The Paradox of Ipseity and Difference: Derrida's Deconstruction and Logocentrism

In thinking of Derrida's notion of deconstruction as an attitude in understanding logocentrism, one might find it necessary to pre-empt this discourse by taking into serious consideration three words: center, consciousness, and difference. These words offer the key towards the problem of logoce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roland Theuas S. Pada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Santo Tomas 2007-06-01
Series:Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.kritike.org/journal/issue_1/pada_june2007.pdf
id doaj-0cbd37ca616240f796b82a8852148d8e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0cbd37ca616240f796b82a8852148d8e2020-11-24T22:55:09ZengUniversity of Santo TomasKritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy1908-73302007-06-01113251The Paradox of Ipseity and Difference: Derrida's Deconstruction and LogocentrismRoland Theuas S. PadaIn thinking of Derrida's notion of deconstruction as an attitude in understanding logocentrism, one might find it necessary to pre-empt this discourse by taking into serious consideration three words: center, consciousness, and difference. These words offer the key towards the problem of logocentrism within Derrida's deconstruction and, as far as these words seem to contextualize themselves within Derrida's texts, they also offer an explanation of how meaning becomes possible. Derrida's deconstruction is a form of writing in which the "I-ness" of the self is given emphasis as both the limitation and possibility of appropriation in so far as context is concerned. Reading for him is already considered as an act of writing, the text, being polysemic in its inscription, already implies that the repetition of the syntax of words will always be rendered by the consciousness with a relative amount of impurity. Every instance of reading then is a form of writing, each time an Other tries to read the singularity of the construction of the text, it is already altered as another occurrence within another consciousness.http://www.kritike.org/journal/issue_1/pada_june2007.pdfJacques Derridalogocentrismdeconstruction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roland Theuas S. Pada
spellingShingle Roland Theuas S. Pada
The Paradox of Ipseity and Difference: Derrida's Deconstruction and Logocentrism
Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy
Jacques Derrida
logocentrism
deconstruction
author_facet Roland Theuas S. Pada
author_sort Roland Theuas S. Pada
title The Paradox of Ipseity and Difference: Derrida's Deconstruction and Logocentrism
title_short The Paradox of Ipseity and Difference: Derrida's Deconstruction and Logocentrism
title_full The Paradox of Ipseity and Difference: Derrida's Deconstruction and Logocentrism
title_fullStr The Paradox of Ipseity and Difference: Derrida's Deconstruction and Logocentrism
title_full_unstemmed The Paradox of Ipseity and Difference: Derrida's Deconstruction and Logocentrism
title_sort paradox of ipseity and difference: derrida's deconstruction and logocentrism
publisher University of Santo Tomas
series Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy
issn 1908-7330
publishDate 2007-06-01
description In thinking of Derrida's notion of deconstruction as an attitude in understanding logocentrism, one might find it necessary to pre-empt this discourse by taking into serious consideration three words: center, consciousness, and difference. These words offer the key towards the problem of logocentrism within Derrida's deconstruction and, as far as these words seem to contextualize themselves within Derrida's texts, they also offer an explanation of how meaning becomes possible. Derrida's deconstruction is a form of writing in which the "I-ness" of the self is given emphasis as both the limitation and possibility of appropriation in so far as context is concerned. Reading for him is already considered as an act of writing, the text, being polysemic in its inscription, already implies that the repetition of the syntax of words will always be rendered by the consciousness with a relative amount of impurity. Every instance of reading then is a form of writing, each time an Other tries to read the singularity of the construction of the text, it is already altered as another occurrence within another consciousness.
topic Jacques Derrida
logocentrism
deconstruction
url http://www.kritike.org/journal/issue_1/pada_june2007.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rolandtheuasspada theparadoxofipseityanddifferencederridasdeconstructionandlogocentrism
AT rolandtheuasspada paradoxofipseityanddifferencederridasdeconstructionandlogocentrism
_version_ 1725657662585044992