Measurements of Gun Tube Motion and Muzzle Pointing Error of Main Battle Tanks
Beginning in 1990, the US Army Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) began testing a prototype cannon mounted in a non-armored turret fitted to an M1A1 Abrams tank chassis. The cannon design incorporated a longer gun tube as a means to increase projectile velocity. A significant increase in projectile impact d...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2001-01-01
|
Series: | Shock and Vibration |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2001/183251 |
id |
doaj-0b80e67efc624a43a66852db5f90b9f5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0b80e67efc624a43a66852db5f90b9f52020-11-24T22:30:07ZengHindawi LimitedShock and Vibration1070-96221875-92032001-01-0183-415716610.1155/2001/183251Measurements of Gun Tube Motion and Muzzle Pointing Error of Main Battle TanksPeter L. McCall0US Army Aberdeen Test Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5059, USABeginning in 1990, the US Army Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) began testing a prototype cannon mounted in a non-armored turret fitted to an M1A1 Abrams tank chassis. The cannon design incorporated a longer gun tube as a means to increase projectile velocity. A significant increase in projectile impact dispersion was measured early in the test program. Through investigative efforts, the cause of the error was linked to the increased dynamic bending or flexure of the longer tube observed while the vehicle was moving. Research and investigative work was conducted through a collaborative effort with the US Army Research Laboratory, Benet Laboratory, Project Manager – Tank Main Armament Systems, US Army Research and Engineering Center, and Cadillac Gage Textron Inc. New test methods, instrumentation, data analysis procedures, and stabilization control design resulted through this series of investigations into the dynamic tube flexure error source. Through this joint research, improvements in tank fire control design have been developed to improve delivery accuracy. This paper discusses the instrumentation implemented, methods applied, and analysis procedures used to characterize the tube flexure during dynamic tests of a main battle tank and the relationship between gun pointing error and muzzle pointing error.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2001/183251 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peter L. McCall |
spellingShingle |
Peter L. McCall Measurements of Gun Tube Motion and Muzzle Pointing Error of Main Battle Tanks Shock and Vibration |
author_facet |
Peter L. McCall |
author_sort |
Peter L. McCall |
title |
Measurements of Gun Tube Motion and Muzzle Pointing Error of Main Battle Tanks |
title_short |
Measurements of Gun Tube Motion and Muzzle Pointing Error of Main Battle Tanks |
title_full |
Measurements of Gun Tube Motion and Muzzle Pointing Error of Main Battle Tanks |
title_fullStr |
Measurements of Gun Tube Motion and Muzzle Pointing Error of Main Battle Tanks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measurements of Gun Tube Motion and Muzzle Pointing Error of Main Battle Tanks |
title_sort |
measurements of gun tube motion and muzzle pointing error of main battle tanks |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Shock and Vibration |
issn |
1070-9622 1875-9203 |
publishDate |
2001-01-01 |
description |
Beginning in 1990, the US Army Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) began testing a prototype cannon mounted in a non-armored turret fitted to an M1A1 Abrams tank chassis. The cannon design incorporated a longer gun tube as a means to increase projectile velocity. A significant increase in projectile impact dispersion was measured early in the test program. Through investigative efforts, the cause of the error was linked to the increased dynamic bending or flexure of the longer tube observed while the vehicle was moving. Research and investigative work was conducted through a collaborative effort with the US Army Research Laboratory, Benet Laboratory, Project Manager – Tank Main Armament Systems, US Army Research and Engineering Center, and Cadillac Gage Textron Inc. New test methods, instrumentation, data analysis procedures, and stabilization control design resulted through this series of investigations into the dynamic tube flexure error source. Through this joint research, improvements in tank fire control design have been developed to improve delivery accuracy. This paper discusses the instrumentation implemented, methods applied, and analysis procedures used to characterize the tube flexure during dynamic tests of a main battle tank and the relationship between gun pointing error and muzzle pointing error. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2001/183251 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peterlmccall measurementsofguntubemotionandmuzzlepointingerrorofmainbattletanks |
_version_ |
1725741933988413440 |