Does biological relatedness affect child survival?
Objective: We studied child survival in Rakai, Uganda where many children are fostered out or orphaned. Methods: Biological relatedness is measured as the average of the Wright's coefficients between each household member and the child. Instrumental variables for fostering include proportion of...
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
2003-05-01
|
Series: | Demographic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol8/9/ |
id |
doaj-0c61ea4860b740c6be20dbb2e7369e18 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0c61ea4860b740c6be20dbb2e7369e182020-11-24T22:32:46ZengMax Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchDemographic Research1435-98712003-05-0189Does biological relatedness affect child survival?Objective: We studied child survival in Rakai, Uganda where many children are fostered out or orphaned. Methods: Biological relatedness is measured as the average of the Wright's coefficients between each household member and the child. Instrumental variables for fostering include proportion of adult males in household, age and gender of household head. Control variables include SES, religion, polygyny, household size, child age, child birth size, and child HIV status. Results: Presence of both parents in the household increased the odds of survival by 28%. After controlling for the endogeneity of child placement decisions in a multivariate model we found that lower biological relatedness of a child was associated with statistically significant reductions in child survival. The effects of biological relatedness on child survival tend to be stronger for both HIV- and HIV+ children of HIV+ mothers. Conclusions: Reductions in the numbers of close relatives caring for children of HIV+ mothers reduce child survival.http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol8/9/AIDS/HIVchild survivalorphans |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
title |
Does biological relatedness affect child survival? |
spellingShingle |
Does biological relatedness affect child survival? Demographic Research AIDS/HIV child survival orphans |
title_short |
Does biological relatedness affect child survival? |
title_full |
Does biological relatedness affect child survival? |
title_fullStr |
Does biological relatedness affect child survival? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does biological relatedness affect child survival? |
title_sort |
does biological relatedness affect child survival? |
publisher |
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research |
series |
Demographic Research |
issn |
1435-9871 |
publishDate |
2003-05-01 |
description |
Objective: We studied child survival in Rakai, Uganda where many children are fostered out or orphaned. Methods: Biological relatedness is measured as the average of the Wright's coefficients between each household member and the child. Instrumental variables for fostering include proportion of adult males in household, age and gender of household head. Control variables include SES, religion, polygyny, household size, child age, child birth size, and child HIV status. Results: Presence of both parents in the household increased the odds of survival by 28%. After controlling for the endogeneity of child placement decisions in a multivariate model we found that lower biological relatedness of a child was associated with statistically significant reductions in child survival. The effects of biological relatedness on child survival tend to be stronger for both HIV- and HIV+ children of HIV+ mothers. Conclusions: Reductions in the numbers of close relatives caring for children of HIV+ mothers reduce child survival. |
topic |
AIDS/HIV child survival orphans |
url |
http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol8/9/ |
_version_ |
1725732557435174912 |