Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.

<h4>Background</h4>The SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2) is responsible for the infectious respiratory disease called COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). In response to the growing COVID-19 pandemic, point-of-care (POC) tests have been developed to detect spec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thierry Prazuck, Mathilda Colin, Susanna Giachè, Camélia Gubavu, Aymeric Seve, Vincent Rzepecki, Marie Chevereau-Choquet, Catherine Kiani, Victor Rodot, Elsa Lionnet, Laura Courtellemont, Jérôme Guinard, Gilles Pialoux, Laurent Hocqueloux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237694
id doaj-0b02c4f3e8d04a008a5fb176b6935727
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b02c4f3e8d04a008a5fb176b69357272021-03-04T11:53:50ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159e023769410.1371/journal.pone.0237694Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.Thierry PrazuckMathilda ColinSusanna GiachèCamélia GubavuAymeric SeveVincent RzepeckiMarie Chevereau-ChoquetCatherine KianiVictor RodotElsa LionnetLaura CourtellemontJérôme GuinardGilles PialouxLaurent Hocqueloux<h4>Background</h4>The SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2) is responsible for the infectious respiratory disease called COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). In response to the growing COVID-19 pandemic, point-of-care (POC) tests have been developed to detect specific antibodies, IgG and IgM, to SARS-CoV-2 virus in human whole blood. We conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate the performance of two POC tests, COVID-PRESTO® and COVID-DUO®, compared to the gold standard, RT-PCR (real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction).<h4>Methods</h4>RT-PCR testing of SARS-Cov-2 was performed from nasopharyngeal swab specimens collected in adult patients visiting the infectious disease department at the hospital (Orléans, France). Capillary whole blood (CWB) samples from the fingertip taken at different time points after onset of the disease were tested with POC tests. The specificity and sensitivity of the rapid test kits compared to test of reference (RT-PCR) were calculated.<h4>Results</h4>Among 381 patients with symptoms of COVID-19 who went to the hospital for a diagnostic, 143 patients were RT-PCR negative. Results of test with POC tests were all negative for these patients, indicating a specificity of 100% for both POC tests. In the RT-PCR positive subgroup (n = 238), 133 patients were tested with COVID-PRESTO® and 129 patients were tested with COVID-DUO® (24 patients tested with both). The further the onset of symptoms was from the date of collection, the greater the sensitivity. The sensitivity of COVID-PRESTO® test ranged from 10.00% for patients having experienced their 1st symptoms from 0 to 5 days ago to 100% in patients where symptoms had occurred more than 15 days before the date of tests. For COVID-DUO® test, the sensitivity ranged from 35.71% [0-5 days] to 100% (> 15 days).<h4>Conclusion</h4>COVID-PRESTO® and DUO® POC tests turned out to be very specific (none false positive) and to be sensitive enough after 15 days from onset of symptom. These easy to use IgG/IgM combined test kits are the first ones allowing a screening with CWB sample, by typing from a finger prick. These rapid tests are particularly interesting for screening in low resource settings.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237694
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thierry Prazuck
Mathilda Colin
Susanna Giachè
Camélia Gubavu
Aymeric Seve
Vincent Rzepecki
Marie Chevereau-Choquet
Catherine Kiani
Victor Rodot
Elsa Lionnet
Laura Courtellemont
Jérôme Guinard
Gilles Pialoux
Laurent Hocqueloux
spellingShingle Thierry Prazuck
Mathilda Colin
Susanna Giachè
Camélia Gubavu
Aymeric Seve
Vincent Rzepecki
Marie Chevereau-Choquet
Catherine Kiani
Victor Rodot
Elsa Lionnet
Laura Courtellemont
Jérôme Guinard
Gilles Pialoux
Laurent Hocqueloux
Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Thierry Prazuck
Mathilda Colin
Susanna Giachè
Camélia Gubavu
Aymeric Seve
Vincent Rzepecki
Marie Chevereau-Choquet
Catherine Kiani
Victor Rodot
Elsa Lionnet
Laura Courtellemont
Jérôme Guinard
Gilles Pialoux
Laurent Hocqueloux
author_sort Thierry Prazuck
title Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.
title_short Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.
title_full Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.
title_fullStr Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.
title_sort evaluation of performance of two sars-cov-2 rapid igm-igg combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>The SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2) is responsible for the infectious respiratory disease called COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). In response to the growing COVID-19 pandemic, point-of-care (POC) tests have been developed to detect specific antibodies, IgG and IgM, to SARS-CoV-2 virus in human whole blood. We conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate the performance of two POC tests, COVID-PRESTO® and COVID-DUO®, compared to the gold standard, RT-PCR (real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction).<h4>Methods</h4>RT-PCR testing of SARS-Cov-2 was performed from nasopharyngeal swab specimens collected in adult patients visiting the infectious disease department at the hospital (Orléans, France). Capillary whole blood (CWB) samples from the fingertip taken at different time points after onset of the disease were tested with POC tests. The specificity and sensitivity of the rapid test kits compared to test of reference (RT-PCR) were calculated.<h4>Results</h4>Among 381 patients with symptoms of COVID-19 who went to the hospital for a diagnostic, 143 patients were RT-PCR negative. Results of test with POC tests were all negative for these patients, indicating a specificity of 100% for both POC tests. In the RT-PCR positive subgroup (n = 238), 133 patients were tested with COVID-PRESTO® and 129 patients were tested with COVID-DUO® (24 patients tested with both). The further the onset of symptoms was from the date of collection, the greater the sensitivity. The sensitivity of COVID-PRESTO® test ranged from 10.00% for patients having experienced their 1st symptoms from 0 to 5 days ago to 100% in patients where symptoms had occurred more than 15 days before the date of tests. For COVID-DUO® test, the sensitivity ranged from 35.71% [0-5 days] to 100% (> 15 days).<h4>Conclusion</h4>COVID-PRESTO® and DUO® POC tests turned out to be very specific (none false positive) and to be sensitive enough after 15 days from onset of symptom. These easy to use IgG/IgM combined test kits are the first ones allowing a screening with CWB sample, by typing from a finger prick. These rapid tests are particularly interesting for screening in low resource settings.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237694
work_keys_str_mv AT thierryprazuck evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT mathildacolin evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT susannagiache evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT cameliagubavu evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT aymericseve evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT vincentrzepecki evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT mariechevereauchoquet evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT catherinekiani evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT victorrodot evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT elsalionnet evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT lauracourtellemont evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT jeromeguinard evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT gillespialoux evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
AT laurenthocqueloux evaluationofperformanceoftwosarscov2rapidigmiggcombinedantibodytestsoncapillarywholebloodsamplesfromthefingertip
_version_ 1714803168422920192