Real-World Evidence: The Low Validity of Temperature Screening for COVID-19 Triage

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced health-related organizations to rapidly launch country-wide procedures that were easy to use and inexpensive. Body temperature measurement with non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) is among the most common procedures, both in hospital settings and in man...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bogdan C. Pană, Henrique Lopes, Florentina Furtunescu, Diogo Franco, Anca Rapcea, Mihai Stanca, Alina Tănase, Anca Coliţă
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.672698/full
id doaj-0bbbbb17a45549e983537179b629d252
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0bbbbb17a45549e983537179b629d2522021-06-30T04:49:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652021-06-01910.3389/fpubh.2021.672698672698Real-World Evidence: The Low Validity of Temperature Screening for COVID-19 TriageBogdan C. Pană0Henrique Lopes1Florentina Furtunescu2Diogo Franco3Anca Rapcea4Mihai Stanca5Alina Tănase6Anca Coliţă7Department of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila Bucharest, Bucharest, RomaniaPublic Health Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa (Catholic University of Portugal), Lisbon, PortugalDepartment of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila Bucharest, Bucharest, RomaniaPublic Health Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa (Catholic University of Portugal), Lisbon, PortugalDepartment of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila Bucharest, Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila Bucharest, Bucharest, RomaniaBone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila Bucharest, Bucharest, RomaniaBackground: The COVID-19 pandemic forced health-related organizations to rapidly launch country-wide procedures that were easy to use and inexpensive. Body temperature measurement with non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) is among the most common procedures, both in hospital settings and in many other entities. However, practical hospital experiences have raised great doubts about the procedure's validity.Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the body temperature measured using NCITs among oncological and transplant patients who took the polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-Cov-2 PCR+ and PCR- in a Romanian Hospital.Methods: Body temperature was measured for 5,231 inpatients using NCITs. The cutoff point for fever was equal to or above 37.3°C. Patients then completed a questionnaire about their symptoms, contact, and travel history.Findings: Fever was detected in five of 53 persons with PCR+, resulting in a sensitivity of 9.43% (95% CI, 3.13–20.66%). No fever was verified in 5,131 of 5,171 persons with PCR-, resulting in a specificity of 99.15% (95% CI, 98.86–99.38%). A defensive vision of NCIT procedure (maximum standard error only in favor) had a sensitivity of 15.09% (95% CI, 6.75–27.59%).Conclusions: The use of NCITs in a triage provides little value for detection of COVID-19. Moreover, it provides a false sense of protection against the disease while possibly discriminating individuals that could present fever due to other reasons, such as oncologic treatments, where fever is a common therapeutical consequence. The consumption of qualified human resources should be considered, especially in the context of the shortage of healthcare professionals worldwide.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.672698/fulltriagescreeningnon-contact temperature measurementCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bogdan C. Pană
Henrique Lopes
Florentina Furtunescu
Diogo Franco
Anca Rapcea
Mihai Stanca
Alina Tănase
Anca Coliţă
spellingShingle Bogdan C. Pană
Henrique Lopes
Florentina Furtunescu
Diogo Franco
Anca Rapcea
Mihai Stanca
Alina Tănase
Anca Coliţă
Real-World Evidence: The Low Validity of Temperature Screening for COVID-19 Triage
Frontiers in Public Health
triage
screening
non-contact temperature measurement
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
author_facet Bogdan C. Pană
Henrique Lopes
Florentina Furtunescu
Diogo Franco
Anca Rapcea
Mihai Stanca
Alina Tănase
Anca Coliţă
author_sort Bogdan C. Pană
title Real-World Evidence: The Low Validity of Temperature Screening for COVID-19 Triage
title_short Real-World Evidence: The Low Validity of Temperature Screening for COVID-19 Triage
title_full Real-World Evidence: The Low Validity of Temperature Screening for COVID-19 Triage
title_fullStr Real-World Evidence: The Low Validity of Temperature Screening for COVID-19 Triage
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Evidence: The Low Validity of Temperature Screening for COVID-19 Triage
title_sort real-world evidence: the low validity of temperature screening for covid-19 triage
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Public Health
issn 2296-2565
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced health-related organizations to rapidly launch country-wide procedures that were easy to use and inexpensive. Body temperature measurement with non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) is among the most common procedures, both in hospital settings and in many other entities. However, practical hospital experiences have raised great doubts about the procedure's validity.Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the body temperature measured using NCITs among oncological and transplant patients who took the polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-Cov-2 PCR+ and PCR- in a Romanian Hospital.Methods: Body temperature was measured for 5,231 inpatients using NCITs. The cutoff point for fever was equal to or above 37.3°C. Patients then completed a questionnaire about their symptoms, contact, and travel history.Findings: Fever was detected in five of 53 persons with PCR+, resulting in a sensitivity of 9.43% (95% CI, 3.13–20.66%). No fever was verified in 5,131 of 5,171 persons with PCR-, resulting in a specificity of 99.15% (95% CI, 98.86–99.38%). A defensive vision of NCIT procedure (maximum standard error only in favor) had a sensitivity of 15.09% (95% CI, 6.75–27.59%).Conclusions: The use of NCITs in a triage provides little value for detection of COVID-19. Moreover, it provides a false sense of protection against the disease while possibly discriminating individuals that could present fever due to other reasons, such as oncologic treatments, where fever is a common therapeutical consequence. The consumption of qualified human resources should be considered, especially in the context of the shortage of healthcare professionals worldwide.
topic triage
screening
non-contact temperature measurement
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.672698/full
work_keys_str_mv AT bogdancpana realworldevidencethelowvalidityoftemperaturescreeningforcovid19triage
AT henriquelopes realworldevidencethelowvalidityoftemperaturescreeningforcovid19triage
AT florentinafurtunescu realworldevidencethelowvalidityoftemperaturescreeningforcovid19triage
AT diogofranco realworldevidencethelowvalidityoftemperaturescreeningforcovid19triage
AT ancarapcea realworldevidencethelowvalidityoftemperaturescreeningforcovid19triage
AT mihaistanca realworldevidencethelowvalidityoftemperaturescreeningforcovid19triage
AT alinatanase realworldevidencethelowvalidityoftemperaturescreeningforcovid19triage
AT ancacolita realworldevidencethelowvalidityoftemperaturescreeningforcovid19triage
_version_ 1721353570607955968