Development and implementation of the Ontario Stroke System: the use of evidence

<b>Introduction</b><br> The Ontario Stroke System was developed to enhance the quality and continuity of stroke care provided across the care continuum. <br><b>Research Objective</b> <br> To identify the role evidence played in the development and implementa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jill I. Cameron, Susan Rappolt, Mary Lewis, Renee Lyons, Grace Warner, Frank Silver
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2007-08-01
Series:International Journal of Integrated Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijic.org/articles/201
id doaj-0ae37bcdf5e94a65977679bc9180ac5b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ae37bcdf5e94a65977679bc9180ac5b2020-11-25T01:10:33ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562007-08-017310.5334/ijic.201201Development and implementation of the Ontario Stroke System: the use of evidenceJill I. CameronSusan RappoltMary LewisRenee LyonsGrace WarnerFrank Silver<b>Introduction</b><br> The Ontario Stroke System was developed to enhance the quality and continuity of stroke care provided across the care continuum. <br><b>Research Objective</b> <br> To identify the role evidence played in the development and implementation of the Ontario Stroke System. <br><b><title>Methods</b> This study employed a qualitative case study design. In-depth interviews were conducted with six members of the Ontario Stroke System provincial steering committee. Nine focus groups were conducted with: Regional Program Managers, Regional Education Coordinators, and seven acute care teams. To supplement these findings interviews were conducted with eight individuals knowledgeable about national and international models of integrated service delivery.<br> <b>Results</b><br> Our analyses identified six themes. The first four themes highlight the use of evidence to support the process of system development and implementation including: 1) informing system development; 2) mobilizing governmental support; 3) getting the system up and running; and 4) integrating services across the continuum of care. The final two themes describe the foundation required to support this process: 1) human capacity and 2) mechanisms to share evidence. <br> <b>Conclusion</b><br> This study provides guidance to support the development and implementation of evidence-based models of integrated service delivery.http://www.ijic.org/articles/201chronic carecontinuity of careintegrated caremultidisciplinary carestroke service
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jill I. Cameron
Susan Rappolt
Mary Lewis
Renee Lyons
Grace Warner
Frank Silver
spellingShingle Jill I. Cameron
Susan Rappolt
Mary Lewis
Renee Lyons
Grace Warner
Frank Silver
Development and implementation of the Ontario Stroke System: the use of evidence
International Journal of Integrated Care
chronic care
continuity of care
integrated care
multidisciplinary care
stroke service
author_facet Jill I. Cameron
Susan Rappolt
Mary Lewis
Renee Lyons
Grace Warner
Frank Silver
author_sort Jill I. Cameron
title Development and implementation of the Ontario Stroke System: the use of evidence
title_short Development and implementation of the Ontario Stroke System: the use of evidence
title_full Development and implementation of the Ontario Stroke System: the use of evidence
title_fullStr Development and implementation of the Ontario Stroke System: the use of evidence
title_full_unstemmed Development and implementation of the Ontario Stroke System: the use of evidence
title_sort development and implementation of the ontario stroke system: the use of evidence
publisher Ubiquity Press
series International Journal of Integrated Care
issn 1568-4156
publishDate 2007-08-01
description <b>Introduction</b><br> The Ontario Stroke System was developed to enhance the quality and continuity of stroke care provided across the care continuum. <br><b>Research Objective</b> <br> To identify the role evidence played in the development and implementation of the Ontario Stroke System. <br><b><title>Methods</b> This study employed a qualitative case study design. In-depth interviews were conducted with six members of the Ontario Stroke System provincial steering committee. Nine focus groups were conducted with: Regional Program Managers, Regional Education Coordinators, and seven acute care teams. To supplement these findings interviews were conducted with eight individuals knowledgeable about national and international models of integrated service delivery.<br> <b>Results</b><br> Our analyses identified six themes. The first four themes highlight the use of evidence to support the process of system development and implementation including: 1) informing system development; 2) mobilizing governmental support; 3) getting the system up and running; and 4) integrating services across the continuum of care. The final two themes describe the foundation required to support this process: 1) human capacity and 2) mechanisms to share evidence. <br> <b>Conclusion</b><br> This study provides guidance to support the development and implementation of evidence-based models of integrated service delivery.
topic chronic care
continuity of care
integrated care
multidisciplinary care
stroke service
url http://www.ijic.org/articles/201
work_keys_str_mv AT jillicameron developmentandimplementationoftheontariostrokesystemtheuseofevidence
AT susanrappolt developmentandimplementationoftheontariostrokesystemtheuseofevidence
AT marylewis developmentandimplementationoftheontariostrokesystemtheuseofevidence
AT reneelyons developmentandimplementationoftheontariostrokesystemtheuseofevidence
AT gracewarner developmentandimplementationoftheontariostrokesystemtheuseofevidence
AT franksilver developmentandimplementationoftheontariostrokesystemtheuseofevidence
_version_ 1725174098919686144