A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data

Abstract Background Maternal obesity increases women’s risk of poor birth outcomes, and statistics show that Pakistani and Bangladeshi women (who are born or settled) in the UK experience higher rates of perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies than white British or white Other women. This study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca Garcia, Nasreen Ali, Andy Guppy, Malcolm Griffiths, Gurch Randhawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-04-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
BMI
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4211-1
id doaj-0b7c8144a96c40259f606458e654b4d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b7c8144a96c40259f606458e654b4d82020-11-24T21:36:19ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582017-04-011711710.1186/s12889-017-4211-1A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective dataRebecca Garcia0Nasreen Ali1Andy Guppy2Malcolm Griffiths3Gurch Randhawa4Institute for Health Research, The University of BedfordshireInstitute for Health Research, The University of BedfordshireThe Institute for Applied Social Sciences, The University of BedfordshireThe Luton & Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation TrustInstitute for Health Research, The University of BedfordshireAbstract Background Maternal obesity increases women’s risk of poor birth outcomes, and statistics show that Pakistani and Bangladeshi women (who are born or settled) in the UK experience higher rates of perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies than white British or white Other women. This study compares the prevalence of maternal obesity in Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British women using standard and Asian-specific BMI metrics. Method Retrospective cross-sectional analysis using routinely recorded secondary data in Ciconia Maternity information System (CMiS), between 2008 and 2013. Mothers (n = 15,205) whose ethnicity was recorded as white British, Bangladeshi, Pakistani or Indian. Adjusted standardised residuals and Pearson Chi-square. Main outcome measures: Percentage of mothers stratified by ethnicity (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British) who are classified as overweight or obese using standard and revised World Health Organisation BMI thresholds. Results Compared to standard BMI thresholds, using the revised BMI threshold resulted in a higher prevalence of obesity: 22.8% of Indian and 24.3% of Bangladeshi and 32.3% of Pakistani women. Pearson Chi-square confirmed that significantly more Pakistani women were classified as ‘obese’ compared with white British, Indian or Bangladeshi women (χ 2  = 499,88 df = 9, p < 0.001). Conclusions There are differences in the prevalence of obese and overweight women stratified by maternal ethnicity of white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi. Using revised anthropometric measures in Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi women has clinical implications for identifying risks associated with obesity and increased complications in pregnancy.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4211-1South AsianPakistaniIndian BangladeshiBMIMaternal obesityWhite British
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rebecca Garcia
Nasreen Ali
Andy Guppy
Malcolm Griffiths
Gurch Randhawa
spellingShingle Rebecca Garcia
Nasreen Ali
Andy Guppy
Malcolm Griffiths
Gurch Randhawa
A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
BMC Public Health
South Asian
Pakistani
Indian Bangladeshi
BMI
Maternal obesity
White British
author_facet Rebecca Garcia
Nasreen Ali
Andy Guppy
Malcolm Griffiths
Gurch Randhawa
author_sort Rebecca Garcia
title A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
title_short A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
title_full A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
title_fullStr A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
title_sort comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white british, indian, pakistani and bangladeshi pregnant women in england; analysis of retrospective data
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Abstract Background Maternal obesity increases women’s risk of poor birth outcomes, and statistics show that Pakistani and Bangladeshi women (who are born or settled) in the UK experience higher rates of perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies than white British or white Other women. This study compares the prevalence of maternal obesity in Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British women using standard and Asian-specific BMI metrics. Method Retrospective cross-sectional analysis using routinely recorded secondary data in Ciconia Maternity information System (CMiS), between 2008 and 2013. Mothers (n = 15,205) whose ethnicity was recorded as white British, Bangladeshi, Pakistani or Indian. Adjusted standardised residuals and Pearson Chi-square. Main outcome measures: Percentage of mothers stratified by ethnicity (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British) who are classified as overweight or obese using standard and revised World Health Organisation BMI thresholds. Results Compared to standard BMI thresholds, using the revised BMI threshold resulted in a higher prevalence of obesity: 22.8% of Indian and 24.3% of Bangladeshi and 32.3% of Pakistani women. Pearson Chi-square confirmed that significantly more Pakistani women were classified as ‘obese’ compared with white British, Indian or Bangladeshi women (χ 2  = 499,88 df = 9, p < 0.001). Conclusions There are differences in the prevalence of obese and overweight women stratified by maternal ethnicity of white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi. Using revised anthropometric measures in Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi women has clinical implications for identifying risks associated with obesity and increased complications in pregnancy.
topic South Asian
Pakistani
Indian Bangladeshi
BMI
Maternal obesity
White British
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4211-1
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccagarcia acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT nasreenali acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT andyguppy acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT malcolmgriffiths acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT gurchrandhawa acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT rebeccagarcia comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT nasreenali comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT andyguppy comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT malcolmgriffiths comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT gurchrandhawa comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
_version_ 1725941697664253952