A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol
Protocol adherence in behavioral intervention clinical trials is critical to trial success. There is increasing interest in understanding which patients are more likely to adhere to trial protocols. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the use of a data-driven approach to explore patient c...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865420301150 |
id |
doaj-0a531f68875943fc914421daa8c6aed3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maren K. Olsen Karen M. Stechuchak Anna Hung Eugene Z. Oddone Laura J. Damschroder David Edelman Matthew L. Maciejewski |
spellingShingle |
Maren K. Olsen Karen M. Stechuchak Anna Hung Eugene Z. Oddone Laura J. Damschroder David Edelman Matthew L. Maciejewski A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Veterans Protocol adherence Subgroup Model-based recursive partitioning |
author_facet |
Maren K. Olsen Karen M. Stechuchak Anna Hung Eugene Z. Oddone Laura J. Damschroder David Edelman Matthew L. Maciejewski |
author_sort |
Maren K. Olsen |
title |
A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol |
title_short |
A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol |
title_full |
A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol |
title_fullStr |
A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol |
title_full_unstemmed |
A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol |
title_sort |
data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications |
issn |
2451-8654 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
Protocol adherence in behavioral intervention clinical trials is critical to trial success. There is increasing interest in understanding which patients are more likely to adhere to trial protocols. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the use of a data-driven approach to explore patient characteristics associated with the lowest and highest rates of adherence in three trials assessing interventions targeting behaviors related to lifestyle and risk for cardiovascular disease. Each trial included a common set of baseline variables. Model-based recursive partitioning (MoB) was applied in each trial to identify participant characteristics of subgroups characterized by these baseline variables with differences in protocol adherence. Bootstrap resampling was conducted to provide optimism-corrected c-statistics of the final solutions. In the three trials, rates of protocol adherence varied from 56.9% to 87.5%. Evaluation of heterogeneity of protocol adherence via MoB in each trial resulted in trees with 2–4 subgroups based on splits of 1–3 variables. In two of the three trials, the first split was based on pain in the past week, and those reporting lower pain were less likely to be adherent. In one of these trials, the second and third splits were based on education and employment, where those with lower education levels and who were employed were less likely to be adherent. In the third trial, the two splits were based on smoking status and then marriage status, where smokers who were married were least likely to be adherent. Optimism-corrected c-statistics ranged from 0.54 to 0.63. Model-based recursive partitioning can be a useful approach to explore heterogeneity in protocol adherence in behavioral intervention trials. An important next step would be to assess whether patterns hold in other similar studies and samples. Identifying subgroups who are less likely to be adherent to an intervention can help inform modifications to the intervention to help tailor the intervention to these subgroups and increase future uptake and impact. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01828567, NCT02360293, and NCT01838226. |
topic |
Veterans Protocol adherence Subgroup Model-based recursive partitioning |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865420301150 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marenkolsen adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT karenmstechuchak adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT annahung adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT eugenezoddone adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT laurajdamschroder adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT davidedelman adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT matthewlmaciejewski adatadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT marenkolsen datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT karenmstechuchak datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT annahung datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT eugenezoddone datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT laurajdamschroder datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT davidedelman datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol AT matthewlmaciejewski datadrivenexaminationofwhichpatientsfollowtrialprotocol |
_version_ |
1724420698871431168 |
spelling |
doaj-0a531f68875943fc914421daa8c6aed32020-11-25T04:10:06ZengElsevierContemporary Clinical Trials Communications2451-86542020-09-0119100631A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocolMaren K. Olsen0Karen M. Stechuchak1Anna Hung2Eugene Z. Oddone3Laura J. Damschroder4David Edelman5Matthew L. Maciejewski6Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Corresponding author. Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USADurham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; DCRI, Duke University, Durham, NC, USADurham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USAAnn Arbor VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; VA PROVE QUERI, Ann Arbor, MI, USADurham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USADurham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USAProtocol adherence in behavioral intervention clinical trials is critical to trial success. There is increasing interest in understanding which patients are more likely to adhere to trial protocols. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the use of a data-driven approach to explore patient characteristics associated with the lowest and highest rates of adherence in three trials assessing interventions targeting behaviors related to lifestyle and risk for cardiovascular disease. Each trial included a common set of baseline variables. Model-based recursive partitioning (MoB) was applied in each trial to identify participant characteristics of subgroups characterized by these baseline variables with differences in protocol adherence. Bootstrap resampling was conducted to provide optimism-corrected c-statistics of the final solutions. In the three trials, rates of protocol adherence varied from 56.9% to 87.5%. Evaluation of heterogeneity of protocol adherence via MoB in each trial resulted in trees with 2–4 subgroups based on splits of 1–3 variables. In two of the three trials, the first split was based on pain in the past week, and those reporting lower pain were less likely to be adherent. In one of these trials, the second and third splits were based on education and employment, where those with lower education levels and who were employed were less likely to be adherent. In the third trial, the two splits were based on smoking status and then marriage status, where smokers who were married were least likely to be adherent. Optimism-corrected c-statistics ranged from 0.54 to 0.63. Model-based recursive partitioning can be a useful approach to explore heterogeneity in protocol adherence in behavioral intervention trials. An important next step would be to assess whether patterns hold in other similar studies and samples. Identifying subgroups who are less likely to be adherent to an intervention can help inform modifications to the intervention to help tailor the intervention to these subgroups and increase future uptake and impact. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01828567, NCT02360293, and NCT01838226.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865420301150VeteransProtocol adherenceSubgroupModel-based recursive partitioning |