The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020

Objective. To compare the time-to-reimbursement of the last two committees of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), respectively appointed in 2015 and in 2018. Methods. The analysis was run through a specific internal database created by MA-Provider. The database was populated with information rega...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paola Raimondo, Giorgio Casilli, Martina Isernia, Dario Lidonnici, Roberto Ravasio, Virginia Ronco, Elena Lanati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AboutScience Srl 2020-12-01
Series:Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/view/2173
id doaj-0d671fd5e42c497699b0c210bde4fdf5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0d671fd5e42c497699b0c210bde4fdf52021-02-03T08:08:45ZengAboutScience SrlGlobal & Regional Health Technology Assessment2284-24032283-57332020-12-017110.33393/grhta.2020.2173The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020Paola Raimondo0Giorgio Casilli1Martina Isernia2Dario Lidonnici3Roberto Ravasio4Virginia Ronco5Elena Lanati6Market Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaMarket Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaMarket Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaMarket Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaMarket Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaMarket Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaMarket Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaObjective. To compare the time-to-reimbursement of the last two committees of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), respectively appointed in 2015 and in 2018. Methods. The analysis was run through a specific internal database created by MA-Provider. The database was populated with information regarding European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved new drugs, including each step of the Italian Price and Reimbursement (P&R) process reported in the monthly outcomes of Technical Scientific Committee (CTS) and Price and Reimbursement Committee (CPR) meetings from September 2015 to April 2020. Results. The 2015 and the 2018 committees have reimbursed respectively 39 and 28 drugs by comparing their initial 19 months of activity. Significant differences have been observed in negotiated economic conditions, in particular an increase in the number of drugs with confidential discount (2018-committee: 96.4% vs 2015-committee: 64.1%; p = 0.003) and a reduction in the application of Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs) (2018-committee: 10.7% vs 2015-committee: 33.3%; p = 0.036). The average duration of the P&R procedure managed by the 2018-committee has increased by 45 days compared to the 2015-committee (287 days vs 242 days; p = 0.071) and this trend of delay is associated to the active scientific/economic assessment phase by CTS and CPR (particularly by the latter) and not to administrative phases (e.g. Official Journal publications). Conclusions. The observed differences between committees may be explained by the higher number of oncological and/or innovative drugs assessed by the 2018-committee (regarding the time delay, probably linked to greater difficulties in finding a win-win agreement able to satisfy both AIFA and Pharmaceutical Company). https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/view/2173AIFADrug accessPrice and ReimbursementTime-to-reimbursement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paola Raimondo
Giorgio Casilli
Martina Isernia
Dario Lidonnici
Roberto Ravasio
Virginia Ronco
Elena Lanati
spellingShingle Paola Raimondo
Giorgio Casilli
Martina Isernia
Dario Lidonnici
Roberto Ravasio
Virginia Ronco
Elena Lanati
The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
AIFA
Drug access
Price and Reimbursement
Time-to-reimbursement
author_facet Paola Raimondo
Giorgio Casilli
Martina Isernia
Dario Lidonnici
Roberto Ravasio
Virginia Ronco
Elena Lanati
author_sort Paola Raimondo
title The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020
title_short The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020
title_full The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020
title_fullStr The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020
title_full_unstemmed The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020
title_sort aifa time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020
publisher AboutScience Srl
series Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
issn 2284-2403
2283-5733
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Objective. To compare the time-to-reimbursement of the last two committees of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), respectively appointed in 2015 and in 2018. Methods. The analysis was run through a specific internal database created by MA-Provider. The database was populated with information regarding European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved new drugs, including each step of the Italian Price and Reimbursement (P&R) process reported in the monthly outcomes of Technical Scientific Committee (CTS) and Price and Reimbursement Committee (CPR) meetings from September 2015 to April 2020. Results. The 2015 and the 2018 committees have reimbursed respectively 39 and 28 drugs by comparing their initial 19 months of activity. Significant differences have been observed in negotiated economic conditions, in particular an increase in the number of drugs with confidential discount (2018-committee: 96.4% vs 2015-committee: 64.1%; p = 0.003) and a reduction in the application of Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs) (2018-committee: 10.7% vs 2015-committee: 33.3%; p = 0.036). The average duration of the P&R procedure managed by the 2018-committee has increased by 45 days compared to the 2015-committee (287 days vs 242 days; p = 0.071) and this trend of delay is associated to the active scientific/economic assessment phase by CTS and CPR (particularly by the latter) and not to administrative phases (e.g. Official Journal publications). Conclusions. The observed differences between committees may be explained by the higher number of oncological and/or innovative drugs assessed by the 2018-committee (regarding the time delay, probably linked to greater difficulties in finding a win-win agreement able to satisfy both AIFA and Pharmaceutical Company).
topic AIFA
Drug access
Price and Reimbursement
Time-to-reimbursement
url https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/view/2173
work_keys_str_mv AT paolaraimondo theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT giorgiocasilli theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT martinaisernia theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT dariolidonnici theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT robertoravasio theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT virginiaronco theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT elenalanati theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT paolaraimondo aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT giorgiocasilli aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT martinaisernia aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT dariolidonnici aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT robertoravasio aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT virginiaronco aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
AT elenalanati aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020
_version_ 1724288118515826688