Growth performance and production cost of laboratory-scale marine microalgae culture using a light-emitting diode

The effects of a light-emitting diode (LED) were examined and compared to fluorescent light on the growth performance of four marine microalgae, Nannochloropsis oculata, Tetraselmis suecica, Chaetoceros calcitrans, and Thalassiosira weissflogii cultured under laboratory conditions for 240 h (10 da...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wasana Arkronrat, Vutthichai Oniam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Prince of Songkla University 2019-10-01
Series:Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (SJST)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/journal/41-5/17.pdf
id doaj-0acdc13adef14270b53fe0a361baabf8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0acdc13adef14270b53fe0a361baabf82020-11-25T00:02:08ZengPrince of Songkla UniversitySongklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (SJST)0125-33952019-10-014151093110010.14456/sjst-psu.2019.137Growth performance and production cost of laboratory-scale marine microalgae culture using a light-emitting diodeWasana Arkronrat0Vutthichai Oniam1Klongwan Fisheries Research Station, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Mueang, Prachuap Khiri Khan, 77000 ThailandKlongwan Fisheries Research Station, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Mueang, Prachuap Khiri Khan, 77000 ThailandThe effects of a light-emitting diode (LED) were examined and compared to fluorescent light on the growth performance of four marine microalgae, Nannochloropsis oculata, Tetraselmis suecica, Chaetoceros calcitrans, and Thalassiosira weissflogii cultured under laboratory conditions for 240 h (10 days). The results showed that the cell densities of N. oculata cultured using fluorescent lamps (T1) and cool daylight LED (T2) were higher than warm white LED (T3), and the growth rate of this species using T2 were higher than for T1 and T3. The cell density of the T. suecica culture in each treatment was not different, but the growth rate using T1 was higher than for T3. The cell densities and growth rates of C. calcitrans and T. weissflogii culture in each treatment were not different. In addition, commercial Chaetoceros produced using cool daylight LED illumination had a lower production cost compared with production using cool white fluorescent illumination. Therefore, commercial laboratory-scale production of marine microalgae should use a cool daylight LED as the light source in order to reduce the production cost without affecting the growth and quality of microalgae.https://rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/journal/41-5/17.pdfmicroalgaelight-emitting diode (led)growth performanceproduction cost
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wasana Arkronrat
Vutthichai Oniam
spellingShingle Wasana Arkronrat
Vutthichai Oniam
Growth performance and production cost of laboratory-scale marine microalgae culture using a light-emitting diode
Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (SJST)
microalgae
light-emitting diode (led)
growth performance
production cost
author_facet Wasana Arkronrat
Vutthichai Oniam
author_sort Wasana Arkronrat
title Growth performance and production cost of laboratory-scale marine microalgae culture using a light-emitting diode
title_short Growth performance and production cost of laboratory-scale marine microalgae culture using a light-emitting diode
title_full Growth performance and production cost of laboratory-scale marine microalgae culture using a light-emitting diode
title_fullStr Growth performance and production cost of laboratory-scale marine microalgae culture using a light-emitting diode
title_full_unstemmed Growth performance and production cost of laboratory-scale marine microalgae culture using a light-emitting diode
title_sort growth performance and production cost of laboratory-scale marine microalgae culture using a light-emitting diode
publisher Prince of Songkla University
series Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (SJST)
issn 0125-3395
publishDate 2019-10-01
description The effects of a light-emitting diode (LED) were examined and compared to fluorescent light on the growth performance of four marine microalgae, Nannochloropsis oculata, Tetraselmis suecica, Chaetoceros calcitrans, and Thalassiosira weissflogii cultured under laboratory conditions for 240 h (10 days). The results showed that the cell densities of N. oculata cultured using fluorescent lamps (T1) and cool daylight LED (T2) were higher than warm white LED (T3), and the growth rate of this species using T2 were higher than for T1 and T3. The cell density of the T. suecica culture in each treatment was not different, but the growth rate using T1 was higher than for T3. The cell densities and growth rates of C. calcitrans and T. weissflogii culture in each treatment were not different. In addition, commercial Chaetoceros produced using cool daylight LED illumination had a lower production cost compared with production using cool white fluorescent illumination. Therefore, commercial laboratory-scale production of marine microalgae should use a cool daylight LED as the light source in order to reduce the production cost without affecting the growth and quality of microalgae.
topic microalgae
light-emitting diode (led)
growth performance
production cost
url https://rdo.psu.ac.th/sjstweb/journal/41-5/17.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT wasanaarkronrat growthperformanceandproductioncostoflaboratoryscalemarinemicroalgaecultureusingalightemittingdiode
AT vutthichaioniam growthperformanceandproductioncostoflaboratoryscalemarinemicroalgaecultureusingalightemittingdiode
_version_ 1725439299429597184