Improvements to the Red List Index.

The Red List Index uses information from the IUCN Red List to track trends in the projected overall extinction risk of sets of species. It has been widely recognised as an important component of the suite of indicators needed to measure progress towards the international target of significantly redu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stuart H M Butchart, H Resit Akçakaya, Janice Chanson, Jonathan E M Baillie, Ben Collen, Suhel Quader, Will R Turner, Rajan Amin, Simon N Stuart, Craig Hilton-Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2007-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000140
id doaj-0b5a656343634c9490613a3f85bb0c5f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b5a656343634c9490613a3f85bb0c5f2021-03-03T19:55:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032007-01-0121e14010.1371/journal.pone.0000140Improvements to the Red List Index.Stuart H M ButchartH Resit AkçakayaJanice ChansonJonathan E M BaillieBen CollenSuhel QuaderWill R TurnerRajan AminSimon N StuartCraig Hilton-TaylorThe Red List Index uses information from the IUCN Red List to track trends in the projected overall extinction risk of sets of species. It has been widely recognised as an important component of the suite of indicators needed to measure progress towards the international target of significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. However, further application of the RLI (to non-avian taxa in particular) has revealed some shortcomings in the original formula and approach: It performs inappropriately when a value of zero is reached; RLI values are affected by the frequency of assessments; and newly evaluated species may introduce bias. Here we propose a revision to the formula, and recommend how it should be applied in order to overcome these shortcomings. Two additional advantages of the revisions are that assessment errors are not propagated through time, and the overall level extinction risk can be determined as well as trends in this over time.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000140
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stuart H M Butchart
H Resit Akçakaya
Janice Chanson
Jonathan E M Baillie
Ben Collen
Suhel Quader
Will R Turner
Rajan Amin
Simon N Stuart
Craig Hilton-Taylor
spellingShingle Stuart H M Butchart
H Resit Akçakaya
Janice Chanson
Jonathan E M Baillie
Ben Collen
Suhel Quader
Will R Turner
Rajan Amin
Simon N Stuart
Craig Hilton-Taylor
Improvements to the Red List Index.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Stuart H M Butchart
H Resit Akçakaya
Janice Chanson
Jonathan E M Baillie
Ben Collen
Suhel Quader
Will R Turner
Rajan Amin
Simon N Stuart
Craig Hilton-Taylor
author_sort Stuart H M Butchart
title Improvements to the Red List Index.
title_short Improvements to the Red List Index.
title_full Improvements to the Red List Index.
title_fullStr Improvements to the Red List Index.
title_full_unstemmed Improvements to the Red List Index.
title_sort improvements to the red list index.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2007-01-01
description The Red List Index uses information from the IUCN Red List to track trends in the projected overall extinction risk of sets of species. It has been widely recognised as an important component of the suite of indicators needed to measure progress towards the international target of significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. However, further application of the RLI (to non-avian taxa in particular) has revealed some shortcomings in the original formula and approach: It performs inappropriately when a value of zero is reached; RLI values are affected by the frequency of assessments; and newly evaluated species may introduce bias. Here we propose a revision to the formula, and recommend how it should be applied in order to overcome these shortcomings. Two additional advantages of the revisions are that assessment errors are not propagated through time, and the overall level extinction risk can be determined as well as trends in this over time.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000140
work_keys_str_mv AT stuarthmbutchart improvementstotheredlistindex
AT hresitakcakaya improvementstotheredlistindex
AT janicechanson improvementstotheredlistindex
AT jonathanembaillie improvementstotheredlistindex
AT bencollen improvementstotheredlistindex
AT suhelquader improvementstotheredlistindex
AT willrturner improvementstotheredlistindex
AT rajanamin improvementstotheredlistindex
AT simonnstuart improvementstotheredlistindex
AT craighiltontaylor improvementstotheredlistindex
_version_ 1714824892930588672