Some problems and errors in cytogenetic biodosimetry

Human radiosensitivity is a quantitative trait that is generally subject to binomial distribution. Individual radiosensitivity, however, may deviate significantly from the mean (by 2–3 standard deviations). Thus, the same dose of radiation may result in different levels of genotoxic damage (commonly...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irma Mosse, Alexander Kilchevsky, Nevena Nikolova, Nikolai Zhelev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-05-01
Series:Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1259018
id doaj-0cc0b03253014198a742cfa18aa2749e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0cc0b03253014198a742cfa18aa2749e2020-11-25T02:07:55ZengTaylor & Francis GroupBiotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment1310-28181314-35302017-05-0131346046810.1080/13102818.2016.12590181259018Some problems and errors in cytogenetic biodosimetryIrma Mosse0Alexander Kilchevsky1Nevena Nikolova2Nikolai Zhelev3Institute of Genetics and CytologyInstitute of Genetics and CytologyTrakia UniversityAbertay UniversityHuman radiosensitivity is a quantitative trait that is generally subject to binomial distribution. Individual radiosensitivity, however, may deviate significantly from the mean (by 2–3 standard deviations). Thus, the same dose of radiation may result in different levels of genotoxic damage (commonly measured as chromosome aberration rates) in different individuals. There is significant genetic component in individual radiosensitivity. It is related to carriership of variant alleles of various single-nucleotide polymorphisms (most of these in genes coding for proteins functioning in DNA damage identification and repair); carriership of a different number of alleles producing cumulative effects; amplification of gene copies coding for proteins responsible for radioresistance, mobile genetic elements and others. Among the other factors influencing individual radioresistance are: the radioadaptive response; the bystander effect; the levels of endogenous substances with radioprotective and antimutagenic properties and environmental factors such as lifestyle and diet, physical activity, psychoemotional state, hormonal state, certain drugs, infections and others. These factors may have radioprotective or sensibilizing effects. Apparently, there are too many factors that may significantly modulate the biological effects of ionizing radiation. Thus, conventional methodologies for biodosimetry (specifically, cytogenetic methods) may produce significant errors if personal traits that may affect radioresistance are not accounted for.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1259018Biodosimetry errorsradiosensitivitygenetic variationenvironmental factors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Irma Mosse
Alexander Kilchevsky
Nevena Nikolova
Nikolai Zhelev
spellingShingle Irma Mosse
Alexander Kilchevsky
Nevena Nikolova
Nikolai Zhelev
Some problems and errors in cytogenetic biodosimetry
Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
Biodosimetry errors
radiosensitivity
genetic variation
environmental factors
author_facet Irma Mosse
Alexander Kilchevsky
Nevena Nikolova
Nikolai Zhelev
author_sort Irma Mosse
title Some problems and errors in cytogenetic biodosimetry
title_short Some problems and errors in cytogenetic biodosimetry
title_full Some problems and errors in cytogenetic biodosimetry
title_fullStr Some problems and errors in cytogenetic biodosimetry
title_full_unstemmed Some problems and errors in cytogenetic biodosimetry
title_sort some problems and errors in cytogenetic biodosimetry
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
issn 1310-2818
1314-3530
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Human radiosensitivity is a quantitative trait that is generally subject to binomial distribution. Individual radiosensitivity, however, may deviate significantly from the mean (by 2–3 standard deviations). Thus, the same dose of radiation may result in different levels of genotoxic damage (commonly measured as chromosome aberration rates) in different individuals. There is significant genetic component in individual radiosensitivity. It is related to carriership of variant alleles of various single-nucleotide polymorphisms (most of these in genes coding for proteins functioning in DNA damage identification and repair); carriership of a different number of alleles producing cumulative effects; amplification of gene copies coding for proteins responsible for radioresistance, mobile genetic elements and others. Among the other factors influencing individual radioresistance are: the radioadaptive response; the bystander effect; the levels of endogenous substances with radioprotective and antimutagenic properties and environmental factors such as lifestyle and diet, physical activity, psychoemotional state, hormonal state, certain drugs, infections and others. These factors may have radioprotective or sensibilizing effects. Apparently, there are too many factors that may significantly modulate the biological effects of ionizing radiation. Thus, conventional methodologies for biodosimetry (specifically, cytogenetic methods) may produce significant errors if personal traits that may affect radioresistance are not accounted for.
topic Biodosimetry errors
radiosensitivity
genetic variation
environmental factors
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1259018
work_keys_str_mv AT irmamosse someproblemsanderrorsincytogeneticbiodosimetry
AT alexanderkilchevsky someproblemsanderrorsincytogeneticbiodosimetry
AT nevenanikolova someproblemsanderrorsincytogeneticbiodosimetry
AT nikolaizhelev someproblemsanderrorsincytogeneticbiodosimetry
_version_ 1724928786982502400