“Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction
Memories are not frozen in the past. Instead, they can be dynamically combined to allow individuals to adapt to the present or even imagine the future. This recombination, called event construction, also means that it might be possible to improve memory through specific interventions such as episodi...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01403/full |
id |
doaj-0a6839eccd5b43d1b0821f4196987e67 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0a6839eccd5b43d1b0821f4196987e672020-11-25T01:56:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-06-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.01403443023“Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event ConstructionRudy Purkart0Rémy Versace1Guillaume T. Vallet2EA 3082, Laboratoire d’Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, FranceEA 3082, Laboratoire d’Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, FranceCNRS UMR 6024, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceMemories are not frozen in the past. Instead, they can be dynamically combined to allow individuals to adapt to the present or even imagine the future. This recombination, called event construction, also means that it might be possible to improve memory through specific interventions such as episodic specificity induction (ESI). ESI provides brief training in recollecting the details of a past event that boosts the retrieval of specific details in subsequent tasks if these tasks involve the recombination of memories. However, very little is known about how event construction is accomplished, and this is essential if we are (1) to understand how episodic memory might work and (2) to promote a specific mechanism that will help people remember the past better. The present study assesses the sensorimotor simulation hypothesis, which has been proposed within the embodied approaches to cognition. According to these approaches, access to and the recombination of memories occur through the simulation of the sensory and motor propreties of our past experiences. This hypothesis was tested using a sensory interference paradigm. In a first phase, the participants watched videos and then received a specificity or a control induction. In a second phase, they described their memories of the videos while simultaneously viewing an interfering stimulus (dynamic visual noise; DVN) or a gray control screen. In line with a sensorimotor simulation account, the presentation of a DVN during the description of the videos led to a decrease in the number of internal details (details specific to the event) only after the specificity induction rather than the control induction. The findings provide evidence that the specificity induction targets and facilitates the sensorimotor simulation mechanism, thus confirming the crucial involvement of a mechanism of this sort in the constructive functioning of memory.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01403/fullevent constructionepisodic specificity inductionsensorimotor simulationsensory interferenceembodied cognition |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rudy Purkart Rémy Versace Guillaume T. Vallet |
spellingShingle |
Rudy Purkart Rémy Versace Guillaume T. Vallet “Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction Frontiers in Psychology event construction episodic specificity induction sensorimotor simulation sensory interference embodied cognition |
author_facet |
Rudy Purkart Rémy Versace Guillaume T. Vallet |
author_sort |
Rudy Purkart |
title |
“Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction |
title_short |
“Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction |
title_full |
“Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction |
title_fullStr |
“Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction |
title_sort |
“does it improve the mind’s eye?”: sensorimotor simulation in episodic event construction |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Memories are not frozen in the past. Instead, they can be dynamically combined to allow individuals to adapt to the present or even imagine the future. This recombination, called event construction, also means that it might be possible to improve memory through specific interventions such as episodic specificity induction (ESI). ESI provides brief training in recollecting the details of a past event that boosts the retrieval of specific details in subsequent tasks if these tasks involve the recombination of memories. However, very little is known about how event construction is accomplished, and this is essential if we are (1) to understand how episodic memory might work and (2) to promote a specific mechanism that will help people remember the past better. The present study assesses the sensorimotor simulation hypothesis, which has been proposed within the embodied approaches to cognition. According to these approaches, access to and the recombination of memories occur through the simulation of the sensory and motor propreties of our past experiences. This hypothesis was tested using a sensory interference paradigm. In a first phase, the participants watched videos and then received a specificity or a control induction. In a second phase, they described their memories of the videos while simultaneously viewing an interfering stimulus (dynamic visual noise; DVN) or a gray control screen. In line with a sensorimotor simulation account, the presentation of a DVN during the description of the videos led to a decrease in the number of internal details (details specific to the event) only after the specificity induction rather than the control induction. The findings provide evidence that the specificity induction targets and facilitates the sensorimotor simulation mechanism, thus confirming the crucial involvement of a mechanism of this sort in the constructive functioning of memory. |
topic |
event construction episodic specificity induction sensorimotor simulation sensory interference embodied cognition |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01403/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rudypurkart doesitimprovethemindseyesensorimotorsimulationinepisodiceventconstruction AT remyversace doesitimprovethemindseyesensorimotorsimulationinepisodiceventconstruction AT guillaumetvallet doesitimprovethemindseyesensorimotorsimulationinepisodiceventconstruction |
_version_ |
1724978243095756800 |