Early Warning Systems: Lost in Translation or Late by Definition? A FORIN Approach

Abstract Early warning systems (EWSs) are widely considered to be one of the most important mechanisms to prevent disasters around the globe. But as disasters continue to affect countries where EWSs have already been implemented, the striking disaster consequences have led us to reflect on the focus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irasema Alcántara-Ayala, Anthony Oliver-Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-09-01
Series:International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-019-00231-3
id doaj-0b65f76c387246e7b899316c64d2d443
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b65f76c387246e7b899316c64d2d4432020-11-25T03:14:14ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Science2095-00552192-63952019-09-0110331733110.1007/s13753-019-00231-3Early Warning Systems: Lost in Translation or Late by Definition? A FORIN ApproachIrasema Alcántara-Ayala0Anthony Oliver-Smith1Institute of Geography, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)University of FloridaAbstract Early warning systems (EWSs) are widely considered to be one of the most important mechanisms to prevent disasters around the globe. But as disasters continue to affect countries where EWSs have already been implemented, the striking disaster consequences have led us to reflect on the focus, architecture, and function of the warning systems. Since the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami there has been a rapid rise in the promotion and use of EWSs to minimize disaster losses and damage. However, few researchers have addressed the question of their acceptability as an adaptive measure to the existing exposure conditions. EWSs are far more linked to emergency response and humanitarian crises and accepted technological interventions as solutions than they are to explicitly advance integrated analysis, disaster risk reduction, and policy making. A major flaw of EWSs is that the term “early” has been essentially used in reference to the speed of hazard onset, founded on a physicalist perspective that has encouraged a considerable dependence on technology. In this article we address the need for a clear understanding of the root causes and risk drivers of disaster risk creation, as advanced in the FORIN (forensic investigation of disasters) approach, as a prerequisite for the development of more articulated EWSs that could contribute to disaster risk reduction through policy making and practice, based on integrated and transdisciplinary management, in the interest of sustainable development, and human welfare and well-being.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-019-00231-3Disaster risk driversDisaster root causesEarly warning systemsForensic disaster investigationsFORIN
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Irasema Alcántara-Ayala
Anthony Oliver-Smith
spellingShingle Irasema Alcántara-Ayala
Anthony Oliver-Smith
Early Warning Systems: Lost in Translation or Late by Definition? A FORIN Approach
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Disaster risk drivers
Disaster root causes
Early warning systems
Forensic disaster investigations
FORIN
author_facet Irasema Alcántara-Ayala
Anthony Oliver-Smith
author_sort Irasema Alcántara-Ayala
title Early Warning Systems: Lost in Translation or Late by Definition? A FORIN Approach
title_short Early Warning Systems: Lost in Translation or Late by Definition? A FORIN Approach
title_full Early Warning Systems: Lost in Translation or Late by Definition? A FORIN Approach
title_fullStr Early Warning Systems: Lost in Translation or Late by Definition? A FORIN Approach
title_full_unstemmed Early Warning Systems: Lost in Translation or Late by Definition? A FORIN Approach
title_sort early warning systems: lost in translation or late by definition? a forin approach
publisher SpringerOpen
series International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
issn 2095-0055
2192-6395
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Abstract Early warning systems (EWSs) are widely considered to be one of the most important mechanisms to prevent disasters around the globe. But as disasters continue to affect countries where EWSs have already been implemented, the striking disaster consequences have led us to reflect on the focus, architecture, and function of the warning systems. Since the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami there has been a rapid rise in the promotion and use of EWSs to minimize disaster losses and damage. However, few researchers have addressed the question of their acceptability as an adaptive measure to the existing exposure conditions. EWSs are far more linked to emergency response and humanitarian crises and accepted technological interventions as solutions than they are to explicitly advance integrated analysis, disaster risk reduction, and policy making. A major flaw of EWSs is that the term “early” has been essentially used in reference to the speed of hazard onset, founded on a physicalist perspective that has encouraged a considerable dependence on technology. In this article we address the need for a clear understanding of the root causes and risk drivers of disaster risk creation, as advanced in the FORIN (forensic investigation of disasters) approach, as a prerequisite for the development of more articulated EWSs that could contribute to disaster risk reduction through policy making and practice, based on integrated and transdisciplinary management, in the interest of sustainable development, and human welfare and well-being.
topic Disaster risk drivers
Disaster root causes
Early warning systems
Forensic disaster investigations
FORIN
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-019-00231-3
work_keys_str_mv AT irasemaalcantaraayala earlywarningsystemslostintranslationorlatebydefinitionaforinapproach
AT anthonyoliversmith earlywarningsystemslostintranslationorlatebydefinitionaforinapproach
_version_ 1724643702890037248