Are PDFs still consistent with Tevatron data?
As active data taking has moved to the LHC at CERN, more and more LHC data have been included into fits of parton distribution functions. An anomaly has arisen where formerly excellent agreement between theoretical predictions and experiment in single-top-quark production at the Tevatron is no longe...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
EDP Sciences
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | EPJ Web of Conferences |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817203008 |
| id |
doaj-0b5cac0550f14f68a658da561ebf3e19 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-0b5cac0550f14f68a658da561ebf3e192021-08-02T20:06:44ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2018-01-011720300810.1051/epjconf/201817203008epjconf_ismd2018_03008Are PDFs still consistent with Tevatron data?Sullivan ZackAs active data taking has moved to the LHC at CERN, more and more LHC data have been included into fits of parton distribution functions. An anomaly has arisen where formerly excellent agreement between theoretical predictions and experiment in single-top-quark production at the Tevatron is no longer quite as good. Is this indicative of a deeper issue?https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817203008 |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Sullivan Zack |
| spellingShingle |
Sullivan Zack Are PDFs still consistent with Tevatron data? EPJ Web of Conferences |
| author_facet |
Sullivan Zack |
| author_sort |
Sullivan Zack |
| title |
Are PDFs still consistent with Tevatron data? |
| title_short |
Are PDFs still consistent with Tevatron data? |
| title_full |
Are PDFs still consistent with Tevatron data? |
| title_fullStr |
Are PDFs still consistent with Tevatron data? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Are PDFs still consistent with Tevatron data? |
| title_sort |
are pdfs still consistent with tevatron data? |
| publisher |
EDP Sciences |
| series |
EPJ Web of Conferences |
| issn |
2100-014X |
| publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
| description |
As active data taking has moved to the LHC at CERN, more and more LHC data have been included into fits of parton distribution functions. An anomaly has arisen where formerly excellent agreement between theoretical predictions and experiment in single-top-quark production at the Tevatron is no longer quite as good. Is this indicative of a deeper issue? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817203008 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT sullivanzack arepdfsstillconsistentwithtevatrondata |
| _version_ |
1721227244627558400 |