Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes

Background and purpose — Revision surgery after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty is sometimes required. Varying revision rates and outcomes have been reported in rather small patient series. Data on risk factors for revision surgery, on the final outcome of revision, and possible factors affecting th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simo Mattila, Eero Waris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-07-01
Series:Acta Orthopaedica
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1599253
id doaj-0cfbf78c5c2b404aa56cb0e81db6662b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0cfbf78c5c2b404aa56cb0e81db6662b2021-02-02T06:16:45ZengTaylor & Francis GroupActa Orthopaedica1745-36741745-36822019-07-0190438939310.1080/17453674.2019.15992531599253Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomesSimo Mattila0Eero Waris1Helsinki University Central HospitalHelsinki University Central HospitalBackground and purpose — Revision surgery after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty is sometimes required. Varying revision rates and outcomes have been reported in rather small patient series. Data on risk factors for revision surgery, on the final outcome of revision, and possible factors affecting the outcome of revision are also limited. We evaluated these factors in 50 patients. Patients and methods — From 1,142 trapeziometacarpal arthroplasties performed during a 10-year period, 50 patients with 65 revision surgeries were retrospectively identified and invited to participate in a follow-up study involving subjective, objective, and radiologic evaluation. The revision rate, risk factors for revision, and factors affecting the outcome of revision were analyzed. Results — The revision rate was 5%. Scaphometacarpal impingement was the most common reason for revision surgery. Patient age ≤ 55 years was a risk factor with a revision rate of 9% in this age group, whereas an operation on both thumbs during the follow-up period was a negative risk factor for revision surgery. There was no difference in revision risk between ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition with or without a bone tunnel. 9 patients had multiple revision procedures and their final outcome did not differ significantly from patients revised only once. Most of the patients felt subjectively that they had benefited from revision surgery and the subjective outcome measures (QuickDash and pain VAS) and the Conolly score were in the same range as previously described for revision trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. Interpretation — Age ≤ 55 years is a risk factor for revision surgery. The type of primary surgery does not affect the risk of revision surgery and multiple revision procedures do not result in worse outcomes than cases revised only once. Mechanical pain caused by contact between the metacarpal and scaphoid is the most common indication for revision surgery. In general, patients seem to benefit from revision surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1599253
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Simo Mattila
Eero Waris
spellingShingle Simo Mattila
Eero Waris
Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
Acta Orthopaedica
author_facet Simo Mattila
Eero Waris
author_sort Simo Mattila
title Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
title_short Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
title_full Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
title_fullStr Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
title_sort revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Acta Orthopaedica
issn 1745-3674
1745-3682
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Background and purpose — Revision surgery after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty is sometimes required. Varying revision rates and outcomes have been reported in rather small patient series. Data on risk factors for revision surgery, on the final outcome of revision, and possible factors affecting the outcome of revision are also limited. We evaluated these factors in 50 patients. Patients and methods — From 1,142 trapeziometacarpal arthroplasties performed during a 10-year period, 50 patients with 65 revision surgeries were retrospectively identified and invited to participate in a follow-up study involving subjective, objective, and radiologic evaluation. The revision rate, risk factors for revision, and factors affecting the outcome of revision were analyzed. Results — The revision rate was 5%. Scaphometacarpal impingement was the most common reason for revision surgery. Patient age ≤ 55 years was a risk factor with a revision rate of 9% in this age group, whereas an operation on both thumbs during the follow-up period was a negative risk factor for revision surgery. There was no difference in revision risk between ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition with or without a bone tunnel. 9 patients had multiple revision procedures and their final outcome did not differ significantly from patients revised only once. Most of the patients felt subjectively that they had benefited from revision surgery and the subjective outcome measures (QuickDash and pain VAS) and the Conolly score were in the same range as previously described for revision trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. Interpretation — Age ≤ 55 years is a risk factor for revision surgery. The type of primary surgery does not affect the risk of revision surgery and multiple revision procedures do not result in worse outcomes than cases revised only once. Mechanical pain caused by contact between the metacarpal and scaphoid is the most common indication for revision surgery. In general, patients seem to benefit from revision surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1599253
work_keys_str_mv AT simomattila revisionoftrapeziometacarpalarthroplastyriskfactorsproceduresandoutcomes
AT eerowaris revisionoftrapeziometacarpalarthroplastyriskfactorsproceduresandoutcomes
_version_ 1724301589233008640