Safety and efficacy of transitioning from the combination of bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

The combination of bosentan and sildenafil is commonly used to treat patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); however, there is evidence of a significant drug interaction between these two medications. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transitioning patients with PAH from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathan J. Verlinden, Raymond L. Benza, Amresh Raina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-12-01
Series:Pulmonary Circulation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2045894020945523
id doaj-0cab27788e5047cc8fe8b7a450e5f4d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0cab27788e5047cc8fe8b7a450e5f4d82020-12-11T02:03:35ZengSAGE PublishingPulmonary Circulation2045-89402020-12-011010.1177/2045894020945523Safety and efficacy of transitioning from the combination of bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertensionNathan J. Verlinden0Raymond L. Benza1Amresh Raina2Cardiovascular Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USADivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USACardiovascular Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USAThe combination of bosentan and sildenafil is commonly used to treat patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); however, there is evidence of a significant drug interaction between these two medications. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transitioning patients with PAH from the combination of bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy. A retrospective database review was performed on 16 patients with PAH who were treated with the combination of bosentan and sildenafil and transitioned to alternative treatment at our center. Invasive and non-invasive patient parameters were collected at baseline and after transition. 56.3% of patients were in World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC) III and a majority of patients (68.7%) were on background prostacyclin therapy. The most common reason for transition was concern for a drug interaction in seven patients (43.8%). The most common transition was bosentan to macitentan in eight patients (50%). Fifteen patients (93.8%) tolerated the transition after a median follow-up of 6.5 months with minor adverse events occurring in four patients (25%). In 11 patients, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) was unchanged comparing baseline to post transition measurements with a median change of +8 m (range: −50 to + 70; P = 0.39). Nine patients (81.8%) had stable (within 15% margin) or significant improvement (increase by ≥15%) in 6MWD after transition. All patients demonstrated stable or improved WHO FC after transition. There were no significant changes after transition in hemodynamics, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) values, or Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) risk scores. In our study, transitioning patients from bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy was safe and resulted in clinical stability.https://doi.org/10.1177/2045894020945523
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nathan J. Verlinden
Raymond L. Benza
Amresh Raina
spellingShingle Nathan J. Verlinden
Raymond L. Benza
Amresh Raina
Safety and efficacy of transitioning from the combination of bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
Pulmonary Circulation
author_facet Nathan J. Verlinden
Raymond L. Benza
Amresh Raina
author_sort Nathan J. Verlinden
title Safety and efficacy of transitioning from the combination of bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
title_short Safety and efficacy of transitioning from the combination of bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
title_full Safety and efficacy of transitioning from the combination of bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of transitioning from the combination of bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of transitioning from the combination of bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
title_sort safety and efficacy of transitioning from the combination of bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Pulmonary Circulation
issn 2045-8940
publishDate 2020-12-01
description The combination of bosentan and sildenafil is commonly used to treat patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); however, there is evidence of a significant drug interaction between these two medications. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transitioning patients with PAH from the combination of bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy. A retrospective database review was performed on 16 patients with PAH who were treated with the combination of bosentan and sildenafil and transitioned to alternative treatment at our center. Invasive and non-invasive patient parameters were collected at baseline and after transition. 56.3% of patients were in World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC) III and a majority of patients (68.7%) were on background prostacyclin therapy. The most common reason for transition was concern for a drug interaction in seven patients (43.8%). The most common transition was bosentan to macitentan in eight patients (50%). Fifteen patients (93.8%) tolerated the transition after a median follow-up of 6.5 months with minor adverse events occurring in four patients (25%). In 11 patients, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) was unchanged comparing baseline to post transition measurements with a median change of +8 m (range: −50 to + 70; P = 0.39). Nine patients (81.8%) had stable (within 15% margin) or significant improvement (increase by ≥15%) in 6MWD after transition. All patients demonstrated stable or improved WHO FC after transition. There were no significant changes after transition in hemodynamics, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) values, or Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) risk scores. In our study, transitioning patients from bosentan and sildenafil to alternative therapy was safe and resulted in clinical stability.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2045894020945523
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanjverlinden safetyandefficacyoftransitioningfromthecombinationofbosentanandsildenafiltoalternativetherapyinpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertension
AT raymondlbenza safetyandefficacyoftransitioningfromthecombinationofbosentanandsildenafiltoalternativetherapyinpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertension
AT amreshraina safetyandefficacyoftransitioningfromthecombinationofbosentanandsildenafiltoalternativetherapyinpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertension
_version_ 1724386868543356928