Response of “Red Globe” (Vitis vinifera L.) to cane girdling

The effect of cane girdling on skin colour, harvest date, yield, and some quality characteristics of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Red Globe table grape variety, was measured over two growing seasons, 2013–2014, at the facility of Manisa Viticulture Research Station in Turkey. Cane girdling was performed on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soltekin Oğuzhan, Teker Turcan, Erdem Adnan, Kacar Ege, Altindişli Ahmet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2015-01-01
Series:BIO Web of Conferences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20150501019
id doaj-0c33892c1cba4b84a2d70a54f2c43a39
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c33892c1cba4b84a2d70a54f2c43a392021-04-02T19:47:21ZengEDP SciencesBIO Web of Conferences2117-44582015-01-0150101910.1051/bioconf/20150501019bioconf_oiv2015_01019Response of “Red Globe” (Vitis vinifera L.) to cane girdlingSoltekin OğuzhanTeker TurcanErdem AdnanKacar EgeAltindişli AhmetThe effect of cane girdling on skin colour, harvest date, yield, and some quality characteristics of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Red Globe table grape variety, was measured over two growing seasons, 2013–2014, at the facility of Manisa Viticulture Research Station in Turkey. Cane girdling was performed on the spurs after first bud was left from the bottom and 4 mm-wide ring of bark was completely removed with a doubleded knife at veraison period. Statistical analyses showed that total soluble solid content, berry width, berry length, colour parameters, CIRG index and anthocyanin content of the Red Globe was significantly affected by the girdling treatment in both years, 2013 and 2014. In addition it was detected that any effect of girdling treatments cannot be determined statistically significant on total yield, marketable yield, total phenolics, titrable acidity, pH and 50 berry weight. Total and marketable yields of girdled vines had higher value although they weren’t statistically significant. Furthermore it was observed on girdled vines 7 and 11 days earliness compare to the control vines in 2013 and 2014, respectively.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20150501019
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Soltekin Oğuzhan
Teker Turcan
Erdem Adnan
Kacar Ege
Altindişli Ahmet
spellingShingle Soltekin Oğuzhan
Teker Turcan
Erdem Adnan
Kacar Ege
Altindişli Ahmet
Response of “Red Globe” (Vitis vinifera L.) to cane girdling
BIO Web of Conferences
author_facet Soltekin Oğuzhan
Teker Turcan
Erdem Adnan
Kacar Ege
Altindişli Ahmet
author_sort Soltekin Oğuzhan
title Response of “Red Globe” (Vitis vinifera L.) to cane girdling
title_short Response of “Red Globe” (Vitis vinifera L.) to cane girdling
title_full Response of “Red Globe” (Vitis vinifera L.) to cane girdling
title_fullStr Response of “Red Globe” (Vitis vinifera L.) to cane girdling
title_full_unstemmed Response of “Red Globe” (Vitis vinifera L.) to cane girdling
title_sort response of “red globe” (vitis vinifera l.) to cane girdling
publisher EDP Sciences
series BIO Web of Conferences
issn 2117-4458
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The effect of cane girdling on skin colour, harvest date, yield, and some quality characteristics of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Red Globe table grape variety, was measured over two growing seasons, 2013–2014, at the facility of Manisa Viticulture Research Station in Turkey. Cane girdling was performed on the spurs after first bud was left from the bottom and 4 mm-wide ring of bark was completely removed with a doubleded knife at veraison period. Statistical analyses showed that total soluble solid content, berry width, berry length, colour parameters, CIRG index and anthocyanin content of the Red Globe was significantly affected by the girdling treatment in both years, 2013 and 2014. In addition it was detected that any effect of girdling treatments cannot be determined statistically significant on total yield, marketable yield, total phenolics, titrable acidity, pH and 50 berry weight. Total and marketable yields of girdled vines had higher value although they weren’t statistically significant. Furthermore it was observed on girdled vines 7 and 11 days earliness compare to the control vines in 2013 and 2014, respectively.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20150501019
work_keys_str_mv AT soltekinoguzhan responseofredglobevitisviniferaltocanegirdling
AT tekerturcan responseofredglobevitisviniferaltocanegirdling
AT erdemadnan responseofredglobevitisviniferaltocanegirdling
AT kacarege responseofredglobevitisviniferaltocanegirdling
AT altindisliahmet responseofredglobevitisviniferaltocanegirdling
_version_ 1721548325071618048