Relative age effects in Elite Chinese soccer players: Implications of the 'one-child' policy.

The relative age effect (RAE) refers to the asymmetrical distribution of birthdates in a cohort found in many achievement domains, particularly in sports with many participants like soccer. Given the uniqueness of the one-child policy in China, this study examined the existence of the RAE in elite C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhen Li, Lijuan Mao, Christina Steingröver, Nick Wattie, Joseph Baker, Jörg Schorer, Werner F Helsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228611
id doaj-0cdd87cade4646a280dfb2a9100ef9c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0cdd87cade4646a280dfb2a9100ef9c22021-03-03T21:28:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01152e022861110.1371/journal.pone.0228611Relative age effects in Elite Chinese soccer players: Implications of the 'one-child' policy.Zhen LiLijuan MaoChristina SteingröverNick WattieJoseph BakerJörg SchorerWerner F HelsenThe relative age effect (RAE) refers to the asymmetrical distribution of birthdates in a cohort found in many achievement domains, particularly in sports with many participants like soccer. Given the uniqueness of the one-child policy in China, this study examined the existence of the RAE in elite Chinese male and female soccer players generally and relative to their playing position on the field. Results showed a clear and obvious RAE for all age groups (U20 male, U18 male, adult female and U18 female) with the observed birthdate distributions for each age group significantly different from expected distributions (p<0.05). Additionally, we noticed a differential RAE according to the players' position on the field as reflected in different effect sizes. In male players, the RAE was significantly greater in Defenders (DF) and Goalkeepers (GK) compared to Midfielders (MF) and Forwards (FW) (VDF = 0.266>VGK = 0.215>VMF = 0.178>VFW = 0.175). In female players, GKs had a larger RAE (VGK = 0.184>0.17, VDF = 0.143, VMF = 0.127, VFW = 0.116). To reduce the negative consequences associated with RAEs throughout player development systems, potential solutions are discussed.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228611
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhen Li
Lijuan Mao
Christina Steingröver
Nick Wattie
Joseph Baker
Jörg Schorer
Werner F Helsen
spellingShingle Zhen Li
Lijuan Mao
Christina Steingröver
Nick Wattie
Joseph Baker
Jörg Schorer
Werner F Helsen
Relative age effects in Elite Chinese soccer players: Implications of the 'one-child' policy.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Zhen Li
Lijuan Mao
Christina Steingröver
Nick Wattie
Joseph Baker
Jörg Schorer
Werner F Helsen
author_sort Zhen Li
title Relative age effects in Elite Chinese soccer players: Implications of the 'one-child' policy.
title_short Relative age effects in Elite Chinese soccer players: Implications of the 'one-child' policy.
title_full Relative age effects in Elite Chinese soccer players: Implications of the 'one-child' policy.
title_fullStr Relative age effects in Elite Chinese soccer players: Implications of the 'one-child' policy.
title_full_unstemmed Relative age effects in Elite Chinese soccer players: Implications of the 'one-child' policy.
title_sort relative age effects in elite chinese soccer players: implications of the 'one-child' policy.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The relative age effect (RAE) refers to the asymmetrical distribution of birthdates in a cohort found in many achievement domains, particularly in sports with many participants like soccer. Given the uniqueness of the one-child policy in China, this study examined the existence of the RAE in elite Chinese male and female soccer players generally and relative to their playing position on the field. Results showed a clear and obvious RAE for all age groups (U20 male, U18 male, adult female and U18 female) with the observed birthdate distributions for each age group significantly different from expected distributions (p<0.05). Additionally, we noticed a differential RAE according to the players' position on the field as reflected in different effect sizes. In male players, the RAE was significantly greater in Defenders (DF) and Goalkeepers (GK) compared to Midfielders (MF) and Forwards (FW) (VDF = 0.266>VGK = 0.215>VMF = 0.178>VFW = 0.175). In female players, GKs had a larger RAE (VGK = 0.184>0.17, VDF = 0.143, VMF = 0.127, VFW = 0.116). To reduce the negative consequences associated with RAEs throughout player development systems, potential solutions are discussed.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228611
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenli relativeageeffectsinelitechinesesoccerplayersimplicationsoftheonechildpolicy
AT lijuanmao relativeageeffectsinelitechinesesoccerplayersimplicationsoftheonechildpolicy
AT christinasteingrover relativeageeffectsinelitechinesesoccerplayersimplicationsoftheonechildpolicy
AT nickwattie relativeageeffectsinelitechinesesoccerplayersimplicationsoftheonechildpolicy
AT josephbaker relativeageeffectsinelitechinesesoccerplayersimplicationsoftheonechildpolicy
AT jorgschorer relativeageeffectsinelitechinesesoccerplayersimplicationsoftheonechildpolicy
AT wernerfhelsen relativeageeffectsinelitechinesesoccerplayersimplicationsoftheonechildpolicy
_version_ 1714816577833009152