Interactive Open Access Publishing and Peer Review: The Effectiveness and Perspectives of Transparency and Self-Regulation in Scientific Communication and Evaluation
The traditional forms of scientific publishing and peer review do not live up to the demands of efficient communication and quality assurance in today's highly diverse and rapidly evolving world of science. They need to be advanced by interactive and transparent forms of review, publication and...
Main Author: | Ulrich Poschl |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
openjournals.nl
2010-02-01
|
Series: | Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://test.openjournals.nl/liberquarterly/article/view/10559 |
Similar Items
-
Interactive Open Access Publishing and Peer Review: The Effectiveness and Perspectives of Transparency and Self-Regulation in Scientific Communication and Evaluation
by: Ulrich Poschl
Published: (2010-02-01) -
Multi-stage open peer review: scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation
by: Ulrich ePöschl
Published: (2012-07-01) -
An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing
by: Nikolaus eKriegeskorte, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01) -
Innovations in scholarly peer review at Nature Publishing Group and Palgrave Macmillan
by: Amy Bourke-Waite
Published: (2015-07-01) -
Moving peer review transparency from process to praxis
by: Emily Ford
Published: (2019-10-01)