The Relations Among Threatened Species, Their Protection, and Taboos

We analyzed the role of taboos for the protection of species listed as "threatened" by the World Conservation Union (IUCN), and also for species known to be endemic and keystone. The study was limited to taboos that totally avoid or prohibit any use of particular species and their populati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johan Colding, Carl Folke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 1997-06-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol1/iss1/art6/
id doaj-0ce0a123c57e45ec80946bae3b7f24ad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ce0a123c57e45ec80946bae3b7f24ad2020-11-24T23:24:48ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30871997-06-0111610.5751/ES-00018-01010618The Relations Among Threatened Species, Their Protection, and TaboosJohan Colding0Carl Folke1Stockholm University and Royal Swedish Academy of SciencesStockholm UniversityWe analyzed the role of taboos for the protection of species listed as "threatened" by the World Conservation Union (IUCN), and also for species known to be endemic and keystone. The study was limited to taboos that totally avoid or prohibit any use of particular species and their populations. We call them specific-species taboos . Through a literature review, 70 currently existing examples of specific-species taboos were identified and analyzed. The species avoided were grouped into biological classes. Threat categories were determined for each species, based on the IUCN Red Data Book. We found that ~ 30% of the identified taboos prohibit any use of species listed as threatened by IUCN. Of the specific-species taboos, 60% are set on reptiles and mammals. In these two classes, ~ 50% of the species are threatened, representing all of the threatened species in our analysis, with the exception of one bird species. Both endemic and keystone species that are important for ecosystem functions are avoided by specific-species taboos. Specific-species taboos have important ecological ramifications for the protection of threatened and ecologically important populations of species. We do not suggest that specific-species taboos are placed on species because they are, or have been, endangered; instead, we emphasize that species are avoided for a variety of other reasons. It is urgent to identify and analyze resource practices and social mechanisms of traditional societies, such as taboos, and to investigate their possible ecological significance. Although it may provide insights of value for conservation, not only of species, but also of ecosystem processes and functions, such information is being lost rapidly.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol1/iss1/art6/endemic specieskeystone speciesnature conservationtaboosthreatened speciestraditional societies.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Johan Colding
Carl Folke
spellingShingle Johan Colding
Carl Folke
The Relations Among Threatened Species, Their Protection, and Taboos
Ecology and Society
endemic species
keystone species
nature conservation
taboos
threatened species
traditional societies.
author_facet Johan Colding
Carl Folke
author_sort Johan Colding
title The Relations Among Threatened Species, Their Protection, and Taboos
title_short The Relations Among Threatened Species, Their Protection, and Taboos
title_full The Relations Among Threatened Species, Their Protection, and Taboos
title_fullStr The Relations Among Threatened Species, Their Protection, and Taboos
title_full_unstemmed The Relations Among Threatened Species, Their Protection, and Taboos
title_sort relations among threatened species, their protection, and taboos
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 1997-06-01
description We analyzed the role of taboos for the protection of species listed as "threatened" by the World Conservation Union (IUCN), and also for species known to be endemic and keystone. The study was limited to taboos that totally avoid or prohibit any use of particular species and their populations. We call them specific-species taboos . Through a literature review, 70 currently existing examples of specific-species taboos were identified and analyzed. The species avoided were grouped into biological classes. Threat categories were determined for each species, based on the IUCN Red Data Book. We found that ~ 30% of the identified taboos prohibit any use of species listed as threatened by IUCN. Of the specific-species taboos, 60% are set on reptiles and mammals. In these two classes, ~ 50% of the species are threatened, representing all of the threatened species in our analysis, with the exception of one bird species. Both endemic and keystone species that are important for ecosystem functions are avoided by specific-species taboos. Specific-species taboos have important ecological ramifications for the protection of threatened and ecologically important populations of species. We do not suggest that specific-species taboos are placed on species because they are, or have been, endangered; instead, we emphasize that species are avoided for a variety of other reasons. It is urgent to identify and analyze resource practices and social mechanisms of traditional societies, such as taboos, and to investigate their possible ecological significance. Although it may provide insights of value for conservation, not only of species, but also of ecosystem processes and functions, such information is being lost rapidly.
topic endemic species
keystone species
nature conservation
taboos
threatened species
traditional societies.
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol1/iss1/art6/
work_keys_str_mv AT johancolding therelationsamongthreatenedspeciestheirprotectionandtaboos
AT carlfolke therelationsamongthreatenedspeciestheirprotectionandtaboos
AT johancolding relationsamongthreatenedspeciestheirprotectionandtaboos
AT carlfolke relationsamongthreatenedspeciestheirprotectionandtaboos
_version_ 1716320124393226240