A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
Abstract Background Maternal obesity increases women’s risk of poor birth outcomes, and statistics show that Pakistani and Bangladeshi women (who are born or settled) in the UK experience higher rates of perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies than white British or white Other women. This study...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4211-1 |
id |
doaj-0b7c8144a96c40259f606458e654b4d8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0b7c8144a96c40259f606458e654b4d82020-11-24T21:36:19ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582017-04-011711710.1186/s12889-017-4211-1A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective dataRebecca Garcia0Nasreen Ali1Andy Guppy2Malcolm Griffiths3Gurch Randhawa4Institute for Health Research, The University of BedfordshireInstitute for Health Research, The University of BedfordshireThe Institute for Applied Social Sciences, The University of BedfordshireThe Luton & Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation TrustInstitute for Health Research, The University of BedfordshireAbstract Background Maternal obesity increases women’s risk of poor birth outcomes, and statistics show that Pakistani and Bangladeshi women (who are born or settled) in the UK experience higher rates of perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies than white British or white Other women. This study compares the prevalence of maternal obesity in Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British women using standard and Asian-specific BMI metrics. Method Retrospective cross-sectional analysis using routinely recorded secondary data in Ciconia Maternity information System (CMiS), between 2008 and 2013. Mothers (n = 15,205) whose ethnicity was recorded as white British, Bangladeshi, Pakistani or Indian. Adjusted standardised residuals and Pearson Chi-square. Main outcome measures: Percentage of mothers stratified by ethnicity (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British) who are classified as overweight or obese using standard and revised World Health Organisation BMI thresholds. Results Compared to standard BMI thresholds, using the revised BMI threshold resulted in a higher prevalence of obesity: 22.8% of Indian and 24.3% of Bangladeshi and 32.3% of Pakistani women. Pearson Chi-square confirmed that significantly more Pakistani women were classified as ‘obese’ compared with white British, Indian or Bangladeshi women (χ 2 = 499,88 df = 9, p < 0.001). Conclusions There are differences in the prevalence of obese and overweight women stratified by maternal ethnicity of white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi. Using revised anthropometric measures in Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi women has clinical implications for identifying risks associated with obesity and increased complications in pregnancy.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4211-1South AsianPakistaniIndian BangladeshiBMIMaternal obesityWhite British |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rebecca Garcia Nasreen Ali Andy Guppy Malcolm Griffiths Gurch Randhawa |
spellingShingle |
Rebecca Garcia Nasreen Ali Andy Guppy Malcolm Griffiths Gurch Randhawa A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data BMC Public Health South Asian Pakistani Indian Bangladeshi BMI Maternal obesity White British |
author_facet |
Rebecca Garcia Nasreen Ali Andy Guppy Malcolm Griffiths Gurch Randhawa |
author_sort |
Rebecca Garcia |
title |
A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data |
title_short |
A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data |
title_full |
A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data |
title_sort |
comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white british, indian, pakistani and bangladeshi pregnant women in england; analysis of retrospective data |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Public Health |
issn |
1471-2458 |
publishDate |
2017-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Maternal obesity increases women’s risk of poor birth outcomes, and statistics show that Pakistani and Bangladeshi women (who are born or settled) in the UK experience higher rates of perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies than white British or white Other women. This study compares the prevalence of maternal obesity in Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British women using standard and Asian-specific BMI metrics. Method Retrospective cross-sectional analysis using routinely recorded secondary data in Ciconia Maternity information System (CMiS), between 2008 and 2013. Mothers (n = 15,205) whose ethnicity was recorded as white British, Bangladeshi, Pakistani or Indian. Adjusted standardised residuals and Pearson Chi-square. Main outcome measures: Percentage of mothers stratified by ethnicity (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British) who are classified as overweight or obese using standard and revised World Health Organisation BMI thresholds. Results Compared to standard BMI thresholds, using the revised BMI threshold resulted in a higher prevalence of obesity: 22.8% of Indian and 24.3% of Bangladeshi and 32.3% of Pakistani women. Pearson Chi-square confirmed that significantly more Pakistani women were classified as ‘obese’ compared with white British, Indian or Bangladeshi women (χ 2 = 499,88 df = 9, p < 0.001). Conclusions There are differences in the prevalence of obese and overweight women stratified by maternal ethnicity of white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi. Using revised anthropometric measures in Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi women has clinical implications for identifying risks associated with obesity and increased complications in pregnancy. |
topic |
South Asian Pakistani Indian Bangladeshi BMI Maternal obesity White British |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4211-1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rebeccagarcia acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata AT nasreenali acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata AT andyguppy acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata AT malcolmgriffiths acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata AT gurchrandhawa acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata AT rebeccagarcia comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata AT nasreenali comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata AT andyguppy comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata AT malcolmgriffiths comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata AT gurchrandhawa comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata |
_version_ |
1725941697664253952 |