The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020
Objective. To compare the time-to-reimbursement of the last two committees of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), respectively appointed in 2015 and in 2018. Methods. The analysis was run through a specific internal database created by MA-Provider. The database was populated with information rega...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AboutScience Srl
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/view/2173 |
id |
doaj-0d671fd5e42c497699b0c210bde4fdf5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0d671fd5e42c497699b0c210bde4fdf52021-02-03T08:08:45ZengAboutScience SrlGlobal & Regional Health Technology Assessment2284-24032283-57332020-12-017110.33393/grhta.2020.2173The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020Paola Raimondo0Giorgio Casilli1Martina Isernia2Dario Lidonnici3Roberto Ravasio4Virginia Ronco5Elena Lanati6Market Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaMarket Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaMarket Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaMarket Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaMarket Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaMarket Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaMarket Access Provider, Milano - ItaliaObjective. To compare the time-to-reimbursement of the last two committees of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), respectively appointed in 2015 and in 2018. Methods. The analysis was run through a specific internal database created by MA-Provider. The database was populated with information regarding European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved new drugs, including each step of the Italian Price and Reimbursement (P&R) process reported in the monthly outcomes of Technical Scientific Committee (CTS) and Price and Reimbursement Committee (CPR) meetings from September 2015 to April 2020. Results. The 2015 and the 2018 committees have reimbursed respectively 39 and 28 drugs by comparing their initial 19 months of activity. Significant differences have been observed in negotiated economic conditions, in particular an increase in the number of drugs with confidential discount (2018-committee: 96.4% vs 2015-committee: 64.1%; p = 0.003) and a reduction in the application of Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs) (2018-committee: 10.7% vs 2015-committee: 33.3%; p = 0.036). The average duration of the P&R procedure managed by the 2018-committee has increased by 45 days compared to the 2015-committee (287 days vs 242 days; p = 0.071) and this trend of delay is associated to the active scientific/economic assessment phase by CTS and CPR (particularly by the latter) and not to administrative phases (e.g. Official Journal publications). Conclusions. The observed differences between committees may be explained by the higher number of oncological and/or innovative drugs assessed by the 2018-committee (regarding the time delay, probably linked to greater difficulties in finding a win-win agreement able to satisfy both AIFA and Pharmaceutical Company). https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/view/2173AIFADrug accessPrice and ReimbursementTime-to-reimbursement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Paola Raimondo Giorgio Casilli Martina Isernia Dario Lidonnici Roberto Ravasio Virginia Ronco Elena Lanati |
spellingShingle |
Paola Raimondo Giorgio Casilli Martina Isernia Dario Lidonnici Roberto Ravasio Virginia Ronco Elena Lanati The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020 Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment AIFA Drug access Price and Reimbursement Time-to-reimbursement |
author_facet |
Paola Raimondo Giorgio Casilli Martina Isernia Dario Lidonnici Roberto Ravasio Virginia Ronco Elena Lanati |
author_sort |
Paola Raimondo |
title |
The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020 |
title_short |
The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020 |
title_full |
The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020 |
title_fullStr |
The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed |
The AIFA time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020 |
title_sort |
aifa time-to-reimbursement: a comparison between the last two committees from 2015 to 2020 |
publisher |
AboutScience Srl |
series |
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment |
issn |
2284-2403 2283-5733 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Objective. To compare the time-to-reimbursement of the last two committees of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), respectively appointed in 2015 and in 2018.
Methods. The analysis was run through a specific internal database created by MA-Provider. The database was populated with information regarding European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved new drugs, including each step of the Italian Price and Reimbursement (P&R) process reported in the monthly outcomes of Technical Scientific Committee (CTS) and Price and Reimbursement Committee (CPR) meetings from September 2015 to April 2020.
Results. The 2015 and the 2018 committees have reimbursed respectively 39 and 28 drugs by comparing their initial 19 months of activity. Significant differences have been observed in negotiated economic conditions, in particular an increase in the number of drugs with confidential discount (2018-committee: 96.4% vs 2015-committee: 64.1%; p = 0.003) and a reduction in the application of Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs) (2018-committee: 10.7% vs 2015-committee: 33.3%; p = 0.036). The average duration of the P&R procedure managed by the 2018-committee has increased by 45 days compared to the 2015-committee (287 days vs 242 days; p = 0.071) and this trend of delay is associated to the active scientific/economic assessment phase by CTS and CPR (particularly by the latter) and not to administrative phases (e.g. Official Journal publications).
Conclusions. The observed differences between committees may be explained by the higher number of oncological and/or innovative drugs assessed by the 2018-committee (regarding the time delay, probably linked to greater difficulties in finding a win-win agreement able to satisfy both AIFA and Pharmaceutical Company).
|
topic |
AIFA Drug access Price and Reimbursement Time-to-reimbursement |
url |
https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/view/2173 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paolaraimondo theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT giorgiocasilli theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT martinaisernia theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT dariolidonnici theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT robertoravasio theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT virginiaronco theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT elenalanati theaifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT paolaraimondo aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT giorgiocasilli aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT martinaisernia aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT dariolidonnici aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT robertoravasio aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT virginiaronco aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 AT elenalanati aifatimetoreimbursementacomparisonbetweenthelasttwocommitteesfrom2015to2020 |
_version_ |
1724288118515826688 |