A method for dynamic subtraction MR imaging of the liver

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Subtraction of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D Magnetic Resonance (DCE-MR) volumes can result in images that depict and accurately characterize a variety of liver lesions. However, the diagnostic utility of subtraction images depends on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Setti Ernesto, Potepan Paolo, Lucesoli Agnese, Passera Katia M, Mainardi Luca T, Musumeci Renato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-06-01
Series:BMC Medical Imaging
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/6/5
Description
Summary:<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Subtraction of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D Magnetic Resonance (DCE-MR) volumes can result in images that depict and accurately characterize a variety of liver lesions. However, the diagnostic utility of subtraction images depends on the extent of co-registration between non-enhanced and enhanced volumes. Movement of liver structures during acquisition must be corrected prior to subtraction. Currently available methods are computer intensive. We report a new method for the dynamic subtraction of MR liver images that does not require excessive computer time.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Nineteen consecutive patients (median age 45 years; range 37–67) were evaluated by VIBE T1-weighted sequences (TR 5.2 ms, TE 2.6 ms, flip angle 20°, slice thickness 1.5 mm) acquired before and 45s after contrast injection. Acquisition parameters were optimized for best portal system enhancement. Pre and post-contrast liver volumes were realigned using our 3D registration method which combines: (a) rigid 3D translation using maximization of normalized mutual information (NMI), and (b) fast 2D non-rigid registration which employs a complex discrete wavelet transform algorithm to maximize pixel phase correlation and perform multiresolution analysis. Registration performance was assessed quantitatively by NMI.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The new registration procedure was able to realign liver structures in all 19 patients. NMI increased by about 8% after rigid registration (native vs. rigid registration 0.073 ± 0.031 vs. 0.078 ± 0.031, n.s., paired <it>t</it>-test) and by a further 23% (0.096 ± 0.035 vs. 0.078 ± 0.031, p < 0.001, paired <it>t</it>-test) after non-rigid realignment. The overall average NMI increase was 31%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This new method for realigning dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR volumes of liver leads to subtraction images that enhance diagnostic possibilities for liver lesions.</p>
ISSN:1471-2342