Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.
The diagnostic performance of the widely-used Cervista HPV HR test was compared to the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test in a Dutch population-based cervical cancer screening program. In 900 scrapings of women with normal cytomorphology, specificity was 90% (95%CI: 87.84-91.87) for the Cervista HPV HR tes...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4106783?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-0c8dce2d75e74cf99be51b66ec381d3f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0c8dce2d75e74cf99be51b66ec381d3f2020-11-24T22:07:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0197e10193010.1371/journal.pone.0101930Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.Aniek BoersLorian Slagter-MenkemaBettien M van HemelJerome L BelinsonTeus RuitenbeekHenk J BuikemaHarry KlipHilde GhyssaertAte G J van der ZeeGeertruida H de BockG Bea A WismanEd SchuuringThe diagnostic performance of the widely-used Cervista HPV HR test was compared to the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test in a Dutch population-based cervical cancer screening program. In 900 scrapings of women with normal cytomorphology, specificity was 90% (95%CI: 87.84-91.87) for the Cervista HPV HR test and 96% (95%CI: 94.76-97.37) for the HC2 test with 93% agreement between both tests (κ = 0.5, p<0.001). The sensitivity for CIN2+ using 65 scrapings of women with histological-confirmed CIN2+ was 91% (95%CI: 80.97-96.51) for the Cervista HPV HR test and 92% (95%CI: 82.94-97.43) for the HC2 test with 95% agreement between both tests (κ = 0.7, p<0.001). Fifty-seven of 60 HC2 negative/Cervista positive cases tested HPV-negative with PCR-based HPV assays; of these cases 56% were defined as Cervista triple-positive with FOZ values in all 3 mixes higher than the second cut-off of 1.93 (as set by manufacturer). By setting this cut-off at 5.0, specificity improved significantly without affecting sensitivity. External validation of this new cut-off at 5.0 in triple-positive scrapings of women selected from the SHENCCASTII database revealed that 22/24 histological normal cases now tested HPV-negative in the Cervista HPV HR test, while CIN2+ lesions remained HPV-positive. The intra-laboratory reproducibility of the Cervista HPV HR test (n = 510) showed a concordance of 92% and 93% for cut-off 1.93 and 5.0 (κ = 0.83 and κ = 0.84, p<0.001) and inter-laboratory agreement of the Cervista HPV HR test was 90% and 93% for cut-off 1.93 and 5.0 (κ = 0.80 and κ = 0.85, p<0.001). In conclusion, the specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test could be improved significantly by increasing the second cut-off from 1.93 to 5.0, without affecting the sensitivity of the test in a population-based screening setting.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4106783?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aniek Boers Lorian Slagter-Menkema Bettien M van Hemel Jerome L Belinson Teus Ruitenbeek Henk J Buikema Harry Klip Hilde Ghyssaert Ate G J van der Zee Geertruida H de Bock G Bea A Wisman Ed Schuuring |
spellingShingle |
Aniek Boers Lorian Slagter-Menkema Bettien M van Hemel Jerome L Belinson Teus Ruitenbeek Henk J Buikema Harry Klip Hilde Ghyssaert Ate G J van der Zee Geertruida H de Bock G Bea A Wisman Ed Schuuring Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Aniek Boers Lorian Slagter-Menkema Bettien M van Hemel Jerome L Belinson Teus Ruitenbeek Henk J Buikema Harry Klip Hilde Ghyssaert Ate G J van der Zee Geertruida H de Bock G Bea A Wisman Ed Schuuring |
author_sort |
Aniek Boers |
title |
Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off. |
title_short |
Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off. |
title_full |
Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off. |
title_fullStr |
Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off. |
title_sort |
comparing the cervista hpv hr test and hybrid capture 2 assay in a dutch screening population: improved specificity of the cervista hpv hr test by changing the cut-off. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
The diagnostic performance of the widely-used Cervista HPV HR test was compared to the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test in a Dutch population-based cervical cancer screening program. In 900 scrapings of women with normal cytomorphology, specificity was 90% (95%CI: 87.84-91.87) for the Cervista HPV HR test and 96% (95%CI: 94.76-97.37) for the HC2 test with 93% agreement between both tests (κ = 0.5, p<0.001). The sensitivity for CIN2+ using 65 scrapings of women with histological-confirmed CIN2+ was 91% (95%CI: 80.97-96.51) for the Cervista HPV HR test and 92% (95%CI: 82.94-97.43) for the HC2 test with 95% agreement between both tests (κ = 0.7, p<0.001). Fifty-seven of 60 HC2 negative/Cervista positive cases tested HPV-negative with PCR-based HPV assays; of these cases 56% were defined as Cervista triple-positive with FOZ values in all 3 mixes higher than the second cut-off of 1.93 (as set by manufacturer). By setting this cut-off at 5.0, specificity improved significantly without affecting sensitivity. External validation of this new cut-off at 5.0 in triple-positive scrapings of women selected from the SHENCCASTII database revealed that 22/24 histological normal cases now tested HPV-negative in the Cervista HPV HR test, while CIN2+ lesions remained HPV-positive. The intra-laboratory reproducibility of the Cervista HPV HR test (n = 510) showed a concordance of 92% and 93% for cut-off 1.93 and 5.0 (κ = 0.83 and κ = 0.84, p<0.001) and inter-laboratory agreement of the Cervista HPV HR test was 90% and 93% for cut-off 1.93 and 5.0 (κ = 0.80 and κ = 0.85, p<0.001). In conclusion, the specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test could be improved significantly by increasing the second cut-off from 1.93 to 5.0, without affecting the sensitivity of the test in a population-based screening setting. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4106783?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aniekboers comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff AT lorianslagtermenkema comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff AT bettienmvanhemel comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff AT jeromelbelinson comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff AT teusruitenbeek comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff AT henkjbuikema comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff AT harryklip comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff AT hildeghyssaert comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff AT ategjvanderzee comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff AT geertruidahdebock comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff AT gbeaawisman comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff AT edschuuring comparingthecervistahpvhrtestandhybridcapture2assayinadutchscreeningpopulationimprovedspecificityofthecervistahpvhrtestbychangingthecutoff |
_version_ |
1725818493046095872 |