Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.

Mutational (genetic) robustness is phenotypic constancy in the face of mutational changes to the genome. Robustness is critical to the understanding of evolution because phenotypically expressed genetic variation is the fuel of natural selection. Nonetheless, the evidence for adaptive evolution of m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca Montville, Remy Froissart, Susanna K Remold, Olivier Tenaillon, Paul E Turner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2005-11-01
Series:PLoS Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1275523?pdf=render
id doaj-0cb65786ea014f2fb2e40536c44a6141
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0cb65786ea014f2fb2e40536c44a61412021-07-02T04:00:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Biology1544-91731545-78852005-11-01311e38110.1371/journal.pbio.0030381Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.Rebecca MontvilleRemy FroissartSusanna K RemoldOlivier TenaillonPaul E TurnerMutational (genetic) robustness is phenotypic constancy in the face of mutational changes to the genome. Robustness is critical to the understanding of evolution because phenotypically expressed genetic variation is the fuel of natural selection. Nonetheless, the evidence for adaptive evolution of mutational robustness in biological populations is controversial. Robustness should be selectively favored when mutation rates are high, a common feature of RNA viruses. However, selection for robustness may be relaxed under virus co-infection because complementation between virus genotypes can buffer mutational effects. We therefore hypothesized that selection for genetic robustness in viruses will be weakened with increasing frequency of co-infection. To test this idea, we used populations of RNA phage phi6 that were experimentally evolved at low and high levels of co-infection and subjected lineages of these viruses to mutation accumulation through population bottlenecking. The data demonstrate that viruses evolved under high co-infection show relatively greater mean magnitude and variance in the fitness changes generated by addition of random mutations, confirming our hypothesis that they experience weakened selection for robustness. Our study further suggests that co-infection of host cells may be advantageous to RNA viruses only in the short term. In addition, we observed higher mutation frequencies in the more robust viruses, indicating that evolution of robustness might foster less-accurate genome replication in RNA viruses.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1275523?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rebecca Montville
Remy Froissart
Susanna K Remold
Olivier Tenaillon
Paul E Turner
spellingShingle Rebecca Montville
Remy Froissart
Susanna K Remold
Olivier Tenaillon
Paul E Turner
Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.
PLoS Biology
author_facet Rebecca Montville
Remy Froissart
Susanna K Remold
Olivier Tenaillon
Paul E Turner
author_sort Rebecca Montville
title Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.
title_short Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.
title_full Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.
title_fullStr Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.
title_sort evolution of mutational robustness in an rna virus.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Biology
issn 1544-9173
1545-7885
publishDate 2005-11-01
description Mutational (genetic) robustness is phenotypic constancy in the face of mutational changes to the genome. Robustness is critical to the understanding of evolution because phenotypically expressed genetic variation is the fuel of natural selection. Nonetheless, the evidence for adaptive evolution of mutational robustness in biological populations is controversial. Robustness should be selectively favored when mutation rates are high, a common feature of RNA viruses. However, selection for robustness may be relaxed under virus co-infection because complementation between virus genotypes can buffer mutational effects. We therefore hypothesized that selection for genetic robustness in viruses will be weakened with increasing frequency of co-infection. To test this idea, we used populations of RNA phage phi6 that were experimentally evolved at low and high levels of co-infection and subjected lineages of these viruses to mutation accumulation through population bottlenecking. The data demonstrate that viruses evolved under high co-infection show relatively greater mean magnitude and variance in the fitness changes generated by addition of random mutations, confirming our hypothesis that they experience weakened selection for robustness. Our study further suggests that co-infection of host cells may be advantageous to RNA viruses only in the short term. In addition, we observed higher mutation frequencies in the more robust viruses, indicating that evolution of robustness might foster less-accurate genome replication in RNA viruses.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1275523?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccamontville evolutionofmutationalrobustnessinanrnavirus
AT remyfroissart evolutionofmutationalrobustnessinanrnavirus
AT susannakremold evolutionofmutationalrobustnessinanrnavirus
AT oliviertenaillon evolutionofmutationalrobustnessinanrnavirus
AT pauleturner evolutionofmutationalrobustnessinanrnavirus
_version_ 1721340752684908544