The Neural Basis of Deception in Strategic Interactions

Communication based on informational asymmetries abounds in politics, business, and almost any other form of social interaction. Informational asymmetries may create incentives for the better-informed party to exploit her advantage by misrepresenting information. Using a game-theoretic setting, we i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kirsten G Volz, Kai eVogeley, Marc eTittgemeyer, D Yves eVon Cramon, Matthias eSutter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00027/full
id doaj-0d3ed1a0c1ea48718f6880cb93976212
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0d3ed1a0c1ea48718f6880cb939762122020-11-25T00:23:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532015-02-01910.3389/fnbeh.2015.00027120916The Neural Basis of Deception in Strategic InteractionsKirsten G Volz0Kai eVogeley1Marc eTittgemeyer2D Yves eVon Cramon3Matthias eSutter4Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience (CIN)University Hospital CologneMax Planck Institute for Metabolism ResearchMax Planck Institute for Metabolism ResearchUniversity of InnsbruckCommunication based on informational asymmetries abounds in politics, business, and almost any other form of social interaction. Informational asymmetries may create incentives for the better-informed party to exploit her advantage by misrepresenting information. Using a game-theoretic setting, we investigate the neural basis of deception in human interaction. Unlike in most previous fMRI research on deception, the participants decide themselves whether to lie or not. We find activation within the right temporo-parietal junction (rTPJ), the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), the (pre)cuneus (CUN), and the anterior frontal gyrus (aFG) when contrasting lying with truth telling. Notably, our design also allows for an investigation of the neural foundations of sophisticated deception through telling the truth—when the sender does not expect the receiver to believe her (true) message. Sophisticated deception triggers activation within the same network as plain lies, i.e., we find activity within the rTPJ, the CUN, and aFG. We take this result to show that brain activation can reveal the sender’s veridical intention to deceive others, irrespective of whether in fact the sender utters the factual truth or not.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00027/fullHabenuladeceptionfMRIexperimenttemporo-parietal junctionStrategic interactions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kirsten G Volz
Kai eVogeley
Marc eTittgemeyer
D Yves eVon Cramon
Matthias eSutter
spellingShingle Kirsten G Volz
Kai eVogeley
Marc eTittgemeyer
D Yves eVon Cramon
Matthias eSutter
The Neural Basis of Deception in Strategic Interactions
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Habenula
deception
fMRI
experiment
temporo-parietal junction
Strategic interactions
author_facet Kirsten G Volz
Kai eVogeley
Marc eTittgemeyer
D Yves eVon Cramon
Matthias eSutter
author_sort Kirsten G Volz
title The Neural Basis of Deception in Strategic Interactions
title_short The Neural Basis of Deception in Strategic Interactions
title_full The Neural Basis of Deception in Strategic Interactions
title_fullStr The Neural Basis of Deception in Strategic Interactions
title_full_unstemmed The Neural Basis of Deception in Strategic Interactions
title_sort neural basis of deception in strategic interactions
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
issn 1662-5153
publishDate 2015-02-01
description Communication based on informational asymmetries abounds in politics, business, and almost any other form of social interaction. Informational asymmetries may create incentives for the better-informed party to exploit her advantage by misrepresenting information. Using a game-theoretic setting, we investigate the neural basis of deception in human interaction. Unlike in most previous fMRI research on deception, the participants decide themselves whether to lie or not. We find activation within the right temporo-parietal junction (rTPJ), the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), the (pre)cuneus (CUN), and the anterior frontal gyrus (aFG) when contrasting lying with truth telling. Notably, our design also allows for an investigation of the neural foundations of sophisticated deception through telling the truth—when the sender does not expect the receiver to believe her (true) message. Sophisticated deception triggers activation within the same network as plain lies, i.e., we find activity within the rTPJ, the CUN, and aFG. We take this result to show that brain activation can reveal the sender’s veridical intention to deceive others, irrespective of whether in fact the sender utters the factual truth or not.
topic Habenula
deception
fMRI
experiment
temporo-parietal junction
Strategic interactions
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00027/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kirstengvolz theneuralbasisofdeceptioninstrategicinteractions
AT kaievogeley theneuralbasisofdeceptioninstrategicinteractions
AT marcetittgemeyer theneuralbasisofdeceptioninstrategicinteractions
AT dyvesevoncramon theneuralbasisofdeceptioninstrategicinteractions
AT matthiasesutter theneuralbasisofdeceptioninstrategicinteractions
AT kirstengvolz neuralbasisofdeceptioninstrategicinteractions
AT kaievogeley neuralbasisofdeceptioninstrategicinteractions
AT marcetittgemeyer neuralbasisofdeceptioninstrategicinteractions
AT dyvesevoncramon neuralbasisofdeceptioninstrategicinteractions
AT matthiasesutter neuralbasisofdeceptioninstrategicinteractions
_version_ 1725356651270111232