“Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction

Memories are not frozen in the past. Instead, they can be dynamically combined to allow individuals to adapt to the present or even imagine the future. This recombination, called event construction, also means that it might be possible to improve memory through specific interventions such as episodi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rudy Purkart, Rémy Versace, Guillaume T. Vallet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01403/full
id doaj-0a6839eccd5b43d1b0821f4196987e67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0a6839eccd5b43d1b0821f4196987e672020-11-25T01:56:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-06-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.01403443023“Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event ConstructionRudy Purkart0Rémy Versace1Guillaume T. Vallet2EA 3082, Laboratoire d’Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, FranceEA 3082, Laboratoire d’Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, FranceCNRS UMR 6024, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceMemories are not frozen in the past. Instead, they can be dynamically combined to allow individuals to adapt to the present or even imagine the future. This recombination, called event construction, also means that it might be possible to improve memory through specific interventions such as episodic specificity induction (ESI). ESI provides brief training in recollecting the details of a past event that boosts the retrieval of specific details in subsequent tasks if these tasks involve the recombination of memories. However, very little is known about how event construction is accomplished, and this is essential if we are (1) to understand how episodic memory might work and (2) to promote a specific mechanism that will help people remember the past better. The present study assesses the sensorimotor simulation hypothesis, which has been proposed within the embodied approaches to cognition. According to these approaches, access to and the recombination of memories occur through the simulation of the sensory and motor propreties of our past experiences. This hypothesis was tested using a sensory interference paradigm. In a first phase, the participants watched videos and then received a specificity or a control induction. In a second phase, they described their memories of the videos while simultaneously viewing an interfering stimulus (dynamic visual noise; DVN) or a gray control screen. In line with a sensorimotor simulation account, the presentation of a DVN during the description of the videos led to a decrease in the number of internal details (details specific to the event) only after the specificity induction rather than the control induction. The findings provide evidence that the specificity induction targets and facilitates the sensorimotor simulation mechanism, thus confirming the crucial involvement of a mechanism of this sort in the constructive functioning of memory.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01403/fullevent constructionepisodic specificity inductionsensorimotor simulationsensory interferenceembodied cognition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rudy Purkart
Rémy Versace
Guillaume T. Vallet
spellingShingle Rudy Purkart
Rémy Versace
Guillaume T. Vallet
“Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction
Frontiers in Psychology
event construction
episodic specificity induction
sensorimotor simulation
sensory interference
embodied cognition
author_facet Rudy Purkart
Rémy Versace
Guillaume T. Vallet
author_sort Rudy Purkart
title “Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction
title_short “Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction
title_full “Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction
title_fullStr “Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction
title_full_unstemmed “Does It Improve the Mind’s Eye?”: Sensorimotor Simulation in Episodic Event Construction
title_sort “does it improve the mind’s eye?”: sensorimotor simulation in episodic event construction
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Memories are not frozen in the past. Instead, they can be dynamically combined to allow individuals to adapt to the present or even imagine the future. This recombination, called event construction, also means that it might be possible to improve memory through specific interventions such as episodic specificity induction (ESI). ESI provides brief training in recollecting the details of a past event that boosts the retrieval of specific details in subsequent tasks if these tasks involve the recombination of memories. However, very little is known about how event construction is accomplished, and this is essential if we are (1) to understand how episodic memory might work and (2) to promote a specific mechanism that will help people remember the past better. The present study assesses the sensorimotor simulation hypothesis, which has been proposed within the embodied approaches to cognition. According to these approaches, access to and the recombination of memories occur through the simulation of the sensory and motor propreties of our past experiences. This hypothesis was tested using a sensory interference paradigm. In a first phase, the participants watched videos and then received a specificity or a control induction. In a second phase, they described their memories of the videos while simultaneously viewing an interfering stimulus (dynamic visual noise; DVN) or a gray control screen. In line with a sensorimotor simulation account, the presentation of a DVN during the description of the videos led to a decrease in the number of internal details (details specific to the event) only after the specificity induction rather than the control induction. The findings provide evidence that the specificity induction targets and facilitates the sensorimotor simulation mechanism, thus confirming the crucial involvement of a mechanism of this sort in the constructive functioning of memory.
topic event construction
episodic specificity induction
sensorimotor simulation
sensory interference
embodied cognition
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01403/full
work_keys_str_mv AT rudypurkart doesitimprovethemindseyesensorimotorsimulationinepisodiceventconstruction
AT remyversace doesitimprovethemindseyesensorimotorsimulationinepisodiceventconstruction
AT guillaumetvallet doesitimprovethemindseyesensorimotorsimulationinepisodiceventconstruction
_version_ 1724978243095756800