Trust, Mistrust and Distrust: A Gendered Perspective on Meanings and Measurements

Recent work has emphasised the need for greater nuance in qualifying both the presence and absence of political trust in different political systems. The concept of trust may thus be more effectively perceived and analysed as a family with trust, mistrust, and distrust as its members. Expanding to a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hannah Bunting, Jennifer Gaskell, Gerry Stoker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Political Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.642129/full
id doaj-0bc620e636fc4bcbaf17bb00daaf34d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0bc620e636fc4bcbaf17bb00daaf34d42021-07-06T06:52:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Political Science2673-31452021-07-01310.3389/fpos.2021.642129642129Trust, Mistrust and Distrust: A Gendered Perspective on Meanings and MeasurementsHannah BuntingJennifer GaskellGerry StokerRecent work has emphasised the need for greater nuance in qualifying both the presence and absence of political trust in different political systems. The concept of trust may thus be more effectively perceived and analysed as a family with trust, mistrust, and distrust as its members. Expanding to a family of trust means that new ways of capturing these attitudes in empirical survey work may be needed and a way of critically driving that exploration is to investigate how gender influences how they are understood. In this paper, we use insights from focus group discussions on a series of newly designed trust, mistrust and distrust questions to identify: 1) how citizens perceive these different concepts and 2) how gendered these perceptions are. We then draw on new survey data gathered through the TrustGov project to test how the focus group findings impact survey responses and thus identify: 3) which survey questions are more likely to effectively measure the three concepts. We show that the differences highlighted in our qualitative work underscore the need to develop a more systematic mixed methods research agenda on both the expanded family of political trust and gender. We emphasise that global comparative work to capture diverse gender effects across different political systems are the necessary next steps for the field.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.642129/fullpolitical trustgenderquestion interpretationmixed methodspolitical mistrustpolitical distrust
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hannah Bunting
Jennifer Gaskell
Gerry Stoker
spellingShingle Hannah Bunting
Jennifer Gaskell
Gerry Stoker
Trust, Mistrust and Distrust: A Gendered Perspective on Meanings and Measurements
Frontiers in Political Science
political trust
gender
question interpretation
mixed methods
political mistrust
political distrust
author_facet Hannah Bunting
Jennifer Gaskell
Gerry Stoker
author_sort Hannah Bunting
title Trust, Mistrust and Distrust: A Gendered Perspective on Meanings and Measurements
title_short Trust, Mistrust and Distrust: A Gendered Perspective on Meanings and Measurements
title_full Trust, Mistrust and Distrust: A Gendered Perspective on Meanings and Measurements
title_fullStr Trust, Mistrust and Distrust: A Gendered Perspective on Meanings and Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Trust, Mistrust and Distrust: A Gendered Perspective on Meanings and Measurements
title_sort trust, mistrust and distrust: a gendered perspective on meanings and measurements
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Political Science
issn 2673-3145
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Recent work has emphasised the need for greater nuance in qualifying both the presence and absence of political trust in different political systems. The concept of trust may thus be more effectively perceived and analysed as a family with trust, mistrust, and distrust as its members. Expanding to a family of trust means that new ways of capturing these attitudes in empirical survey work may be needed and a way of critically driving that exploration is to investigate how gender influences how they are understood. In this paper, we use insights from focus group discussions on a series of newly designed trust, mistrust and distrust questions to identify: 1) how citizens perceive these different concepts and 2) how gendered these perceptions are. We then draw on new survey data gathered through the TrustGov project to test how the focus group findings impact survey responses and thus identify: 3) which survey questions are more likely to effectively measure the three concepts. We show that the differences highlighted in our qualitative work underscore the need to develop a more systematic mixed methods research agenda on both the expanded family of political trust and gender. We emphasise that global comparative work to capture diverse gender effects across different political systems are the necessary next steps for the field.
topic political trust
gender
question interpretation
mixed methods
political mistrust
political distrust
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.642129/full
work_keys_str_mv AT hannahbunting trustmistrustanddistrustagenderedperspectiveonmeaningsandmeasurements
AT jennifergaskell trustmistrustanddistrustagenderedperspectiveonmeaningsandmeasurements
AT gerrystoker trustmistrustanddistrustagenderedperspectiveonmeaningsandmeasurements
_version_ 1721318044997779456