Enhanced pore space analysis by use of <i>μ</i>-CT, MIP, NMR, and SIP

<p>We investigate the pore space of rock samples with respect to different petrophysical parameters using various methods, which provide data on pore size distributions, including micro computed tomography (<i>μ</i>-CT), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), nuclear magnetic reso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Z. Zhang, S. Kruschwitz, A. Weller, M. Halisch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-11-01
Series:Solid Earth
Online Access:https://www.solid-earth.net/9/1225/2018/se-9-1225-2018.pdf
id doaj-0ac8a7ff8dae4754a24cae65dc39da0a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ac8a7ff8dae4754a24cae65dc39da0a2020-11-25T01:54:58ZengCopernicus PublicationsSolid Earth1869-95101869-95292018-11-0191225123810.5194/se-9-1225-2018Enhanced pore space analysis by use of <i>μ</i>-CT, MIP, NMR, and SIPZ. Zhang0S. Kruschwitz1S. Kruschwitz2A. Weller3M. Halisch4Southwest Petroleum University, School of Geoscience and Technology, 610500 Chengdu, ChinaFederal Institute for Material Research and Testing (BAM), 12205 Berlin, GermanyTechnische Universität Berlin, Institute of Civil Engineering, 13355 Berlin, GermanyClausthal University of Technology, Institute of Geophysics, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, GermanyLeibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics (LIAG), 30655 Hannover, Germany<p>We investigate the pore space of rock samples with respect to different petrophysical parameters using various methods, which provide data on pore size distributions, including micro computed tomography (<i>μ</i>-CT), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and spectral-induced polarization (SIP). The resulting cumulative distributions of pore volume as a function of pore size are compared. Considering that the methods differ with regard to their limits of resolution, a multiple-length-scale characterization of the pore space is proposed, that is based on a combination of the results from all of these methods. The approach is demonstrated using samples of Bentheimer and Röttbacher sandstone. Additionally, we compare the potential of SIP to provide a pore size distribution with other commonly used methods (MIP, NMR). The limits of resolution of SIP depend on the usable frequency range (between 0.002 and 100&thinsp;Hz). The methods with similar resolution show a similar behavior of the cumulative pore volume distribution in the overlapping pore size range. We assume that <i>μ</i>-CT and NMR provide the pore body size while MIP and SIP characterize the pore throat size. Our study shows that a good agreement between the pore radius distributions can only be achieved if the curves are adjusted considering the resolution and pore volume in the relevant range of pore radii. The MIP curve with the widest range in resolution should be used as reference.</p>https://www.solid-earth.net/9/1225/2018/se-9-1225-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Z. Zhang
S. Kruschwitz
S. Kruschwitz
A. Weller
M. Halisch
spellingShingle Z. Zhang
S. Kruschwitz
S. Kruschwitz
A. Weller
M. Halisch
Enhanced pore space analysis by use of <i>μ</i>-CT, MIP, NMR, and SIP
Solid Earth
author_facet Z. Zhang
S. Kruschwitz
S. Kruschwitz
A. Weller
M. Halisch
author_sort Z. Zhang
title Enhanced pore space analysis by use of <i>μ</i>-CT, MIP, NMR, and SIP
title_short Enhanced pore space analysis by use of <i>μ</i>-CT, MIP, NMR, and SIP
title_full Enhanced pore space analysis by use of <i>μ</i>-CT, MIP, NMR, and SIP
title_fullStr Enhanced pore space analysis by use of <i>μ</i>-CT, MIP, NMR, and SIP
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced pore space analysis by use of <i>μ</i>-CT, MIP, NMR, and SIP
title_sort enhanced pore space analysis by use of <i>μ</i>-ct, mip, nmr, and sip
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Solid Earth
issn 1869-9510
1869-9529
publishDate 2018-11-01
description <p>We investigate the pore space of rock samples with respect to different petrophysical parameters using various methods, which provide data on pore size distributions, including micro computed tomography (<i>μ</i>-CT), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and spectral-induced polarization (SIP). The resulting cumulative distributions of pore volume as a function of pore size are compared. Considering that the methods differ with regard to their limits of resolution, a multiple-length-scale characterization of the pore space is proposed, that is based on a combination of the results from all of these methods. The approach is demonstrated using samples of Bentheimer and Röttbacher sandstone. Additionally, we compare the potential of SIP to provide a pore size distribution with other commonly used methods (MIP, NMR). The limits of resolution of SIP depend on the usable frequency range (between 0.002 and 100&thinsp;Hz). The methods with similar resolution show a similar behavior of the cumulative pore volume distribution in the overlapping pore size range. We assume that <i>μ</i>-CT and NMR provide the pore body size while MIP and SIP characterize the pore throat size. Our study shows that a good agreement between the pore radius distributions can only be achieved if the curves are adjusted considering the resolution and pore volume in the relevant range of pore radii. The MIP curve with the widest range in resolution should be used as reference.</p>
url https://www.solid-earth.net/9/1225/2018/se-9-1225-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zzhang enhancedporespaceanalysisbyuseofimictmipnmrandsip
AT skruschwitz enhancedporespaceanalysisbyuseofimictmipnmrandsip
AT skruschwitz enhancedporespaceanalysisbyuseofimictmipnmrandsip
AT aweller enhancedporespaceanalysisbyuseofimictmipnmrandsip
AT mhalisch enhancedporespaceanalysisbyuseofimictmipnmrandsip
_version_ 1724985852715597824