Comparing the disk-diffusion and agar dilution tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Abstract Background We assessed the validity of testing for antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical and mutant Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) isolates by disk diffusion in comparison to agar dilution, and Etest® (bioMerieux, France), respectively, for three third generation extended spectrum cephalospo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hsi Liu, Thomas H. Taylor, Kevin Pettus, Steve Johnson, John R. Papp, David Trees
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2016-11-01
Series:Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-016-0148-x
id doaj-0b2b4b08da4b489c827a4085a4278afb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b2b4b08da4b489c827a4085a4278afb2020-11-25T00:46:31ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942016-11-01511610.1186/s13756-016-0148-xComparing the disk-diffusion and agar dilution tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility testingHsi Liu0Thomas H. Taylor1Kevin Pettus2Steve Johnson3John R. Papp4David Trees5Division of STD Prevention, NCHHSTPDivision of Laboratory Systems, CSELS, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionDivision of STD Prevention, NCHHSTPDivision of STD Prevention, NCHHSTPDivision of STD Prevention, NCHHSTPDivision of STD Prevention, NCHHSTPAbstract Background We assessed the validity of testing for antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical and mutant Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) isolates by disk diffusion in comparison to agar dilution, and Etest® (bioMerieux, France), respectively, for three third generation extended spectrum cephalosporins (ESC): ceftriaxone (CRO), cefixime (CFX), and cefpodoxime (CPD). Methods One hundred and five clinical isolates and ten laboratory-mutants were tested following Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) and manufacturer’s standards for each of the three methods. The measured diameters by the disk diffusion method were tested for correlation with the MIC values by agar dilution. In addition, comparisons with the Etest® were made. Categorical results for concordance, based on standard CLSI cutoffs, between the disk diffusion and the other two methods, respectively, were tested using the Chi-square statistics. Reproducibility was tested for CFX across a 6-month interval by repeated disk tests. Results Across all 115 specimens, the disk diffusion tests produced good categorical agreements, exhibiting concordance of 93.1%, 92.1%, and 90.4% with agar dilution and 93.0%, 92.1%, and 90.4% with Etest®, for CRO, CFX, and CPD, respectively. Pearson correlations between disk-diffusion diameters and agar dilution MIC’s were -0.59, -0.67, and -0.81 for CRO, CFX, and CPD, respectively. The correlations between disk diffusion and Etest® were -0.58, -0.73, and -0.49. Pearson correlation between the CFX disk readings over a 6-month interval was 91%. Conclusions Disk diffusion tests remain to be a useful, reliable and fast screening method for qualitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing for ceftriaxone, cefixime, and cefpodoxime.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-016-0148-xAntibioticSusceptibility testingCeftriaxoneCefiximeNeisseriaGonorrhoeae
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hsi Liu
Thomas H. Taylor
Kevin Pettus
Steve Johnson
John R. Papp
David Trees
spellingShingle Hsi Liu
Thomas H. Taylor
Kevin Pettus
Steve Johnson
John R. Papp
David Trees
Comparing the disk-diffusion and agar dilution tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antibiotic
Susceptibility testing
Ceftriaxone
Cefixime
Neisseria
Gonorrhoeae
author_facet Hsi Liu
Thomas H. Taylor
Kevin Pettus
Steve Johnson
John R. Papp
David Trees
author_sort Hsi Liu
title Comparing the disk-diffusion and agar dilution tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility testing
title_short Comparing the disk-diffusion and agar dilution tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility testing
title_full Comparing the disk-diffusion and agar dilution tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility testing
title_fullStr Comparing the disk-diffusion and agar dilution tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility testing
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the disk-diffusion and agar dilution tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility testing
title_sort comparing the disk-diffusion and agar dilution tests for neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility testing
publisher BMC
series Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
issn 2047-2994
publishDate 2016-11-01
description Abstract Background We assessed the validity of testing for antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical and mutant Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) isolates by disk diffusion in comparison to agar dilution, and Etest® (bioMerieux, France), respectively, for three third generation extended spectrum cephalosporins (ESC): ceftriaxone (CRO), cefixime (CFX), and cefpodoxime (CPD). Methods One hundred and five clinical isolates and ten laboratory-mutants were tested following Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) and manufacturer’s standards for each of the three methods. The measured diameters by the disk diffusion method were tested for correlation with the MIC values by agar dilution. In addition, comparisons with the Etest® were made. Categorical results for concordance, based on standard CLSI cutoffs, between the disk diffusion and the other two methods, respectively, were tested using the Chi-square statistics. Reproducibility was tested for CFX across a 6-month interval by repeated disk tests. Results Across all 115 specimens, the disk diffusion tests produced good categorical agreements, exhibiting concordance of 93.1%, 92.1%, and 90.4% with agar dilution and 93.0%, 92.1%, and 90.4% with Etest®, for CRO, CFX, and CPD, respectively. Pearson correlations between disk-diffusion diameters and agar dilution MIC’s were -0.59, -0.67, and -0.81 for CRO, CFX, and CPD, respectively. The correlations between disk diffusion and Etest® were -0.58, -0.73, and -0.49. Pearson correlation between the CFX disk readings over a 6-month interval was 91%. Conclusions Disk diffusion tests remain to be a useful, reliable and fast screening method for qualitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing for ceftriaxone, cefixime, and cefpodoxime.
topic Antibiotic
Susceptibility testing
Ceftriaxone
Cefixime
Neisseria
Gonorrhoeae
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-016-0148-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiliu comparingthediskdiffusionandagardilutiontestsforneisseriagonorrhoeaeantimicrobialsusceptibilitytesting
AT thomashtaylor comparingthediskdiffusionandagardilutiontestsforneisseriagonorrhoeaeantimicrobialsusceptibilitytesting
AT kevinpettus comparingthediskdiffusionandagardilutiontestsforneisseriagonorrhoeaeantimicrobialsusceptibilitytesting
AT stevejohnson comparingthediskdiffusionandagardilutiontestsforneisseriagonorrhoeaeantimicrobialsusceptibilitytesting
AT johnrpapp comparingthediskdiffusionandagardilutiontestsforneisseriagonorrhoeaeantimicrobialsusceptibilitytesting
AT davidtrees comparingthediskdiffusionandagardilutiontestsforneisseriagonorrhoeaeantimicrobialsusceptibilitytesting
_version_ 1725264827794849792