Compensating Balance: A Comment
Compensating balance are deposits the borrowing firm keeps with the lending bank in non-interest bearing accounts on loans. It is well known that, when there is no compensating balance imposed, the effective cost of debt remains the same in the two different payment methods, full amortization method...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universiti Utara Malaysia
2004-05-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Banking and Finance |
Online Access: | https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=387fe338-929e-4ccb-8888-204e1bfef7f9 |
id |
doaj-0a90b7e124df404c92f813e02c3423e6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0a90b7e124df404c92f813e02c3423e62021-06-15T13:16:35ZengUniversiti Utara MalaysiaInternational Journal of Banking and Finance1675-722X2004-05-0110.32890/ijbf2004.2.1.8346Compensating Balance: A CommentYoungna ChoiYeomin YoonCompensating balance are deposits the borrowing firm keeps with the lending bank in non-interest bearing accounts on loans. It is well known that, when there is no compensating balance imposed, the effective cost of debt remains the same in the two different payment methods, full amortization method and bullet loan (bond) method. It has been experimentally shown that when a compensating balance is imposed, however, the respective effective costs of debt under the two payment methods become different and that the true cost of a fully-amortized loan is always greater than that of a bullet loan. This paper provides a mathematical proof than this is always true. It concludes that, whenever a bank imposes a compensating balance, the borrowing firm should prefer a bullet loan to a fully-amortized one if it wishes to avoid an ambush posed by such a compensating balance. https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=387fe338-929e-4ccb-8888-204e1bfef7f9 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Youngna Choi Yeomin Yoon |
spellingShingle |
Youngna Choi Yeomin Yoon Compensating Balance: A Comment International Journal of Banking and Finance |
author_facet |
Youngna Choi Yeomin Yoon |
author_sort |
Youngna Choi |
title |
Compensating Balance: A Comment |
title_short |
Compensating Balance: A Comment |
title_full |
Compensating Balance: A Comment |
title_fullStr |
Compensating Balance: A Comment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Compensating Balance: A Comment |
title_sort |
compensating balance: a comment |
publisher |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
series |
International Journal of Banking and Finance |
issn |
1675-722X |
publishDate |
2004-05-01 |
description |
Compensating balance are deposits the borrowing firm keeps with the lending bank in non-interest bearing accounts on loans. It is well known that, when there is no compensating balance imposed, the effective cost of debt remains the same in the two different payment methods, full amortization method and bullet loan (bond) method. It has been experimentally shown that when a compensating balance is imposed, however, the respective effective costs of debt under the two payment methods become different and that the true cost of a fully-amortized loan is always greater than that of a bullet loan. This paper provides a mathematical proof than this is always true. It concludes that, whenever a bank imposes a compensating balance, the borrowing firm should prefer a bullet loan to a fully-amortized one if it wishes to avoid an ambush posed by such a compensating balance. |
url |
https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=387fe338-929e-4ccb-8888-204e1bfef7f9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT youngnachoi compensatingbalanceacomment AT yeominyoon compensatingbalanceacomment |
_version_ |
1721376110855323648 |