similar studies and samples. Identifying subgroups who are less likely to be adherent to an intervention can help inform modifications to the intervention to help tailor the intervention to these subgroups and increase future uptake and impact. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01828567, NCT02360293, and NCT01838226.
topic Veterans
Protocol adherence
Subgroup
Model-based recursive partitioning
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865420301150
work_keys_str_mv AT marenkolsen adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT karenmstechuchak adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT annahung adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT eugenezoddone adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT laurajdamschroder adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT davidedelman adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT matthewlmaciejewski adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT marenkolsen datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT karenmstechuchak datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT annahung datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT eugenezoddone datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT laurajdamschroder datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT davidedelman datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
AT matthewlmaciejewski datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol
_version_ 1724420698871431168
spelling doaj-0a531f68875943fc914421daa8c6aed32020-11-25T04:10:06ZengElsevierContemporary Clinical Trials Communications2451-86542020-09-0119100631A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocolMaren K. Olsen0Karen M. Stechuchak1Anna Hung2Eugene Z. Oddone3Laura J. Damschroder4David Edelman5Matthew L. Maciejewski6Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Corresponding author. Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USADurham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; DCRI, Duke University, Durham, NC, USADurham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USAAnn Arbor VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; VA PROVE QUERI, Ann Arbor, MI, USADurham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USADurham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USAProtocol adherence in behavioral intervention clinical trials is critical to trial success. There is increasing interest in understanding which patients are more likely to adhere to trial protocols. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the use of a data-driven approach to explore patient characteristics associated with the lowest and highest rates of adherence in three trials assessing interventions targeting behaviors related to lifestyle and risk for cardiovascular disease. Each trial included a common set of baseline variables. Model-based recursive partitioning (MoB) was applied in each trial to identify participant characteristics of subgroups characterized by these baseline variables with differences in protocol adherence. Bootstrap resampling was conducted to provide optimism-corrected c-statistics of the final solutions. In the three trials, rates of protocol adherence varied from 56.9% to 87.5%. Evaluation of heterogeneity of protocol adherence via MoB in each trial resulted in trees with 2–4 subgroups based on splits of 1–3 variables. In two of the three trials, the first split was based on pain in the past week, and those reporting lower pain were less likely to be adherent. In one of these trials, the second and third splits were based on education and employment, where those with lower education levels and who were employed were less likely to be adherent. In the third trial, the two splits were based on smoking status and then marriage status, where smokers who were married were least likely to be adherent. Optimism-corrected c-statistics ranged from 0.54 to 0.63. Model-based recursive partitioning can be a useful approach to explore heterogeneity in protocol adherence in behavioral intervention trials. An important next step would be to assess whether patterns hold in other similar studies and samples. Identifying subgroups who are less likely to be adherent to an intervention can help inform modifications to the intervention to help tailor the intervention to these subgroups and increase future uptake and impact. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01828567, NCT02360293, and NCT01838226.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865420301150VeteransProtocol adherenceSubgroupModel-based recursive partitioning