A method for dynamic subtraction MR imaging of the liver
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Subtraction of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D Magnetic Resonance (DCE-MR) volumes can result in images that depict and accurately characterize a variety of liver lesions. However, the diagnostic utility of subtraction images depends on...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2006-06-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Imaging |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/6/5 |
id |
doaj-0be05a8def754460ac8eeb6090ce4eae |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0be05a8def754460ac8eeb6090ce4eae2020-11-24T22:22:57ZengBMCBMC Medical Imaging1471-23422006-06-0161510.1186/1471-2342-6-5A method for dynamic subtraction MR imaging of the liverSetti ErnestoPotepan PaoloLucesoli AgnesePassera Katia MMainardi Luca TMusumeci Renato<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Subtraction of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D Magnetic Resonance (DCE-MR) volumes can result in images that depict and accurately characterize a variety of liver lesions. However, the diagnostic utility of subtraction images depends on the extent of co-registration between non-enhanced and enhanced volumes. Movement of liver structures during acquisition must be corrected prior to subtraction. Currently available methods are computer intensive. We report a new method for the dynamic subtraction of MR liver images that does not require excessive computer time.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Nineteen consecutive patients (median age 45 years; range 37–67) were evaluated by VIBE T1-weighted sequences (TR 5.2 ms, TE 2.6 ms, flip angle 20°, slice thickness 1.5 mm) acquired before and 45s after contrast injection. Acquisition parameters were optimized for best portal system enhancement. Pre and post-contrast liver volumes were realigned using our 3D registration method which combines: (a) rigid 3D translation using maximization of normalized mutual information (NMI), and (b) fast 2D non-rigid registration which employs a complex discrete wavelet transform algorithm to maximize pixel phase correlation and perform multiresolution analysis. Registration performance was assessed quantitatively by NMI.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The new registration procedure was able to realign liver structures in all 19 patients. NMI increased by about 8% after rigid registration (native vs. rigid registration 0.073 ± 0.031 vs. 0.078 ± 0.031, n.s., paired <it>t</it>-test) and by a further 23% (0.096 ± 0.035 vs. 0.078 ± 0.031, p < 0.001, paired <it>t</it>-test) after non-rigid realignment. The overall average NMI increase was 31%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This new method for realigning dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR volumes of liver leads to subtraction images that enhance diagnostic possibilities for liver lesions.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/6/5 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Setti Ernesto Potepan Paolo Lucesoli Agnese Passera Katia M Mainardi Luca T Musumeci Renato |
spellingShingle |
Setti Ernesto Potepan Paolo Lucesoli Agnese Passera Katia M Mainardi Luca T Musumeci Renato A method for dynamic subtraction MR imaging of the liver BMC Medical Imaging |
author_facet |
Setti Ernesto Potepan Paolo Lucesoli Agnese Passera Katia M Mainardi Luca T Musumeci Renato |
author_sort |
Setti Ernesto |
title |
A method for dynamic subtraction MR imaging of the liver |
title_short |
A method for dynamic subtraction MR imaging of the liver |
title_full |
A method for dynamic subtraction MR imaging of the liver |
title_fullStr |
A method for dynamic subtraction MR imaging of the liver |
title_full_unstemmed |
A method for dynamic subtraction MR imaging of the liver |
title_sort |
method for dynamic subtraction mr imaging of the liver |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medical Imaging |
issn |
1471-2342 |
publishDate |
2006-06-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Subtraction of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D Magnetic Resonance (DCE-MR) volumes can result in images that depict and accurately characterize a variety of liver lesions. However, the diagnostic utility of subtraction images depends on the extent of co-registration between non-enhanced and enhanced volumes. Movement of liver structures during acquisition must be corrected prior to subtraction. Currently available methods are computer intensive. We report a new method for the dynamic subtraction of MR liver images that does not require excessive computer time.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Nineteen consecutive patients (median age 45 years; range 37–67) were evaluated by VIBE T1-weighted sequences (TR 5.2 ms, TE 2.6 ms, flip angle 20°, slice thickness 1.5 mm) acquired before and 45s after contrast injection. Acquisition parameters were optimized for best portal system enhancement. Pre and post-contrast liver volumes were realigned using our 3D registration method which combines: (a) rigid 3D translation using maximization of normalized mutual information (NMI), and (b) fast 2D non-rigid registration which employs a complex discrete wavelet transform algorithm to maximize pixel phase correlation and perform multiresolution analysis. Registration performance was assessed quantitatively by NMI.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The new registration procedure was able to realign liver structures in all 19 patients. NMI increased by about 8% after rigid registration (native vs. rigid registration 0.073 ± 0.031 vs. 0.078 ± 0.031, n.s., paired <it>t</it>-test) and by a further 23% (0.096 ± 0.035 vs. 0.078 ± 0.031, p < 0.001, paired <it>t</it>-test) after non-rigid realignment. The overall average NMI increase was 31%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This new method for realigning dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR volumes of liver leads to subtraction images that enhance diagnostic possibilities for liver lesions.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/6/5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT settiernesto amethodfordynamicsubtractionmrimagingoftheliver AT potepanpaolo amethodfordynamicsubtractionmrimagingoftheliver AT lucesoliagnese amethodfordynamicsubtractionmrimagingoftheliver AT passerakatiam amethodfordynamicsubtractionmrimagingoftheliver AT mainardilucat amethodfordynamicsubtractionmrimagingoftheliver AT musumecirenato amethodfordynamicsubtractionmrimagingoftheliver AT settiernesto methodfordynamicsubtractionmrimagingoftheliver AT potepanpaolo methodfordynamicsubtractionmrimagingoftheliver AT lucesoliagnese methodfordynamicsubtractionmrimagingoftheliver AT passerakatiam methodfordynamicsubtractionmrimagingoftheliver AT mainardilucat methodfordynamicsubtractionmrimagingoftheliver AT musumecirenato methodfordynamicsubtractionmrimagingoftheliver |
_version_ |
1725766618112327680 |