Spatial quantification of community resilience in contexts where quantitative data are scarce: The case of Muzarabani district in Zimbabwe

There has been an upsurge in tools for measuring resilience of the past decade. Despite this progress, we argue, there are few studies focusing on the spatial quantification of resilience in the context of multiple hazards, particularly in developing countries. Placing a particular emphasis on the c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emmanuel Mavhura, Bernard Manyena
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-07-01
Series:Geo: Geography and Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.65
id doaj-0a734637131e45dcb870078141c4d528
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0a734637131e45dcb870078141c4d5282020-11-25T01:54:28ZengWileyGeo: Geography and Environment2054-40492018-07-0152n/an/a10.1002/geo2.65Spatial quantification of community resilience in contexts where quantitative data are scarce: The case of Muzarabani district in ZimbabweEmmanuel Mavhura0Bernard Manyena1Department of Geography and Disaster Management Bindura University of Science Education Bindura ZimbabweFaculty of Engineering and Environment, Geography and Environmental Sciences Northumbria University Newcastle Upon Tyne UKThere has been an upsurge in tools for measuring resilience of the past decade. Despite this progress, we argue, there are few studies focusing on the spatial quantification of resilience in the context of multiple hazards, particularly in developing countries. Placing a particular emphasis on the contribution of geography to resilience studies, this paper examines the spatial variation of community resilience to disasters in Muzarabani, Zimbabwe. Place‐specific resilience variables are selected from the 2012 national census report to develop a disaster resilience index for Muzarabani district. A principal component analysis technique was used to analyse the overall and subcomponents of resilience to identify wards that needed policy intervention. Using the Geographical Information Systems tool to model the spatial variation of community resilience and its subcomponents, we found a geographic variation in community resilience across Muzarabani district, with the majority of the wards scoring low to below low levels of overall resilience. Although we view this study as being complementary to qualitative studies, it would appear quantifying and visualising resilience provide possible explanations and actions required for decision‐makers to address the resilience gaps and disaster risk reduction broadly.https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.65disaster resiliencegeographical information systemsprincipal component analysisresilience geographiesresilience variablesZimbabwe
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emmanuel Mavhura
Bernard Manyena
spellingShingle Emmanuel Mavhura
Bernard Manyena
Spatial quantification of community resilience in contexts where quantitative data are scarce: The case of Muzarabani district in Zimbabwe
Geo: Geography and Environment
disaster resilience
geographical information systems
principal component analysis
resilience geographies
resilience variables
Zimbabwe
author_facet Emmanuel Mavhura
Bernard Manyena
author_sort Emmanuel Mavhura
title Spatial quantification of community resilience in contexts where quantitative data are scarce: The case of Muzarabani district in Zimbabwe
title_short Spatial quantification of community resilience in contexts where quantitative data are scarce: The case of Muzarabani district in Zimbabwe
title_full Spatial quantification of community resilience in contexts where quantitative data are scarce: The case of Muzarabani district in Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Spatial quantification of community resilience in contexts where quantitative data are scarce: The case of Muzarabani district in Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Spatial quantification of community resilience in contexts where quantitative data are scarce: The case of Muzarabani district in Zimbabwe
title_sort spatial quantification of community resilience in contexts where quantitative data are scarce: the case of muzarabani district in zimbabwe
publisher Wiley
series Geo: Geography and Environment
issn 2054-4049
publishDate 2018-07-01
description There has been an upsurge in tools for measuring resilience of the past decade. Despite this progress, we argue, there are few studies focusing on the spatial quantification of resilience in the context of multiple hazards, particularly in developing countries. Placing a particular emphasis on the contribution of geography to resilience studies, this paper examines the spatial variation of community resilience to disasters in Muzarabani, Zimbabwe. Place‐specific resilience variables are selected from the 2012 national census report to develop a disaster resilience index for Muzarabani district. A principal component analysis technique was used to analyse the overall and subcomponents of resilience to identify wards that needed policy intervention. Using the Geographical Information Systems tool to model the spatial variation of community resilience and its subcomponents, we found a geographic variation in community resilience across Muzarabani district, with the majority of the wards scoring low to below low levels of overall resilience. Although we view this study as being complementary to qualitative studies, it would appear quantifying and visualising resilience provide possible explanations and actions required for decision‐makers to address the resilience gaps and disaster risk reduction broadly.
topic disaster resilience
geographical information systems
principal component analysis
resilience geographies
resilience variables
Zimbabwe
url https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.65
work_keys_str_mv AT emmanuelmavhura spatialquantificationofcommunityresilienceincontextswherequantitativedataarescarcethecaseofmuzarabanidistrictinzimbabwe
AT bernardmanyena spatialquantificationofcommunityresilienceincontextswherequantitativedataarescarcethecaseofmuzarabanidistrictinzimbabwe
_version_ 1724987222977937408