Libertarianism and Circumcision
Despite the millenniums-old tradition in Abrahamic circles of removing the foreskin of a penis at birth, the involuntary and aggressive practice of circumcision must not be made an exception to the natural, negative right to self-ownership—a birthright which should prevent a parent from physically h...
Main Authors: | Patrick Testa, Walter E. Block |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2014-06-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijhpm.com/pdf_2849_e82a50040b519aedb554abd1ec5d35d2.html |
Similar Items
-
Catastrophic Complications of Circumcision by Traditional Circumcisers
by: Ahmed F, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Penile injury due to blunt trauma after circumcision in a male child: A case report
by: Hulya Ozturk, et al.
Published: (2014-08-01) -
Female circumcision in Islamic and Health Perspective in Bogor, West Java
by: Jubaedah Jubaedah
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Should routine neonatal circumcision be a policy to prevent penile cancer? | Opinion: No
by: Dominic H. Tang, et al. -
An unanswered question in pediatric urology: the post pubertal persistence of prepubertal congenital penile curvature correction by tunical plication
by: Ünsal Ozkuvanci, et al.