Comparison of Salivary Anti Helicobacter pylori IgG with Serum IgG and Bacteriological Tests in Detecting Helicobacter pylori Infections

Background: This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting
 anti-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) specific IgG antibodies in specimens of oral fluid and serum with bacteriological tests.
 Methods: Antral biopsy specimens, as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H Ghasemian safaei, A Fazeli, H Tamizifar, N Rashidi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2005-01-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Online Access:http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/342
id doaj-0bbabdb8296048368728343f8454c7d5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0bbabdb8296048368728343f8454c7d52020-11-24T23:32:26ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362005-01-0110115Comparison of Salivary Anti Helicobacter pylori IgG with Serum IgG and Bacteriological Tests in Detecting Helicobacter pylori InfectionsH Ghasemian safaeiA FazeliH TamizifarN RashidiBackground: This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting
 anti-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) specific IgG antibodies in specimens of oral fluid and serum with bacteriological tests.
 Methods: Antral biopsy specimens, as well as serum and oral fluid samples were collected from 97 patients who underwent
 upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The presence or absence of current H. pylori infection was determined by culture, histology
 and urease detection. Anti-H. pylori specific IgG was detected in serum and oral fluid, using an established lab-made, and a
 commercial ELISA kit. The obtained data were compared with results of bacteriological tests.
 Results: In all, 62 (64%) of 97 patients were positive for H. pylori by one or more of the gold standard tests (culture, histology
 and urease detection). Lab-made enzyme-linked immunoassay of oral fluid had a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and
 83% respectively. A sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 83%, respectively, was obtained with the commercial kit. Lab-made
 enzyme-linked immunoassay of serum samples had a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 88%, respectively. A sensitivity of
 86% and specificity of 86% was obtained with the commercial kit.
 Conclusion: Detection of anti-H. pylori specific IgG in oral fluid by ELISA is comparable in sensitivity and specificity with
 serum based methods. Oral fluid based ELISA could provide a reliable, non-invasive method for the diagnosis of H. pylori
 infection. Saliva testing may have a role in epidemiological studies.
 
 Keywords: Helicobacter pylori, ELISA, Oral fluid http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/342
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H Ghasemian safaei
A Fazeli
H Tamizifar
N Rashidi
spellingShingle H Ghasemian safaei
A Fazeli
H Tamizifar
N Rashidi
Comparison of Salivary Anti Helicobacter pylori IgG with Serum IgG and Bacteriological Tests in Detecting Helicobacter pylori Infections
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
author_facet H Ghasemian safaei
A Fazeli
H Tamizifar
N Rashidi
author_sort H Ghasemian safaei
title Comparison of Salivary Anti Helicobacter pylori IgG with Serum IgG and Bacteriological Tests in Detecting Helicobacter pylori Infections
title_short Comparison of Salivary Anti Helicobacter pylori IgG with Serum IgG and Bacteriological Tests in Detecting Helicobacter pylori Infections
title_full Comparison of Salivary Anti Helicobacter pylori IgG with Serum IgG and Bacteriological Tests in Detecting Helicobacter pylori Infections
title_fullStr Comparison of Salivary Anti Helicobacter pylori IgG with Serum IgG and Bacteriological Tests in Detecting Helicobacter pylori Infections
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Salivary Anti Helicobacter pylori IgG with Serum IgG and Bacteriological Tests in Detecting Helicobacter pylori Infections
title_sort comparison of salivary anti helicobacter pylori igg with serum igg and bacteriological tests in detecting helicobacter pylori infections
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
publishDate 2005-01-01
description Background: This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting
 anti-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) specific IgG antibodies in specimens of oral fluid and serum with bacteriological tests.
 Methods: Antral biopsy specimens, as well as serum and oral fluid samples were collected from 97 patients who underwent
 upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The presence or absence of current H. pylori infection was determined by culture, histology
 and urease detection. Anti-H. pylori specific IgG was detected in serum and oral fluid, using an established lab-made, and a
 commercial ELISA kit. The obtained data were compared with results of bacteriological tests.
 Results: In all, 62 (64%) of 97 patients were positive for H. pylori by one or more of the gold standard tests (culture, histology
 and urease detection). Lab-made enzyme-linked immunoassay of oral fluid had a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and
 83% respectively. A sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 83%, respectively, was obtained with the commercial kit. Lab-made
 enzyme-linked immunoassay of serum samples had a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 88%, respectively. A sensitivity of
 86% and specificity of 86% was obtained with the commercial kit.
 Conclusion: Detection of anti-H. pylori specific IgG in oral fluid by ELISA is comparable in sensitivity and specificity with
 serum based methods. Oral fluid based ELISA could provide a reliable, non-invasive method for the diagnosis of H. pylori
 infection. Saliva testing may have a role in epidemiological studies.
 
 Keywords: Helicobacter pylori, ELISA, Oral fluid
url http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/342
work_keys_str_mv AT hghasemiansafaei comparisonofsalivaryantihelicobacterpyloriiggwithserumiggandbacteriologicaltestsindetectinghelicobacterpyloriinfections
AT afazeli comparisonofsalivaryantihelicobacterpyloriiggwithserumiggandbacteriologicaltestsindetectinghelicobacterpyloriinfections
AT htamizifar comparisonofsalivaryantihelicobacterpyloriiggwithserumiggandbacteriologicaltestsindetectinghelicobacterpyloriinfections
AT nrashidi comparisonofsalivaryantihelicobacterpyloriiggwithserumiggandbacteriologicaltestsindetectinghelicobacterpyloriinfections
_version_ 1725534194704056320