Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.

The diagnostic performance of the widely-used Cervista HPV HR test was compared to the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test in a Dutch population-based cervical cancer screening program. In 900 scrapings of women with normal cytomorphology, specificity was 90% (95%CI: 87.84-91.87) for the Cervista HPV HR tes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aniek Boers, Lorian Slagter-Menkema, Bettien M van Hemel, Jerome L Belinson, Teus Ruitenbeek, Henk J Buikema, Harry Klip, Hilde Ghyssaert, Ate G J van der Zee, Geertruida H de Bock, G Bea A Wisman, Ed Schuuring
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4106783?pdf=render
id doaj-0c8dce2d75e74cf99be51b66ec381d3f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c8dce2d75e74cf99be51b66ec381d3f2020-11-24T22:07:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0197e10193010.1371/journal.pone.0101930Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.Aniek BoersLorian Slagter-MenkemaBettien M van HemelJerome L BelinsonTeus RuitenbeekHenk J BuikemaHarry KlipHilde GhyssaertAte G J van der ZeeGeertruida H de BockG Bea A WismanEd SchuuringThe diagnostic performance of the widely-used Cervista HPV HR test was compared to the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test in a Dutch population-based cervical cancer screening program. In 900 scrapings of women with normal cytomorphology, specificity was 90% (95%CI: 87.84-91.87) for the Cervista HPV HR test and 96% (95%CI: 94.76-97.37) for the HC2 test with 93% agreement between both tests (κ = 0.5, p<0.001). The sensitivity for CIN2+ using 65 scrapings of women with histological-confirmed CIN2+ was 91% (95%CI: 80.97-96.51) for the Cervista HPV HR test and 92% (95%CI: 82.94-97.43) for the HC2 test with 95% agreement between both tests (κ = 0.7, p<0.001). Fifty-seven of 60 HC2 negative/Cervista positive cases tested HPV-negative with PCR-based HPV assays; of these cases 56% were defined as Cervista triple-positive with FOZ values in all 3 mixes higher than the second cut-off of 1.93 (as set by manufacturer). By setting this cut-off at 5.0, specificity improved significantly without affecting sensitivity. External validation of this new cut-off at 5.0 in triple-positive scrapings of women selected from the SHENCCASTII database revealed that 22/24 histological normal cases now tested HPV-negative in the Cervista HPV HR test, while CIN2+ lesions remained HPV-positive. The intra-laboratory reproducibility of the Cervista HPV HR test (n = 510) showed a concordance of 92% and 93% for cut-off 1.93 and 5.0 (κ = 0.83 and κ = 0.84, p<0.001) and inter-laboratory agreement of the Cervista HPV HR test was 90% and 93% for cut-off 1.93 and 5.0 (κ = 0.80 and κ = 0.85, p<0.001). In conclusion, the specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test could be improved significantly by increasing the second cut-off from 1.93 to 5.0, without affecting the sensitivity of the test in a population-based screening setting.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4106783?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aniek Boers
Lorian Slagter-Menkema
Bettien M van Hemel
Jerome L Belinson
Teus Ruitenbeek
Henk J Buikema
Harry Klip
Hilde Ghyssaert
Ate G J van der Zee
Geertruida H de Bock
G Bea A Wisman
Ed Schuuring
spellingShingle Aniek Boers
Lorian Slagter-Menkema
Bettien M van Hemel
Jerome L Belinson
Teus Ruitenbeek
Henk J Buikema
Harry Klip
Hilde Ghyssaert
Ate G J van der Zee
Geertruida H de Bock
G Bea A Wisman
Ed Schuuring
Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Aniek Boers
Lorian Slagter-Menkema
Bettien M van Hemel
Jerome L Belinson
Teus Ruitenbeek
Henk J Buikema
Harry Klip
Hilde Ghyssaert
Ate G J van der Zee
Geertruida H de Bock
G Bea A Wisman
Ed Schuuring
author_sort Aniek Boers
title Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.
title_short Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.
title_full Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.
title_fullStr Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.
title_sort comparing the cervista hpv hr test and hybrid capture 2 assay in a dutch screening population: improved specificity of the cervista hpv hr test by changing the cut-off.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The diagnostic performance of the widely-used Cervista HPV HR test was compared to the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test in a Dutch population-based cervical cancer screening program. In 900 scrapings of women with normal cytomorphology, specificity was 90% (95%CI: 87.84-91.87) for the Cervista HPV HR test and 96% (95%CI: 94.76-97.37) for the HC2 test with 93% agreement between both tests (κ = 0.5, p<0.001). The sensitivity for CIN2+ using 65 scrapings of women with histological-confirmed CIN2+ was 91% (95%CI: 80.97-96.51) for the Cervista HPV HR test and 92% (95%CI: 82.94-97.43) for the HC2 test with 95% agreement between both tests (κ = 0.7, p<0.001). Fifty-seven of 60 HC2 negative/Cervista positive cases tested HPV-negative with PCR-based HPV assays; of these cases 56% were defined as Cervista triple-positive with FOZ values in all 3 mixes higher than the second cut-off of 1.93 (as set by manufacturer). By setting this cut-off at 5.0, specificity improved significantly without affecting sensitivity. External validation of this new cut-off at 5.0 in triple-positive scrapings of women selected from the SHENCCASTII database revealed that 22/24 histological normal cases now tested HPV-negative in the Cervista HPV HR test, while CIN2+ lesions remained HPV-positive. The intra-laboratory reproducibility of the Cervista HPV HR test (n = 510) showed a concordance of 92% and 93% for cut-off 1.93 and 5.0 (κ = 0.83 and κ = 0.84, p<0.001) and inter-laboratory agreement of the Cervista HPV HR test was 90% and 93% for cut-off 1.93 and 5.0 (κ = 0.80 and κ = 0.85, p<0.001). In conclusion, the specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test could be improved significantly by increasing the second cut-off from 1.93 to 5.0, without affecting the sensitivity of the test in a population-based screening setting.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4106783?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT aniekboers comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff
AT lorianslagtermenkema comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff
AT bettienmvanhemel comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff
AT jeromelbelinson comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff
AT teusruitenbeek comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff
AT henkjbuikema comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff
AT harryklip comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff
AT hildeghyssaert comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff
AT ategjvanderzee comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff
AT geertruidahdebock comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff
AT gbeaawisman comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff
AT edschuuring comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff
_version_ 1725818493046095872